Keeping a Civil Tongue

Last updated on: October 8, 2012 at 5:14 pm by Leah Libresco

Keeping a Civil Tongue 2012-10-08T17:14:11-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A couple comment threads have gotten a little nasty/unproductive lately, so I want to jump in and try to reestablish some expectations of productive dialogue. Before I do, I want to give two bits of information up front.

I don’t censor comments and that’s not changing. I only delete comments that are spam unrelated to the site. Google’s overenthusiastic spam filter may delay your comment for a few hours, but I will always let it through once I get back to Blogger. That means you’re free to ignore anything that follows in this post and it won’t impact your commenting abilities, but I hope you don’t. The problem isn’t that bad commenters victimize me or readers, it’s that when you get nasty, you usually end up delegitimizing your argument and discouraging people from engaging with you (there’s a reason that this post is tagged ‘handing weapons to your enemies‘).

I’m not trying to single out any particular commenter here. The problem has bothered me more of late, so I’m going to talk about a recent thread in this post. That’s not to say that the thread I’m using as an example is the nadir of conversation here or I have a general problem with some of the people participating in it. It was just ready at hand.

Ok. Those warnings out of the way, let’s talk about what’s going on in “Call him Voldemort!” (the thread on HPV vaccination) and the problems that surfaced.

Don’t slam the kids/Keep ad hominem to a minimum.

When a discussion about parenting comes up, it’s reasonable to talk about how choices affect the well being of children, but don’t go overboard. It’s fine to talk about general trends and statistics for certain upbringing styles, but I sure didn’t like seeing speculation about the future sexual activities of Kaczor’s children. Still worse was the glee or self-satisfaction that seemed to tinge some predictions of their ruin.

That kind of talk is unnecessary and unkind. If you have data or a clear chain of logic, let that speak for you, but don’t write anything that would make you ashamed if the target or his children stumbled across your post.

It’s ridiculous to imagine you’ve got a clear insight into someone’s character and worth from one 1000 word essay. The only person with personal knowledge of Kaczor or his kids in that thread was K.L., and she was right to try to quash the unpleasantness.

It’s fine to be anonymous.

I don’t mind when anyone comments on this blog anonymously (there’s a reason I configured the blog to allow it) and I don’t assign a credibility hit to any commenter based on the choice to use a pseudonym, a private Blogger profile, etc. Religion can be a fraught topic and it’s completely reasonable (and non-suspicious) to try to keep a boss or any casual Googler from getting their first impression of you based on some comments you made in a long running thread on a controversial issue. (P.S. I am screwed w/r/t that last one.)

If you want to say something inflammatory, take to time to explain yourself.

During the thread, Anonymous claimed misleading a child about the purpose of a vaccine was analogous to rape. And man did things go downhill from there.

I, like many commenters, was flabbergasted by the comparison, so it took me a while to understand the logic behind the comparison. In fact, I’m probably mostly in agreement with Anonymous about the terrible consequences of misleading people to subvert their bodily autonomy, especially when this abuse is justified by the limited understanding of the victim.

Perhaps the point would have registered better if the analogy stayed in the same genre as its target (think the Tuskegee study, or just the way doctors used to defer to a woman’s husband or father when making medical decisions). But, one way or another, the galvanizing comparison led both sides to think of each other as totally unreasonable, and then the cusswords and personal insults started flying and the germane point was lost.

All of these problems distract people from the substance of your argument and give them an excuse to stop listening to you. If you want to convince them, you’re doing it wrong. If you just want to troll/torment them, take a look back at yesterday’s post on vengeance.

Debate Tactics

Housekeeping

comment policy

handing weapons to the enemy

Previous Post

June 10, 2011

7 Quick Takes (6/10/11)

Next Post

June 13, 2011 Time Out for Tonys

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God confuse to stop the Tower of Babel from being finished?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The people’s language The weather Their tools The bricks