Bracing for an Intelligence Explosion [Guest Post]

Last updated on: July 3, 2014 at 4:18 am by Leah Libresco

Bracing for an Intelligence Explosion [Guest Post] 2014-07-03T04:18:57-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While I’m on vacation in Ireland, I’ve invited Unequally Yoked readers to assemble a wunderkammer of guest posts on books, practices, ideas, etc that particularly delight them. Claire began this series with her post on prayers following communion, K.Chen followed on the virtues of YouTube covers, Ben Conroy talked about how stories enchant us, and today’s post is from James D. Miller, an associate professor of economics at Smith College and the author of Singularity Rising.

Mankind is going to become a lot smarter through creating brilliant machines and by augmenting our own intelligence. In my book Singularity Rising I define a singularity as a threshold of time at which enhanced intelligence radically remakes human civilization. Our primary moral goal should be to achieve a good singularity.

The many independent paths to intelligence enhancement combined with the massive economic and military incentives to boost human and machine intelligences make me confident that we will reach singularity, even if it’s a destination we should want to avoid. I don’t have the space here to adequately explain the numerous ways we might increase intelligence, but the two main paths are through the exponentially growing power of Moore’s law which causes the speed of computer chips to regularly double and the rapidly falling price of gene sequencing.

Computers are doing more and more tasks, and once they master computer design and programming they will likely explode in intelligence as Moore’s law will supercharge the growth in computer capacity. And since intelligence is a reflective super power, able to turn in on itself to discover its own workings, as computers get smarter, they will figure out better ways of making themselves even smarter.

After we learn the genetic basis of intelligence we will likely be able to birth brilliant children, possibly by (as I wrote about here) eliminating mutational load. Every human has lots of bad mutations, many undoubtedly damaging cognition. Harmful mutations tend to be rare because evolution works against their spread, so if you have a gene variant that almost no one else has, the odds of the gene being harmful are much greater than it being beneficial. Once we learn to edit an embryo’s genome we will have the capacity to create children much smarter than have ever existed by banishing mutational load. When you combine eugenics with likely advances in smart drugs, brain training, brain implants, and neurofeedback the future will give us the capacity to reliably produce hyper-geniuses as above Einstein in mathematical ability as he was from me.

Even if the United States rejects eugenics for moral reasons, not all other countries will. There doesn’t exist a world body strong enough to stop eugenics. And a world in which Chinese, but only Chinese, eight-year-olds are regularly mastering calculus is one in which the United States will almost certainly embark on an anything goes effort to increase the IQ of its next generation.

The post-singularity future will belong to the most intelligent, and they will likely soon acquire the means of colonizing the universe. For every person alive today, a trillion more might yet live meaningful lives if the singularity goes well. But a bad singularity could result in mankind’s extinction or in the resources of the universe being used for some pointless (to us) purpose of the ruling powers.

Three tech titans: Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Larry Page have by their words, deeds, and donations shown that they believe in the plausibility of a singularity. Given these men’s skill at predicting and shaping technological trends, their authority makes a powerful argument for the likelihood of the singularity. Even if you assign only a ten percent chance of the singularity occurring, because of the massive stakes involved analogous logic to Pascal’s wager imposes a moral duty on us, perhaps greater than any other secular one, to work towards a utopian singularity.

Leah again: There’s plenty to debate in James’s pitch, and I hope he’ll stick around in comments, but, personally, I’m most curious about the assumption that (leaving ethics and feasibility entirely aside) eugenic-assisted children would necessarily become dominant in a dangerous way over everyone else. Smart can certainly smooth your way in the world, in the same way that whiteness or maleness or attractiveness or good family connections can, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that people will want their way smoothed toward power*.*

Plenty of Ivy League grads are quite happy to take their smarts and advantages to Wall Street and investment banking, picking money and (eventual) leisure over anything more disruptive or exciting. Many mathematics wunderkinds are aiming for grad school and a life of research, for example, so a country shooting for 8-year olds enraptured with calculus might find they’d bred a class of Ferdinand the Bulls, enchanted by contemplation of the world and not that responsive to your desires.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 2, 2014

Interview with Atheist Ireland, Talk at The Irish Catholic tonight

Next Post

July 4, 2014 Dispatches from Irish Prisons, Pubs, etc

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built the temple in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abraham Moses David Solomon