Knock Knock. Who’s There? A Wedding… I think

Last updated on: November 13, 2013 at 11:26 am by Leah Libresco

Knock Knock. Who’s There? A Wedding… I think 2013-11-13T11:26:31-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The NYT Weddings section recently reported on a new trend for marriage officiants: marketing themselves for their entertainment potential rather than any particular ministry. One popular officiant is the Kenny Kramer, who inspired the Seinfeld character of the same name.

The bride’s parents squirmed. Seconds later, Mr. Kramer, who prefers not to be called the Rev. Kramer but rather Irreverent Kramer, pronounced the smiling couple husband and wife, and after they kissed, he reminded them of his customized lifetime warranty: if they divorce, their next weddings are pro bono. Nervous laughter punctuated the room…

Mr. Cherlin [a sociologist] explained that more brides and grooms are financing their own weddings, a trend that removes parental influence over the ceremony, including its religiosity. “Having that ‘Seinfeld’-based Internet minister is more consistent with the idea that weddings should be a fun celebration,” he added. “It’s a new kind of wedding that’s more about the couple and less about the families.”

Dick Zigun, a playwright and Coney Island performer, is a Universal Life Church minister. He frequently marries couples while wearing a vintage bathing suit and a top hat. “If you want something colorful, loud and outrageous at the beach or freak-show style, I can do that,” he said. “But I am willing to do something neutral, proper and legit, too.”’

It’s interesting that the lack of responsibility to parents and other older keepers of tradition enables couples to make more diverse choices in their own ceremonies. I rolled my eyes at some points of this article, but not simply because the ceremonies were zany. The two burlesque performers in the article who were married at an arts center with zombie bridesmaids did seem to be trying to find a nuptial ceremony that authentically reflected their community.

But some of the couples in the article seem to be trying to just gussy up the ceremony, so they can make sure it can keep the attention of their guests, and maybe the couple themselves. It’s true that a legal wedding takes very little time, so couples may feel the need to pad out the ceremony, so it feels more worth the plane flights and hotel stays. But I find it odd that they’re filling time with acts and performances meant to undercut the solemnity of the occasion.

As usual, when reading NYT features on unusual weddings, I wish the reporter had asked more of the couples what kind of jump discontinuity (if any) they thought marriage represented in their relationship. As it is, I can’t tell if the comic elements are meant to ironize marriage as an institution or if they reflect something about each particular couple and community or if they’re the result of scrabbling around for new traditions once you’ve rejected the standard scripts.

I know the default is to blame contraception and cohabitation for muddling the waters around marriage, but there are still clear inflection points around exclusivity and irrevocability. Modern couples, secular or not, are saying a tremendous amount when they echo The Last 5 Years and say “This is the life I choose- / This is the thing I can’t bear to lose / Trip us or trap us, but we refuse to fall.” In a culture where relationships are, by default, sexually intimate without being permanent or serious, there’s plenty of room for weddings to mark a major turning point, without bringing any theology or tradition into it. But I can’t tell what phase changes, if any these couples mean to mark.

Going off book means you lose the lingua franca of what a wedding means, and your guests (and you!) may need to re-explain what is happening a little more emphatically than usual. I don’t object to people going outside tradition, if they feel abandoned or unserved by it, but I prefer people to make a clear choice for something, not just against the default. I can’t tell whether it’s the result of lax reporting or vague aesthetics, but I can’t tell what the couples in this article are promising each other and their communities besides a rollicking good time.

Marriage

Previous Post

November 12, 2013

Science Fiction is a Compliment

Next Post

November 14, 2013 All Parenthood in a Day

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is considered the ideal wife and mother in Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Proverbs 31 woman Mary Magdalene Martha Eve