Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Unequally Yoked

Home
Catholic
“Give Us More To See”

“Give Us More To See”

Last updated on: December 11, 2012 at 6:18 pm by Leah Libresco

“Give Us More To See” 2012-12-11T18:18:22-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“But how George looks. He could look forever
As if he sees you and he doesn’t all at once.”

Yesterday, I used Georges Seurat (as imagined by Stephen Sondheim in Sunday in the Park with George) to open up a discussion about the difficulty of pursuing intimacy with God (or, often, other people). Play!George might approve of my framing a discussion of truth through artifice, since that’s exactly how he manages to see and comprehend others in the show. In “Finishing the Hat” (below), George explains that he can only understand or interact with people from a distance.

Entering the world of the hat.
Reaching through the world of the hat like a window
Back to this one from that.

Studying a face.
Stepping back to look at a face,
leaves a little space in the way like a window.
But to see–
It’s the only way to see.

People are just too much. When he is completely open and present to them, George can’t make any sense out of them. It’s all as much “Chaos” and is as senseless as scanning George’s pointillist painting dot by dot and trying to understand the whole image. But Dot, his lover, either doesn’t realize that this is what intimacy looks like for George, or she doesn’t trust him that his distance allows him perspective, instead of an excuse to blur out what doesn’t appeal. How can she tell?

Maybe George isn’t even engaged enough to merit the accusation that Roger levels at filmmaker Mark in another musical (“You’re always preaching not to be numb, but that’s how you thrive. You pretend to create and observe when you really detach from being alive”). Mark sees the real world, but holds himself back from participation, but Dot justifiably fears that George might not even be withdrawing from her, just his image of her. But I think there’s a hint to the accuracy of George’s vision in the opening of “The Day Off.” George sketches a dog and sings:

If the head was smaller…
If the tail were longer…
If he faced the water…
If the paws were hidden…
If the neck was darker…
If the back was curved…
More like the parasol…

George doesn’t just see, he alters. While I was watching the show, I wasn’t sure if this was a positive sign. If George is just using his art to assert mastery over the world around him as he “brings order to the whole” it looks like a point in favor of Dot’s theory that he doesn’t really know her. But, in order to alter Dot, or the dog, he must be able to see them accurately. Working to bring the elements of his painting into harmony means that George must be intensely aware of every way they jangle against his imagined ideal.

Call it the via negativa, the grotesque, or the virtue of an almost-right solution, but this seems to be exactly what Lewis called for in the Screwtape Letters; an awareness of the inadequacy of the constructed image. By noticing where the representation fails, you gain a better understanding of the thing you still may not be able to picture. Almost-convincing androids show us what we recognize as human; nearly-plausible chatbots teach us what we value most about conversation.

Here’s a practical example. Most days, I pray Morning and Night Office from the Liturgy of the Hours. When I’ve got a bit of extra time, I try to translate the psalms into ASL as I go. I’m pretty terrible at this, since my vocabulary and syntax are patchy, and that ends up being pretty helpful. I might read something like:

My dwelling, like a shepherd’s tent,
is struck down and borne away from me

And see how close I can get with

MY HOME BROKEN, LEAVE-ME ALONE

An actual translator could pull something similarly poetic, but I’m like a Deaf toddler. The inadequacy of my vocabulary is frustrating, and it draws my attention back to the nuances of the prayer I’m making. “Leave” isn’t really like “borne away.” Someone could leave on their own, but if my home is being borne away, I might reasonably wonder who’s doing the bearing and what use they plan to make of it.

Or sometimes, I’ll be surprised by the appropriateness of the sign that reveals something visceral I was missing in the English. I can’t find a decent ASL video of the Agnus Dei, but it’s a lot harder to gloss over the magnitude of “Have mercy on us” when you actually have to inflect the mercy sign as directed to you from God.

We may long for the beatific vision, but we can’t achieve it on our own efforts. The best I can do is to be present enough to be discombobulated by the lacunae in my model. Because if I have a hole, I must have a kind of sense of what it fits (or, at least, what it doesn’t).

Epistemology/Philosophy

Previous Post

December 10, 2012

Finishing the Imago Dei

Next Post

December 12, 2012 Superpowered Feminism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Moses do after breaking the tablets?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fasted for 30 days Returned to Sinai for new tablets Left the camp Destroyed the calf