Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Unequally Yoked

Home
Catholic
7 Quick Takes (3/16/12)

7 Quick Takes (3/16/12)

Last updated on: December 10, 2012 at 1:32 pm by Leah Libresco

7 Quick Takes (3/16/12) 2012-12-10T13:32:55-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

— 1 —

This weekend, I’m going up to NYC to see my family, and we’re all seeing the B’way production of Newsies!

I certainly hope you’re all familiar with the best Disney musical, which is based on the Newsboys Strike of 1899, so perhaps you’d all like to pause and sing along with me and a very young Christian Bale:

The NYT did a nice piece about the genesis of the musical and it’s relation to the source material. The best revelation? Most of the characters names in the show (Crutchy Morris, Racetrack Higgins, Spot Conlon) were the real names of the strikers.

So in their honor, it’s an all news-themed Quick Takes.

— 2 —

It’s no match for scrappy youngsters wearing vests, but I really like this video made by The Guardian to highlight the way reporting doesn’t just convey the news, it makes the news.

— 3 —

And now, to highlight some excellent journalism. Foreign Policy recently had a great piece on Patrick Ball — a statistician who analyzes human migrations and testifies in genocide trials.

Since the 1984 publication of Nunca Más, the report of Argentina’s National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons — the first modern truth commission — information about the toll of war and political repression has been routinely collected on a massive scale. Truth commissions from Chile to East Timor have gathered testimonies from tens of thousands of people, a process designed to provide dignity to the victims, identify crimes that require justice or restitution, and write the story of what happened — to try, as much as possible, to give closure to the past. Today, technology has speeded up and broadened the reporting process: Crowdsourced mapping tools collect and plot thousands of text messages from people who have witnessed violence. Ordinary people with cell phones take pictures and videos of atrocities that are uploaded and seen around the world.

But possessing an ocean of testimony is not the same as knowing the truth. No matter how many cases we learn of, they might not be representative of the whole. A truth commission might be scorned by a particular linguistic or ethnic group, which means its members don’t come forward to speak. Fewer media reports of killings might actually mean fewer killings — or it could mean that journalists were intimidated into silence. Human rights groups might record a decline in violence because budget cuts forced them to fire half their outreach team. Rape might never be disclosed. Video collected by cell phones tells us only what was witnessed by people with cell phones.

It’s statistical methods that help you figure out if your data is skewed and how you can compensate for it. Ball’s research has undergirded many human rights stories, and I’m so pleased that FP singled it out for coverage in its own right.

— 4 —

And speaking of statistics, here’s a fun exercise: can you see any problems with the graph below?

Mike Flynn does a thorough take-down at this blog, but the gist that you should be very suspicious when someone shows you a linear relation that seems to mostly be shaped by a group of anomalous data points (the data circa 2008).

To add to Flynn’s critique: you want to be especially careful with this kind of graph when you’re plotting your data against a time-series. For a lot of other independent variables, you might reasonably expect their relation to the variable you’re studying is continuous — i.e. that small changes in your independent variable (for example: number of students per class) result in small changes in your dependent variable (amount of time that the teacher spends individually with each student).

But when you’re looking at time-series data, the passing of time is really confounded with a lot of other factors (economic conditions, wars, new scientific discoveries, etc) which can change suddenly. So a small change in time can correspond to a big shift in the variables that are actually shaping your outcome, and it may be unreasonable to expect a linear relationship in the first place.

— 5 —

Note: the above was totally still relevant to the stated theme of news because data drives news! And if journalists can’t spot bad statistics, their reporting will be flawed! And unworthy of being featured in these themed Takes!

Luckily, some journalists are also major wonks, and one of my favorites in that genre is Ezra Klein of the Washington Post. He recently wrote a good book review/meditation on the role of money in politics for The New York Review of Books. Here’s a preview:

In other words, lobbyists act like a volunteer, and highly skilled, army for politicians who already agree with them.

This is the most benign, generous explanation of lobbying, but it does not render the practice innocent. In this model, the point of lobbyists is not so much to change votes as to change the legislative agenda. Perhaps you are a legislator interested both in reforming the nation’s drug laws and in cutting taxes on large corporations. If you focus your time on tax cuts for large corporations, you’ll get an enormous amount of money, aid, and attention from lobbyists. If you spend your time on drug policy, you’ll be ignored and your campaign will be underfunded. The disparity is even greater on smaller issues where there may not be another side to engage the debate: if a group of paper companies spends a couple of million dollars hiring lobbyists to persuade politicians of the merits of a change to an obscure provision of the tax code that will net the paper companies a couple of billion dollars, there is likely no one on the other side of that issue amassing materials to explain why this change isn’t a good idea.

— 6 —

And if you’d like to make a satorial statement in support of newspapers, perhaps you’ll like this tutorial for a newsprint manicure:

— 7 —

Finally, just a reminder that you can vote once per day for the About.com Atheism Awards. I’m one of five nominees for Best Atheist Blog. More details here.

For more Quick Takes, visit Conversion Diary!

7 Quick Takes

at the theatre

Previous Post

March 14, 2012

Won't Someone Think of the Children?

Next Post

March 16, 2012 Caution! Philosophy in Progress.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wrote of a new covenant where God's law would be written not on stone but where?

Select your answer to see how you score.

In a book On scrolls On their hearts In the temple