Sneaky Critiques

Last updated on: November 3, 2012 at 9:30 pm by Leah Libresco

Sneaky Critiques 2012-11-03T21:30:32-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

With so many reasons to oppose Rick Santorum’s candidacy, I’m disappointed at the justification offered by one commenter at The Daily Dish. S/he wrote:

This is only a half-formed idea, but as I watched Santorum engage the Penn State students, I couldn’t help but wonder if candidate Santorum is really bad for Catholics. He seems to be suggesting that he’s been persecuted for his dogmatic following of the Church’s teachings. Nevermind that a thinking person and someone trying to be the leader of the free world should be able to construct personal values that differ from a wider belief system and still participate in that belief system, but isn’t he just reinforcing the problem that American voters have always had with Catholic candidates? [emphasis added]

Sullivan sums this up a worry that Santorum will be “tak[ing] calls from the Pope in the Oval Office.” There are a lot of public policy issues where I wouldn’t like to see the Catholic Church win out, but this particular criticism seems strange.

The commenter seems to be going after Santorum for a lack of intellectual legwork. Surely, if he’d come to his own decisions, he wouldn’t be wholly in agreement with any institution. He’d be his own man, a leader, a maverick. If the fact that Santorum’s agreement with the Church in all his positions is a liability, should I like him better if he deviated on one, no matter the form of his deviation? Obviously not.

No one should get points simple for not matching a preexisting mold. What I care about is the results of his positions, not whether they accord with a third party checklist. This kind of rhetoric is a way to slam the beliefs of an opponent without actually having to explain your critique. It’s just a faux-high minded iteration of normal political sniping.

If you believe Santorum is actually following the instructions of the Church without reflection, and you do not believe the Church is an inspired institution, Santorum will inevitably be led into error, which you can then attack on its merits. Don’t talk vaguely about how agreement and loyalty betray a lack of critical thinking, prove it by showing his policy positions (however he arrived at them) are insupportable by anyone with data and a lick of common sense.

I’ve seen this trick of attacking people for agreement instead of the merits of the thing agreed upon used by other pundits and commenters, and I think it’s lazy and low. Well, I suppose it would be an appropriate line of critique if what these people really fear is that the Pope is going to give Santorum mutable and unpredictable marching orders, creating a whole new kind of regulatory uncertainty. Maybe they should try lobbying the US Chamber of Congress to take up their cause.

P.S. Of course, most of these concerns are moot, since there’s not a snowball’s chance Santorum will win the nomination. As proof beyond the polling numbers: I went googling for a Santorum-related political cartoon related to his faith and found almost bupkis. Looks like the cartoonists, if not the pundits, know a dead campaign when they see one.

Epistemology/Philosophy

church/state

Previous Post

September 1, 2011

7 Quick Vid Takes (9/2/11)

Next Post

September 5, 2011 Happy Labor Day!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm begins, "The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 139 Psalm 91 Psalm 27 Psalm 14