Friendzones and Fairness

Last updated on: September 6, 2014 at 3:32 pm by Leah Libresco

Friendzones and Fairness 2014-09-06T15:32:14-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When people talk about Nice Guy problems and friendzone problems (both on the internet and in my immediate environment), the conversations sometimes sound really similar to the kinds of things I would have heard on College Confidential or in a set of job interviewing tips.

People are talking in terms of tricks they’ve learned from others, discussing what actually goes on inside the decision-making black box, and laying out a sequence of moves that are likely to succeed. The unspoken assumption is that there must be some kind of secret, sneaky algorithm for getting someone to go out with you, getting into college, or acing your interview. Keeping that kind of thing secret is, indeed, frustrating-verging-on-unfair.

I can think of a couple of things that might contribute to this way of thinking (particularly in my social circles). For one thing most things I’ve done have functioned in this way, so, if dating didn’t, it would be an exception from everyday experience. Lots of processes I interact with are structured as ace-able applications, and when there’s a choice between something more freeform and something more structured, a lot of people I know have tended to pick the predictable, applying for consulting, banking, and Teach for America jobs, because those offered a standardized process, handbooks of tips, and winning strategies to implement.

It’s possible that dating/marriage used to look more like this, with a set of pretty-much known benchmarks to clear. After all, romantic love/attraction is a relatively new prerequisite to marriage, and it hasn’t been adopted everywhere. If you were just trying to demonstrate that you were a good provider/healthy enough to bear children/patient enough to work with someone else, that’s a lot easier to plan for than generating a frisson.

That’s why I find the “unfair” rhetoric around Nice Guy problems kind of off-putting. I don’t mind “hard,” “sad,” or “frustrating.” Those seem like pretty reasonable responses to striking out (and, as someone without any gentleman callers on the horizon, they’re certainly feelings I’ve had). But “unfair” suggests a rigged game where people aren’t giving you the information you need to be in the running.

It reminds me of a bit a drama (that for the purposes of anonymity, I may have witnessed or may have heard about thirdhand) between Alice, Bob, and Eve. Both of the girls were interested in Bob, and he was interested in both, but seemed to be trending Alice-wards. Eve was frustrated, and said that Bob was being unfair, since he hadn’t given her a straight answer to why he was preferring Eve or told her what she could do to come “first” and trump Alice in his affections.

I had the same feeling about that question as I do about guys who have asked me, “Well, what’s the way to ask a girl out so that she will say yes?” Bob isn’t obliged to have a “fair” race between Alice and Eve, and girls, generally, aren’t required to have some kind of transparent application process that people can study. I don’t just mean that they’re not required to disclose their “cheat codes” but that they just aren’t known in the first place.

If you build the ideals of relationships primarily around passion and chemistry, rather than shared circumstances, compatible dispositions, and shared goals, then you might be able to boost your chances generally (personal grooming, bringing up your interesting interests, etc) but there isn’t a reliable way to generate ineffable sparks.

We’re not stuck in the world of randomly assigned soulmates (that xkcd illustrated), but the more that successful romances are judged to be driven by intangibles, the harder it is to pursue or search strategically. And the more frustrating it feels to have people misunderstand you as concealing the rulebook.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 5, 2014

7QT: Reasonable Answers to Patently Crazy Questions

Next Post

September 7, 2014 Going Beyond Commandments of No to Vocations of Yes

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Rebekah's father?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Terah Bethuel Laban Abraham