Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unequally Yoked

Hoist on my own (Virtual) Petard?

Last updated on: November 27, 2012 at 11:54 am   by Leah Libresco

Hoist on my own (Virtual) Petard? 2012-11-27T11:54:02-05:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week, I was ragging on people who deny meaning in this life or put all their focus on a questionable world to come, and deisach wondered in the comments if I might havc neglected the beam in my own eye:

“the idea of enlightenment as total disregard for the world you live in”

May I ask, how does this apply to your support for transhumanism (as I think you said you support it)?

Pardon me if my notion is the clichéd notion that you do not hold, but how is your hypothetical computer simulation world all that greatly different from the idea of uploading one’s consciousness into some form of computer storage, unmoored from a physical body, and then being able to manipulate and create one’s own reality? The dangers of the simulated world are separate from the actual dangers, that is, you can decide to either play by the rules of the simulation or ignore those rules as to whether or not fire burns or water drowns, but that has nothing to do with actual threats to your existence such as if the storage is corrupted or someone in meatspace pulls the power cord out of the socket.

This is a difficult question for me as a quasi-gnostic who doesn’t see physical existence as particularly important.  I should say first that I’m mostly interested in transhumanism for the near-future possibilities (developing new senses, thinking more about human-machine interaction, not getting complacent about the transhumanist changes that have been around a while).  I’m not counting down til the day I get my robot or sim-body.

I doubt any of those opportunities will occur in my lifetime, if they happen at all, but if I had the opportunity to upload, I’m not sure what I would do.   My pro-transhumanist beliefs don’t lead me to embrace every radical modification for the sake of rejecting our flawed bodies and minds.  I’m just trying to get people who object to these changes to offer up more of a reason than ‘It’s inhuman!”   Tell me why it’s bad for people, because there’s plenty of evolutionary detritus that is very bad for us and very human.

At this moment, I’d lean against humans uploading en masse.  (I’m not opposed to some daring souls doing it themselves in the same spirit as a one-way trip to Mars).  I suspect it would be bad for us morally.  As deisach said, if everyone in a simulation knows they’re in a simulation, every choice you make feels less weighty.  And, even though we may have a duty to care for all people and work for their good, it gets a lot harder to think of them when we don’t see them.

Think back to the problem of drone warfare and possible alienation from moral judgement.  Or, if you’d like a more classic example, consider that, in the Milgram experiments, subjects were less likely to shock the other participant when they could see them, instead of just hearing them.  They were even less likely to run through the full course of shocks when both participants were in the same room.  Anything that makes people feel less real is a moral hazard.

I may want people to put less emphasis on physical proximity and physical similarity, but ignoring the facts will only put people at risk.  As a transhumanist (and a not-so-soft paternalist), I use these data to try to hack my brain.  That could be anything from just keeping in mind that proximity is a weak point in human moral reasoning and reminding myself to stay on guard to avoiding making big decisions that affect others if I’m by myself and can’t see other people.

Here’s the takeaway: my fascination with transhumanism is less about abandoning the body as an end-in-itself.  My goal is to chip away at reverence for the body-as-it-is so we’re more comfortable studying how it leads us astray and making any helpful and feasible modifications.

And also implanting LEDs anywhere that seems fun.

 

P.S. It’s possible that a lot of these moral concerns would be moot if everyone didn’t know they were running in a computer, but I’m really not clear on what goal would justify secret uploading.  All I’m coming up with is beta-testing (unethical) and environmental conservation (a sledgehammer to hit a nail), so I’m inclined to treat that case as mostly irrelevant.

Morality in Practice

transhumanism

Previous Post



December 3, 2011

Too Sucky To Be True

Next Post



December 8, 2011 Simulated Ethics and Brainmodding


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I brought musicians and singers to serve before the ark, establishing worship in Israel. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon Heman Asaph David

Related posts from Unequally Yoked

Catholic

The Tony-Winning Guide To Temptation And Grace

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Hedgehogs of Redemption and the Comedy of Grace

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Mercy, Justice, and How To Tell The Difference

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Pinning down *which* error is made in this...

Unequally Yoked

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube