How Can You Believe That?

Last updated on: October 8, 2012 at 4:52 pm by Leah Libresco

How Can You Believe That? 2012-10-08T16:52:24-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

During my guest stint at Daylight Atheism, I expressed pity for Harold Camping’s deluded followers and sparked a debate on whether his beliefs were so stupid as to be self-refuting. If the beliefs couldn’t be rationally supported, then presumably the ‘victims’ were willfully deluding themselves in order to take part in a con or for some other malign purpose. I was dubious, since I’m not one to ever underestimate the Dunning-Kruger effect (sufficiently ignorant/stupid people can’t spot their own mistakes).

In a follow-up thread, some of the commenters raised a different, more weighty objection. Leaving aside the stupidity of the justification for the Rapture prediction, some readers thought that the moral implications of Rapture-oriented theology (most people consigned to hell-on-earth during the Tribulation, followed by actual Hell) made them untenable. By this logic, sticking with these beliefs doesn’t just reveal a tolerance of a paradox (a good God who damns almost everyone), it betrays a callousness disregard for others. In this light, it’s easier to claim that Camping’s followers deserve humiliation or to lose their money.

I remain skeptical about this tack of argument. Turning over the question, I was reminded of a comment posted by Dylan some time ago, on a thread that had devolved into one of those Crusades vs Stalin arguments. He wrote:

I actually read through this entire argument (and I’ve read more Marx than the Communist Manifesto, thank you very much), but I find it rather boring. Is either side actually prepared to be consequentialist in choosing what beliefs to adopt and spread? That is to say, if I convince Publius atheistic societies are less violent, etc., I doubt he’ll stop believing in God. Similarly, I don’t think convincing Matt that theistic societies are less violent will make him start. It’s the rare theist or atheist who maintains (or at least admits to maintaining) such a consequentialist epistemology (one such rare example, ironically, was the great “deontologist” Immanuel Kant).

There’s a substantive difference between Camping’s followers, who mostly seemed sorrowful about the fate of the unbelievers left behind and the members of the Westboro Baptist Church, who take a gleeful joy in our impending fate. The WBC never spends much time trying to persuade people to convert or offering them a way out. In contrast, the Camping followers embarked on increasingly desperate and frenzied attempts at evangelization as their deadline approached.

If people’s beliefs point them toward some horrific conclusion about the world, it’s not necessarily reasonable to expect them to abandon it, and their persistence in belief does not necessarily betray a moral failing. It’s worth examining the way they respond to that belief. Do they try to ameliorate the pain they fear, or do they rejoice in the suffering of others? Do they try to examine the evidence for their belief, hoping they might be mistaken or do they accept the suffering of others complacently?

If you don’t have time to pick apart all the data that led your interlocutor to his untenable belief, you can still make use of it in argument. These theories can blossom into doubt about God’s benevolence, much like any question of theodicy, but soteriological questions are harder to wave aside. They can’t be easily dismissed as a confusing part of God’s ineffable plan.

In some ways, it may be easier to get a Christian to abandon an erroneous horrifying belief than it would be to persuade someone like me. We atheists have no guarantor that we live in a bearable universe.

Epistemology/Philosophy

Previous Post

June 4, 2011

Call him Voldemort!

Next Post

June 9, 2011 "So they feel as scared and hurt as I do"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Bathsheba's husband, sent to the front lines by David?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Absalom Uriah the Hittite Abner Joab