Hold Your Slippery Slope Toboggans!

Last updated on: December 14, 2013 at 4:40 pm by Leah Libresco

Hold Your Slippery Slope Toboggans! 2013-12-14T16:40:03-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last night, I kept seeing a news story pop up in my social media feeds: “Federal Court Strikes Down Criminalization of Polygamy In Utah.”

The family that brought the suit is the Brown family, of the reality tv show Sister Wives. Kody Brown, his four wives, and their seventeen children had moved away from Utah after they went public, to avoid prosecution. I assumed, naturally enough, that this might mean that plural marriage was now legal in Utah (or at least legal pending appeal). But the actual ruling is a little duller and picayune than that.

The Brown family was accused of bigamy, and it was part of Utah § 76-7-101, the relevant law, that was ruled unconstitutional. It defines bigamy as follows:

(1) A person is guilty of bigamy when, knowing he has a husband or wife or knowing the other person has a husband or wife, the person purports to marry another person or cohabits with another person.
(2) Bigamy is a felony of the third degree.
(3) It shall be a defense to bigamy that the accused reasonably believed he and the other person were legally eligible to remarry.

Judge Clark Wadooups struck the “or cohabits with another person” line as unconstitutional. So, the mere fact that Brown was living with sister wives was not sufficient to make him guilty of bigamy. And as for the “purports to marry” test, Wadooups quoted another ruling and concluded that the state only has an interest in regulating people who purport to be married by the State, not by a church.

This interest focuses on preventing the harm caused to the state, to society, and to defrauded individuals when someone purports to have entered the legal status of marriage, but in fact is not eligible to validly enter that status because of a prior legal union. This interest is simply not implicated here, where no claim to the legal status of marriage has been made.

So, Brown can purport to be married to as many people he likes on, say, Facebook, as long as he doesn’t imply he has more than one legally recognized marriage or try to claim benefits or tax breaks from one of his marriages in name only.

This seems like reasonable enough jurisprudence to me. Arguably (but not definitively) Lawrence v. Texas pretty much did for adultery laws, and the cohabitation prong of the bigamy law seems like it’s of that type. (Though, technically, it criminalized a housing arrangement instead of a sex act). But, at any rate, people have as much right to say they’re married to multiple people as to a bridge.

Different sects and religions can conduct marriages that are not legally recognized, and the question of whether they should is distinct from whether they’re criminal.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 13, 2013

7 Quick Takes (12/13/13)

Next Post

December 15, 2013 Christmas Poems for Gaudete Sunday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 2 Corinthians, Paul describes a man being caught up to the third heaven. How many years before writing did this happen?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ten years Seven years Twelve years Fourteen years