Handling Sexism Among Skeptics

Last updated on: October 13, 2012 at 6:38 pm by Leah Libresco

Handling Sexism Among Skeptics 2012-10-13T18:38:05-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a continuation of a post from this morning about an incident of possible harassment at a skepticism conference. Read that one FIRST.

Even among people who agreed that not all harassment has to result in physical assault to be threatening and dangerous, there was a lot of disagreement about the appropriate way to handle the incident and the ongoing discussion in the atheist blogosphere. Some of the people I disagree with have premises about privilege and gender that are too out of touch with reality to productively address, but even some broadly pro-feminism bloggers went seriously wrong. I’m excerpting a recent post on this topic by Friendly Atheist, but for the sake of fairness, you should read the whole thing.

“[Watson’s public attack on a specific atheist who criticized her] was bad form for two reasons. One, it was a distraction from an otherwise important talk. Instead of us discussing the incredibly important issue of how the Religious Right harms women (the subject of the talk), we’re all discussing whether it’s right for someone with a big megaphone to pick on someone with a smaller one, whether someone was being a “bad feminist,” and all sorts of shit that doesn’t need to be aired in public…

Maybe everyone has forgotten: We’re all on the same goddamn side. We’re supposed to be the rational ones. That means we should know how to discuss things privately before they become a public spectacle where no one wins. We should always encourage more atheists to speak up with their opinions, not shy away from it, because we’re the ones who know how to handle differences in opinion. No one’s saying “Keep quiet if you disagree.” It’s the opposite of that, only more tactful.”

The broadest point first: It’s important to have these discussions in public especially if you’re of the opinion the man who frightened Watson made an honest mistake. Private conversations with the specific offender leave everyone else still in the dark.

Now on to the more specific issue: I don’t believe all atheists/skeptics can be meaningfully said to all be on the same side. Atheists don’t have a communal creed and don’t even all come to atheism through skepticism. Usually, we’re a coalition of bootleggers and baptists – we’ve come to the same conclusion, but for wildly disparate reasons, so it’s no surprise that there’s a lot we disagree on.

It’s possible to have a solely tactical discussion about balancing the relative harm done by acknowledging not all atheists are saints and having a public brouhaha about harassment versus allowing bad behavior to go unpoliced in order not to lose ground against a greater threat from religion, but I don’t think Hemant was thinking in terms of utilitarian calculus. Instead of sly cynicism, I think he’s succumbed to excessive optimism.

I don’t have any particular confidence that atheists en masse or within the blogosphere can easily work out our differences without spectacle. In fact, our varied beliefs can make it a lot harder, since we’re less likely to all be speaking the same language than a religious group with a common tradition and set of references.

Our fights are always going to be disorganized and difficult, so, when we think they’re important, they may as well be public, so we can try to persuade and learn from as many people as possible. But we’d do best to remember how little we have in common and try to be patient and charitable through the confusion that’s sure to follow.

Atheism

atheism as community

feminism and the family

Previous Post

July 3, 2011

Sexism Among Skeptics

Next Post

July 4, 2011 The Turing Test Begins

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Emmanuel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God is Judge God is Peace God with Us God is Righteous