Charity for Society’s Canaries

Last updated on: August 27, 2014 at 11:47 am by Leah Libresco

Charity for Society’s Canaries 2014-08-27T11:47:02-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

After Robin Williams’s suicide, SlateStarCodex wrote a thoughtful meditation, and I’d like to highlight one of the points he wound up making. Scott works in mental health, and he wound up discussing the idea of “being a burden” and pointing out that this isn’t an intrinsic fact about a person, but the result of who they are and how their society relates to them.

Society got where it is by systematically destroying everything that could have supported him [a patient] and replacing it with things that required skills he didn’t have. Of course it owes him when he suddenly can’t support himself. Think of it as the ultimate use of eminent domain; a power beyond your control has seized everything in the world, it had some good economic reasons for doing so, but it at least owes you compensation!

This is also the basis of my support for a basic income guarantee. Imagine an employment waterline, gradually rising through higher and higher levels of competence. In the distant past, maybe you could be pretty dumb, have no emotional continence at all, and still live a pretty happy life. As the waterline rises, the skills necessary to support yourself comfortably become higher and higher. Right now most people in the US who can’t get college degrees – which are really hard to get! – are just barely hanging on, and that is absolutely a new development. Soon enough even some of the college-educated won’t be very useful to the system. And so on, until everyone is a burden. …

By the time I am a burden – it’s possible that I am already, just because I can convince the system to give me money doesn’t mean the system is right to do so, but I expect I certainly will be one before I die – I would like there to be in place a crystal-clear understanding that we were here first and society doesn’t get to make us obsolete without owing us something in return.

After that, we will have to predicate our self-worth on something other than being able to “contribute” in the classical sense of the term. Don’t get me wrong, I think contributing something is a valuable goal, and one it’s important to enforce to prevent free-loaders. But it’s a valuable goal at the margins, some people are already heading for the tails, and pretty soon we’ll all be stuck there.

It’s easy to assume, when you don’t fit nicely or happily into society that it means that there’s something wrong with you, but civil society, and the economy, and all the other structures of human relations exist to serve human flourishing — we don’t exist to simply keep the suprastructures running smoothly.

Looking at the people treated as ‘burdens’ and asking what we could do differently for them is good for the individual people currently left out, but I expect it’s also good for the rest of us. Think of them as canaries in the coal mine — showing us what our society currently doesn’t emphasize/value/offer by default. If for people in crisis, these needed goods are absent, are you sure they’re not attenuated in your own life?

Sometimes, the changes needed to allow people to join the “ordinary” world are small (more flexibility in work structure, more patience on the part of coworkers for non-neurotypical reactions to touch or interruptions). But there’s almost an anti-curbcutting attitude that is suspicious of these accomodations — if we allow them for some people, what if more people try to use them? Well, possibly it suggests the accomodations are just plain useful. (cf the way the environmental and emotional prerequisites for successful unschooling are good for adults as well as kids).

It may be logistically difficult to make everyone’s life more stable/pleasant/engaging in the way that “burdensome” people require to keep their heads above water, but that represents an imperfection of our society, not an imperfection of people for longing for leisure/patience/charity/etc.

P.S. For a very concrete example of a feature of society that made it harder to be a non-burden, see Elizabeth Warren’s The Two Income Trap (which Scott has also reviewed thoughtfully).

Morality in Practice

offering weakness

Previous Post

August 26, 2014

On Writing (and thus on Wizardry)

Next Post

August 28, 2014 God's Call to Restore Our Common Sense

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do just before raising Lazarus from the dead?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He wept He prayed He preached He climbed a hill