Starving for Communal Spaces and Communion

Last updated on: January 30, 2014 at 11:49 am by Leah Libresco

Starving for Communal Spaces and Communion 2014-01-30T11:49:44-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Over at AmCon today, I’ve got a piece up “Starving for Communal Spaces” and here’s how it opens:

A man walks into a business establishment and pays a small sum of money for the use of their premises. He’s slightly furtive about it, and the proprietor would probably deny the nature of the service provided, but the gentleman is seeking companionship, and doesn’t have anywhere else to go.

I’m not describing the kind of tawdry hotel that rents its rooms by the hour, but a coffee shop or a fast food outlet. And the gentleman in question might be an elderly Korean man, one of the group that got ejected from a McDonald’s in New York City for repeatedly lingering too long over their coffees.

The retirees weren’t really there for the McCafé lattes, of course. I’ve pulled the same trick, scanning a Starbucks menu for the cheapest drink, picking out a chair, and pulling out a novel. The drink is really just a ticket, that, displayed properly, entitles the bearer to one seat and a bit of table space for up to two hours.

It’s quite reasonable that the baristas would rather sell me coffee, not lease me real estate. After all, if someone behaved this way in a restaurant, pulling out a laptop and settling in after their meal, they’d be behaving badly. But I’m not sure who we’re supposed to patronize for communal space instead.

Read the rest at AmCon…

The whole time I was working on this post, I kept thinking of an article from The Good Men project that I’d read a while before, “The Lack of Gentle Platonic Touch in Men’s Lives is a Killer.” The author talks about how there’s very little cultural space for casual person-to-person contact for men. Handholding, mussing someone’s hair, or just sharing a couch without an inch wide DMZ is perceived as sexual, whatever the gender of the person you’re touching.

As I read the piece, I certainly agreed it was a problem, but it hardly seemed exclusive to men. Now that I’m single again, the sign of peace at Daily Mass is usually the only time I touch another person. And, even then, everyone tends to space themselves out, one person every other pew, so we’re too far apart for anything but a quick wave and a mouthed “Peace.”

When I went on my exchange trip to China after high school, I remember being jealous when, during the briefing sessions, they warned us that in China, friends of any gender combination hold hands, and we shouldn’t assume our hosts were hitting on us if they reached out to us. I missed it when I returned stateside.

In college, there was a lot more platonic touch, which might be partly a knock-on effect of the casual social environment, but seems to also be driven by the availability of common spaces. When we were frequently in literal “common rooms” it was natural to all wind up draped over a couch or hitting each other affectionately. Now, as an adult, when I see more of my friends for coffee or at the theatre, our personal space feels more inviolate in these scheduled, structured times. When you don’t touch anyone for long periods of time (and, perhaps when you’re also a recovering gnostic) your body can feel a bit less real and a bit more tool-like, since it exists primarily to manipulate objects.

Morality in Practice

no war but culture war

Previous Post

January 29, 2014

Rolling Stone Misses the Source of Francis's Joy

Next Post

January 31, 2014 7 Quick Takes (1/31/14)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king's name appears as an author in Proverbs, apart from Solomon?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Saul David Hezekiah Lemuel