What’s the Difference between Forgiveness and Self-Deception?

Last updated on: August 7, 2014 at 1:55 pm by Leah Libresco

What’s the Difference between Forgiveness and Self-Deception? 2014-08-07T13:55:51-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

An atheist friend of mine recently posted the following question to Facebook (and gave me permission to reprint it here):

I don’t think I grok forgiveness in the absence of Catholicism.

I keep trying to imagine what I might mean if I asked someone to forgive me. I certainly wouldn’t ask anybody that they purposefully have poorly calibrated beliefs about me, or that they have emotions poorly calibrated to their beliefs.

The best I’ve got at the moment is “please keep in mind that decision theory suggests that societies operating on a modified tit-for-tat model where there is a probability of cooperation following an opponent’s defection are better off than pure tit-for-tat societies”. But that still doesn’t seem quite right.

Ok, never mind, I wrote two more sentences and then realized they were false. That might well be a perfectly good description of “forgiveness”. …Maybe?

Edit: I was insufficiently clear. What I’m really trying to ask is “is there a thing it makes sense to call ‘forgiveness’ that we ‘ought’ to do”.

…I want people to be mad at me precisely in proportion to the thing I did and the updates they reasonably make from it, else they’ll be blindsided when I behave in the future as they ought to have predicted from the available evidence. The part of me that seeks forgiveness, I think, *does* want them to have poorly calibrated emotions in the near future, and doesn’t properly believe that distant future consequences are real. It seems bad to let that part of me get the upper hand. Forgiveness therefore seems to me, at the moment, like a vice.

I’m going to paraphrase my friend’s question, since it’s pretty precisely stated in terms of game/decision theory. She’s asking whether forgiveness is anything more than the deliberate adoption of false beliefs or deluded emotions about the trustworthiness of others.

If someone betrays you, and you “forgive” them, are you just resolutely refusing to improve your model of the world and your friend’s honesty? Are you changing your expectations of what will happen in the future to be more accurate, but refusing to allow yourself to feel the emotions that come naturally.

My friend’s best guess was that “forgiveness” is a way of reminding ourselves socially that, in game theoretic terms, average outcomes are better when defection/betrayal isn’t always followed by further defection/betrayal/shunning (though it should happen often enough to discourage free riders).

I’d like to see what commenters make of her question, particularly the atheist readers, or Christian readers willing to couch their arguments in entirely secular terms. (Though, if you think forgiveness makes no sense outside of Christianity or religion generally, by all means, chime in and say why).

I took a crack at her question, and, first of all, I realized I had a much better idea of what it means to have accurate beliefs about someone’s future behavior than “well/poorly calibrated emotions.” If my beliefs about actions are accurate, I can make decent predictions of what will happen in the future. If my emotions linked to beliefs are accurate, I… still not sure. I can think of failure modes (spirals into panic attacks, depression, etc) but to pick out the best of the stable scenarios, I think you need to appeal to a normative theory of ethics.

But, back to the main thrust of the question — I’d make my secular pitch for forgiveness by arguing that people are in a different category than other things I try to have accurate expectations about. It wouldn’t make much sense to “forgive” the uneven patch of sidewalk that keeps tripping me or the traffic jam that keeps annoying me. They’ll keep repeating themselves independent of my feelings of “forgiveness” so I really am putting myself in danger of having inaccurate beliefs (and scraped knees, and late arrivals).

But people are different. My expectations of them is one of the factors that influence their actions. When we’re willing to forgive other people, it’s a bit like adopting growth mindset for other people. Growth mindset (cf Carol Dweck) is the opposite of fixed mindset. It’s the difference between talking about your flaws as set in stone–part of what makes you you, or treating them as mutable.

My parents did a pretty good job teaching me to think this way (“I’m just not athletic!” “You mean you’re not athletic right now, or that you haven’t been athletic up til this point“). Growth mindset makes it easier to make positive change, and to avoid internalizing poisonous Homeric epithets.

Forgiving others means offering growth mindset to them, too, reassuring you both that, in the words of mutual funds disclaimers, past performance is not indicative of future results. The past is probably a little more likely to be correlated with the future when it comes to ethics, instead of stock picking, but that is a general trend, rather than destiny for this particular relationship.

Forgiveness is incompatible with indifference (which is often where my emotions end up by default). When I update my beliefs about other people’s competence/caring/etc without incorporating forgiveness, I tend to treat people as static inconveniences to be routed around, no different than a physical obstacle.

But I don’t like what happens (to me or to them) when I think of people instrumentally. Forgiving others, speaking in terms of growth mindset means treating them as growing, living things that can improve themselves, whose wholeness you wish for, both because it is helpful and because it is beautiful.

Atheism

Morality in Practice

radical forgiveness

Previous Post

August 6, 2014

Need Draws Out Grace

Next Post

August 8, 2014 7QT: Flipped Journals, Fake Football, and Finite Tragedy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

The Old Testament prophet Joel spoke of "wonders in the heavens and the earth, blood, fire, and pillars of smoke before the great and terrible day of the Lord." (Joel 2:30) Which one of the disciples quoted him in the book of Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John James Peter Andrew