Can’t I Love You Into Being Happy?

Last updated on: February 26, 2015 at 4:56 pm by Leah Libresco

Can’t I Love You Into Being Happy? 2015-02-26T16:56:37-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When Ellery Weil guest posted yesterday on The Last 5 Years and the demanding kind of support that Jamie offers Cathy, I realized that Jaime could have benefited from internalizing a meme I’ve seen floating around on tumblr.

Golbats for Equality spun up a quote from Nidoqueen into this image:

Image source: Golbats for Equality

In the musical, Jaime doesn’t know how to coexist with Cathy’s misery and exhaustion. He does try to help, in good faith, but I think Ellery is right that Jaime needs to feel like his help is working, immediately, in order to be confident in himself and in Cathy. When he was writing his “Shmuel” parable, and imagining how it would go, he imagined himself in the role of the magic clock — he would tell Cathy that she gets to be happy, and, after a little initial reluctance, she’d become so.

After reading Ellery’s comments, Jamie reminds me a little of the husband in Next to Normal. In that show, the character’s partner is facing a much more debilitating problem (bipolar disorder), but her partner is similarly stymied by his inability to help. I like “I’ve Been” enormously, in which he is exhausted but still committed, but the closest parallel to Jamie’s strained helpfulness is probably “It’s Gonna Be Good”

So what would it look like to do better than the lovers in The Last 5 Years and Next to Normal? I think there are some good ideas in a recent post by Eve Tushnet, when she talks about ways to address suffering that can’t be solved on your schedule. I’m excerpting it below, but the whole post (“Marriage as Work vs Marriage as the Cross”) is well worth reading (and it has the caveats you’re looking for, about when to give up on a relationship):

Losing this vocabulary of patience and taking up one’s cross has a few negative effects on us. First, if the only response to difficulties in marriage is “work harder,” we judge ourselves and others when our/their hard work doesn’t pay off. We expect payment for work done, and when our spouse doesn’t change, it’s natural to feel resentment. In the metaphor of “marriage as work” there’s no place for that resentment to go, no way to dissolve it: When will you pay me, say the bells of Old Bailey? The metaphor focuses our attention on the work we’re doing and what we’re owed for it.

Or, if other people’s marriages manifestly aren’t improving, we judge them (or give them the kind of advice which feels like judgment, it’s not like I’m innocent here) and tell them to work harder or work smarter.

We keep pretending that we live in these meritocratic systems: the financial meritocracy, of course, but also the meritocracy of mental health; and the meritocracy of marriage. But not everything can be earned or fixed. It’s “Earth has no sorrow that Heaven can’t heal,” not “Earth has no sorrow that sincere effort and good advice can’t heal.”

Read more at Eve’s blog…

Eve talks about how to seek sublimity in sorrow, so that someone like Jamie could acknowledge his own powerlessness to make Cathy happy or confident without feeling like that meant he had failed as a husband or that he couldn’t support or be supported by Cathy, as long as this pain persisted. In Eve’s understanding, sometimes the patience engendered by this approach allows problems (including one partner’s fear of the other one’s problems) to solve themselves or give both people space to later notice a different, better way to help. In some cases, though no resolution is forthcoming, and then the sublimation that Eve discusses isn’t a means to an end, but an end in itself, where partners learn to coexist with the trouble in a way where small choices and sacrifices are acts of love, if not as Hallmark-looking as dramatic boombox lofting.

I think people are better at adopting the framework Eve discusses for troubles we categorize as entirely outside of our locus of control, things like terminal or chronic diseases–It would be bizarre for Jamie to see the failure of his story to cure a hypothetical tumor as a failure of his love, but there’s still a lot of “put the work in to beat disease” rhetoric around.

The secularized version of Eve’s advice might be reminding partners that they have the option of providing palliative care. In Jamie’s case, that might mean realizing that he has ways to be kind to Cathy that aren’t directed at any long-term change in her mindset or their relationship.

Here, he might be happy to tell her that he’s ok with her skipping one of his book talks, because it gives him the opportunity to improve tonight for her, even if it has no bearing on tomorrow.

Don’t forget, The Last 5 Years is available to rent or stream, so you, too, can enjoy it and then send me a guest post. My previous posts on the movie are “No Villains, Just Inept Lovers in The Last 5 Years“ and “Asking a Lover for Too Limited Support” And Ellery Weil contributed “The Story of Shmuel and Tailoring Support.”

Marriage

Previous Post

February 25, 2015

The Story of Shmuel and Tailoring Support [Guest Post]

Next Post

February 27, 2015 7QT: Stoicism Man, Semi-Imaginary Money, and Second Moons

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the head of the Vatican City and the Roman Catholic Church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Archbishop Cardinal Patriarch Pope