Fixing my Fights

Last updated on: December 30, 2012 at 1:04 am by Leah Libresco

Fixing my Fights 2012-12-30T01:04:34-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The most surreal part of attending the Reason Rally and the American Atheists conference happened during a conversation with a fellow attendee when he told me I might know him better by his pseudonym. It turned out that he was a commenter who had gone after me pretty aggressively as an accommodationist during my stint guestblogging at Daylight Atheism.

It’s hard, when interacting online, to imagine your interlocutors as real people (and in this case, even the efforts I had made were misguided — for some reason I had always pictured this commenter as a woman, so I was almost as startled by his gender as I was by meeting him in the flesh). Once the initial awkwardness was out of the way, we ended up hanging out and having a nice afternoon.

I had another incident or two of this type at the American Atheists Conference (in one case, a blogger grabbed me again after we met and said he’d looked back at our past exchange online and regretted the way it had spiraled out of control). Every time I met someone I had fought with online, we ended up having a good conversation and getting along. (Though I should caveat that by saying I met PZ Myers only in passing and didn’t get to discuss my critique of his desecration stunt).

The weekend was a reminder that I’m bad at gauging people’s sentiment online. Because my judgement is unreliable, I have to actively override my intuitions. Here’s the error check that works best for me (when I remember to apply it):

No matter how sure I feel that the other person is engaging in bad faith, or is unreachable, or is just plain mean, I have to respond as though they responded politely and cheerfully.

I can’t find the citation right now(Vlad found the citation), but I remember there’s a cogsci paper I read in college where two study participants were told to use a finger to press the other persons hand. They took turns, and both were supposed to match the amount of pressure that the other person had just used on them. The scientists had them hooked to a pressure sensor, so they could see exactly how much force was being used, but the subjects were working from feel.

In almost every iteration, the subjects ended up in a vicious cycle, where both participants kept pressing harder and harder. What the other person does to us feels a lot nastier than what we do to them. I need to work on remembering that my perceptions on this kind of thing are really badly calibrated. So not only do I need to compensate for my own biased reaction, but I need to further undershoot so I don’t trigger my interlocutor’s skewed perception.

When I blog about plays featuring famous thinkers, I’m careful to caveat that I’m responding to play!Lewis or play!Spinoza, so that I’m not misrepresenting the actual thinker. I tend to riff on posts that come up in my RSS feed or comments on this blog and use them as a way to introduce some problem I’ve been thinking about offline, and I’ll try to make more of an effort to distinguish between what the person I’m quoting is arguing, and the way I’m using that quote to explore a different issue.

The other thing I noticed, on reflection, is that I only tend to quote other bloggers and writers when I disagree with them. In my mind, it’s not very interested to blockquote and then write “Ditto,” so I only single out the people I can pick a fight with. Would you all be interested in me highlighting posts or quotes that I won’t have much commentary on? Any other suggestions for this general problem?

Previous Post

April 6, 2012

Reason Rally Wrap-Up

Next Post

April 8, 2012 Which doctrines must a Catholic assent to?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Nebuchadnezzar" mean in Akkadian?

Select your answer to see how you score.

O Nabu, protect my heir The Lord reigns Chosen by the gods King of Babylon