Disenchanting the Villain

Last updated on: November 19, 2013 at 1:19 pm by Leah Libresco

Disenchanting the Villain 2013-11-19T13:19:41-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

First Things has a review up that I liked very much of a Macbeth that the reviewer did not like very much. Kate Havard watched a Macbeth that took all the tragedy out of the Scottish King, reducing the title character (played by Ethan Hawke) to a stumbling, unpleasant man. She writes:

Yet there’s something right about making the Scottish tyrant so vulgar and unromantic. It reminds us Macbeth is ultimately a butcher, not a hero. True, in a more nuanced Macbeth, we’d see him as both: a fallen hero. But this one-note performance does help us see more clearly the nature of evil. As Simone Weil says, “Imaginary evil is romantic and varied; real evil is gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring.” Hawke’s Macbeth touches on this truth: Evil isn’t noble looking. Evil is small and petty and ugly.

…Lady Macbeth, on the other hand, is surprised by and scared of her husband’s cruelty. How is this possible? After all, she’s the one that spurs him on at first. Shouldn’t she know that this is who she married, and that this is what she’s getting? Well, yes—and so she, too, shows us something about evil—that is, the follies of romanticizing evil, how seductive it can be.

This Lady Macbeth was in love with imaginary evil. She may have even fancied herself beyond good and evil, even though she has to invoke the devil to get things done. She mistakes bloodthirstiness and strength for greatness of soul by marrying a great warrior who she thinks will be a great king. She is willing to do whatever it takes to get him there. But once she relieves him from the bonds of morality, he becomes insatiable, a monster dangerous even to her.

Pop over and read the whole review. Havard does an excellent job arguing that this production doesn’t let the audience off the hook for wanting to root for Macbeth. In this case, because of hamhanded characterization, we suffer the way that Lady Macbeth suffers, unable to romanticize the man who is slaughtering others.

The review touched a nerve for me, since I have a dreadful tendency to root for the villains of movies, books, and plays. For one thing, they often seem to be the only person in the plot who has a plan, and my logistics-loving heart tends to prompt a desire to give the heroes a good shaking as they persist in their reactive state.

And there’s a mechanical beauty to manipulation. I could watch Act I, Scene ii of Richard III (the seduction of Anne) again and again, in the same way I reread technical manuals on lockpicking or watch embroidery tutorials on youtube. I like seeing how things work, and villains tend to lay the inner parts of the heroes bare, so I can observe all the interlocking mechanisms.

So I was really surprised to not enjoy the American reimagining of House of Cards. In the Netflix show, Kevin Spacey as Frank Underwood is an adept Congressman and fixer, who always has a plan and a trump card, whose ploys are sometimes so subtle that he has to turn to the audience for a soliloquy to let us in on the joint, since his target is so enmeshed in his deception that he or she might thank Underwood’s character for setting their destruction in motion. Tailor-made for wonkish me.

But as I watched the series, the character and the show grated. I couldn’t figure out what Underwood wanted. I mean, power, obviously, but I couldn’t guess to what end. I never saw him work on legislation except instrumentally. What was the point of amassing favors and elevating himself unless at some point he planned to spend his political capital?

Underwood is skilled at manipulation because he can stack feints and betrayals; he is always capable of discarding a former asset when it would be to his advantage to do so. But the price of being able to look at anyone and anything and see a map of leverage points seems to be that he has lost the ability to see anything non-instrumentally. I found myself wanting to hiss Amy’s plea to Bobby from the end of Company at the television: “Want something! Want something!”

After the music swells, and the plan comes to fruition, and the villain stands above the crown of defeated heroes and civilians, there’s a pause where we wait to know what the character will do, now that s/he is free of constraint. And, when I try to run the tape forward for most villains, there’s just an awkward pause, similar to the one at the end of The Graduate, as the protagonist doesn’t quite know what to do with himself. Normally, the heroes keep us from ever getting to this moment of uncertainty, as they rush in with their own music to put paid to the villain, but I appreciate being forced to wait, every now and then, with a successful villain, as I watch them wait for something to want for its own sake.

Reviews/Recommendations

Previous Post

November 18, 2013

Philosophy Class Should Be Perilous

Next Post

November 20, 2013 Peeta Already Kicks Ass, No Blood Needed

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for using incense during worship?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Pentecostals Orthodox Christians Jehovah’s Witnesses