Using Abortion Debates to Explain Bayesian Statistics

Last updated on: January 19, 2015 at 12:15 pm by Leah Libresco

Using Abortion Debates to Explain Bayesian Statistics 2015-01-19T12:15:07-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(cc from Wikipedia)

I’m never one to pass up a chance to leverage people’s interest in a hot-button social issue to talk about probability theory. I’m over at Ethika Politika today, talking about how base-rate neglect can skew people’s understanding of the significance of screening test (specifically, those for fetal abnormalities)

A New Danger to Expecting Mothers: Statistical Illiteracy

Abortion, the talking point goes, is a private matter between a woman and her doctor. But, after a series of missteps by companies offering early genetic screening, pro-choicers might want to append “… and a mathematician” to that phrase.

[…]

Usually, when advertisers tout a statistic of 99 percent accuracy, they’re talking about a true positive rate. That is: If you do have a genetic abnormality, the test will say that you do 99 percent of the time.

The trouble is, although a high true positive rate is nice, it’s not sufficient to make a test useful. At the extremes, I could run a very shady fetal screening company that had a 100 percent true positive (“accuracy”) rate, if I wasn’t above a bit of flim-flam.

All I’d have to do is take a blood sample from each woman who came to my clinic, wait a few days after her appointment, and then gravely call her to say that the results had come back positive—without ever having screened her blood at all! I’d be guaranteed to have a 100 percent true positive rate, because I would just tell every woman that her fetus was abnormal, meaning that I’d end up telling the truth to every woman whose pregnancy was actually unusual.

That would be cold comfort to all the women with run-of-the-mill pregnancies whom I’d misled.

Read more at Ethika Politika…

And, if you’re looking for MLK-blogging, today, check out my radio show this week, which is focused on Martin Luther King Jr’s martyrion (witness) and the Christological significance of the way he made the invisible violence of his communities visible, by offering his own body as place it would be recorded.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 18, 2015

I'm coming to the Bay Area and the Bayou, invite me to speak!

Next Post

January 20, 2015 Holy Fools Against the Mini-Maxers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jubilee" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Offering Restoration Ram's horn Blessed year