Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unequally Yoked

Strange Idols and Strange Identities

Last updated on: June 2, 2013 at 9:57 pm   by Leah Libresco

Strange Idols and Strange Identities 2013-06-02T21:57:54-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In Strange Gods: Unmasking the Idols in Everyday Life, Elizabeth Scalia has a simple definition of an idol. In the decalogue, we are warned by God to have no other/foreign/strange gods before Him.  So, in our modern age, Scalia points out, our idols are less likely to be something like, say a giant golden calf that give burt offerings, and more likely to be letting Reddit usurp our prayer time.  An idol doesn’t have to be worshiped to impose itself between us and God.

But what would it be like to face God, with nothing between us and Him?  It’s sounds terrifying, akin to the staring at the sun sect that appears in “The Eye of Apollo” from Chesterton’s The Innocence of Father Brown.  Or maybe it’s like the experience of  Frodo, when he cried out to Sam, “I am naked in the dark, Sam, there is no veil between me and the wheel of fire!  I begin to see it even with my waking eyes.”

The technically-good horror of facing God directly is why I’ve always liked this quotation from Diane Duane’s A Wizard Alone:

“Virtue,” he said. “The real thing. It’s not some kind of cuddly teddy bear you can keep on the shelf until you need a hug. It’s dangerous, which is why it makes people so nervous. Virtue has its own agenda, and believe me, it’s not always yours. The word itself means strength, power. And when it gets loose, you’d better watch out.”

“Something bad might happen…”

“Impossible. But possibly something painful”

I’m someone who tends to take about fifteen to twenty minutes to get into a swimming pool — wading in inch by inch, with copious wincing.  When I was in kindergarten, and got to play on the monkey bars for the first time, I hung from just the first rung and practiced   dangling and swinging back to the platform and getting off.  Once I could do that calmly, I dropped from the first bar about a dozen times until I was sure I falling wasn’t too bad.  My sense of safety depended on my sense of control.  That’s not an option in Catholicism.

I have a wunderkammer of idols, but I notice that a fair amount are an attempt to draw some kind of screen between myself and God or other people (same difference, after all “to love another person is to see the face of God“).  It’s easy to interact as a persona, rather than a person.  Stephen Colbert-in-character is an extreme example, but it’s always tempting to exaggerate flaws and foibles to the point where they’re comical instead of vulnerabilities.

I’ve been trying to be more careful about running jokes and Homeric epithets since I caught myself using one as a crutch.  After seeing The Mikado, I stole one of the phrases (“in my artless Japanese way”) to use as an excuse when I was socially maladroit.  Instead of being callous or careless, I was being amusingly strange.  But it would be better to be sincere, regretful, and have the ability to grow — to not treat that weakness as an essential distinguishing trait.

In the secular world, you see this point made by many disability activists (a person without the use of her legs, not a paraplegic).  In the autistic and Deaf communities, this kind of language becomes controversial precisely because there’s a disagreement about whether their differences are incidental or essential to identity.  We can all stand to be a little more thoughtful about the names and identities we hold on to.  Paul Graham counsels people to “Keep your identity small” and view as few things as possible as inviolate.

The trouble is, the part I should hold on to “adopted daughter of God” is so much vaguer than the identities I’d like to hand on to: New Yorker (with attendant walking and speaking speed), Sondheim nerd, brusque/efficient, bad at small talk, uninterested in physical activities, kludger/engineer, etc.

But if I only hold on to what I can grasp, I’m choosing to remain small and isolated.  To submit to God, I have to be ok with not having mastery.

Reviews/Recommendations

Previous Post



May 31, 2013

7 Quick Takes (5/31/13)

Next Post



June 4, 2013 Modern Stoicism - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted Nebuchadnezzar's dream of a statue of gold, silver, bronze, iron, and clay?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Ezekiel Obadiah Hosea

Related posts from Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Books on deck for me for 2017

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

My Favorite Books of 2016

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

The Boring, Quiet Rituals That Sustain Us Spiritually

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Starving Laypeople of Devotion in Church

Unequally Yoked

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube