Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unequally Yoked

If You Can’t Say Something Helpful…

Last updated on: October 9, 2012 at 10:59 am   by Leah Libresco

If You Can’t Say Something Helpful… 2012-10-09T10:59:38-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sometimes, when I complain about certain kinds of rhetoric used by atheist leaders, I think I’m not being clear enough.  When I complain about people who are tarred as ‘angry atheists’ I don’t have a problem with feelings of frustration and urgency — there’s a lot to be upset about.

So instead getting sucked into condemning anger — a rhetorical trick that delegitimizes any strongly expressed critique of the status quo — let’s say I have a problem with choler.

Choler was one of the four humors.  It’s also known as yellow bile and biliousness, wrath, and irascible bad temper are exactly what it was thought to produce.  What I’m trying to speak against is the practice of just venting our spleens and then patting ourselves on the back as though we made an impression or any kind of argument at all.  Let me give an example.

P.Z. Myers is an excellent biologist and is very good at presenting cogent debunkings of anti-evolution arguments, but his confrontational reputation and the attention it draws seems to push him to pick dumber fights.  I thought one of his recent twitter fights (pasted below) was a puerile waste of time, and then Myers compounded the fault by promoting it to his followers as though he scored a coup.

I’m not posting about Quinn’s tone because I don’t care about it.  If Christians want to be have unproductive  fights on twitter, I’ve got no skin in the game.  As an atheist, I am personally affected by the rhetoric used by the most prominent atheists and the expectations they create.

Although a reply to Quinn’s question was certainly in order, I can’t fathom what the point of the rest of the conversation was.  I doubt Myers thought that Quinn was being persuaded and the glib, character-limited back and forth doesn’t read as though it’s meant to appeal to fencesitters.  It seems like Myers is sticking with the fight for the pleasure of getting to call someone stupid in a public forum.  That kind of indulgence alienates the people who might otherwise be inclined to listen to Myers’s substantive arguments.

Atheism

Debate Tactics

handing weapons to the enemy

Previous Post



June 19, 2011

Update on Church Vandalism Fundraising

Next Post



June 21, 2011 Improve Schisms, Don't Close Them


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wrote of a new covenant where God's law would be written not on stone but where?

Select your answer to see how you score.

In a book On scrolls On their hearts In the temple

Related posts from Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Starting Conversations During Francis's Visit

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Desiring Abundance of Life, Not Just Absence of...

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Why Not Refer to ISIS by an Epithet?

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Life Lessons that Can't be Taught at College's...

Unequally Yoked

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube