The Continuation of Philosophy by Other Means

Last updated on: November 3, 2012 at 9:39 pm by Leah Libresco

The Continuation of Philosophy by Other Means 2012-11-03T21:39:11-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A post on science fiction and religion? Don’t mind if I do! (And how apropos to find this on the day when, according to Amazon, my new copy of Michael Flynn’s Eifelheim is out for delivery).

Long story short, Steve Davidson of Grasping for the Wind wrote a post explaining why he thinks that “Religion, at its core, is a concept antithetical to the core concepts of science fiction.” He gives a fuller explanation at the site, complete with examples, but I’ve tried to capture the gist of it in the blockquote below:

Science fiction – all of it – is founded on the premise that science (observation, fact, hypothesis and theory) is the fundamental underpinning of all that is and all that ever will be.

Religion on the other hand, putting the best possible face on it, wants us to believe that science has its place (is even useful at times) but is subordinate to some higher power that can flaunt science’s reason and logic whenever and wherever it so chooses, without requiring explanation.

How can these two NOT be at odds within works that begin with the premise that science works?

…If you dig deep enough in any work of science fiction that includes religious elements, you will find that where the two interact, religion always comes off second best, and I don’t see how it could be otherwise.

Science fiction is the expression of the triumph of reason, logic and the tenets of the scientific method over a mysterious and little understood universe.

At its core, religion holds the view that there IS an answer to everything (no matter how convoluted or dissatisfying the answer may be ).

As a scifi fan in good standing, I don’t buy this definition. To begin with, science fiction is not conventionally understood to be about charting the unambiguous success of science. If it were, Dresden Codak’s “Caveman Science Fiction” cartoon (excerpted at top) wouldn’t be so instantly recognizable and so funny. Science fiction can be about human limitations and, yes, even about the limitations of logic and reason. I can wait here while you try Eliezer Yudkowsky’s Three Worlds Collide.

I don’t think of science fiction as the victory lap of the geeks. To me, it’s fascinating because it’s the continuation of philosophy by other means. Science fiction takes humans (or reasoning beings sufficiently close for some sense of kinship) and puts them under strange new stresses. Science fiction (and fantasy) take us out of ourselves. They let us think about our relationships with others, our duties, what telos we have in an environment with the power to jolt us out of our cached thoughts.

Admittedly, some examples of the genre don’t make the best use of the powers at their disposal

Fiction, generally, can do this, too — letting us approximate a different frame of reference. One thing that strikes me as unique about science fiction and fantasy, though, is that they let us do this in a very low-stakes setting. Because the worlds we’re exploring are so alien, we have to make an effort to carry back any new ideas to our day-to-day life. That distance lowers the threat and terror of new, heterodox ideas. We can go farther with our gedankenexperiments when we’re far enough removed from their consequences that we can comfortably noodle around without being scared of what we’re exploring.

Unlike some highly abstract philosophy thought experiments, science fiction is pitched to be accessible and challenging to everyone. And unlike the philosophy-for-the-public types of trolleyology problem, the problems of science fiction are compelling and fiercely urgent once they suck us in. (In fact they’re so mentally sticky, they can induce new kinds of bias, but Yudkowsky’s already written that post).

So I’m not surprised to see that science fiction leads some authors to work over the questions they’re exploring in their theology or metaphysics. (And I recommend “The Way of Cross and Dragon” if you can find it in an anthology). Religion is part of the answer to how people deal with uncertainty, as well as ethics, as well as problems of external moral order. If you want scifi that tackles those problems, expect some characters to be at least quasi-religious (or a really good bit of backstory from the author explaining how they died out). Cause if you strip out those problems entirely, you’re probably only leaving in the robots and explosions.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

**I’m sure someone wants to know how I differentiate between science fiction and fantasy, if I’m using the fantastical setting framework. I was going to give an explanation here, but it started getting long, so I promise a full post on that next. Feel free to share your own definitions in the comments.

Epistemology/Philosophy

thinking through fiction

Previous Post

September 7, 2011

On Getting Out of the Religion Game

Next Post

September 9, 2011 7 Quick Science Takes (9/9/11)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the first plague in Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hail Water turning to blood Darkness Frogs