Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unequally Yoked

Desecration Follow-up: Considering the Context

Last updated on: September 17, 2012 at 8:18 pm   by Leah Libresco

Desecration Follow-up: Considering the Context 2012-09-17T20:18:54-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m reprinting a comment Ebonmuse of Daylight Atheism made on my post criticizing P.Z. Myers in full here.  I thought it needed a response so I’m treating it as a semi-guest post.  Ebonmuse’s comments are in the blockquote, my response appears below:

To understand fully why PZ did what he did, you have to be aware of the context.

In this case, the context was that a Florida college student, Webster Cook, who was raised Catholic, attended a Catholic mass on his campus, went to the altar to receive communion, and took a small piece of the Eucharist back to his seat with the intention of showing it to a non-Catholic friend who’d come to the service with him. When he tried to leave the vicinity of the altar without fully consuming the wafer, he was obstructed, grabbed and physically assaulted by other churchgoers (according to his account, one woman grabbed his wrist and tried to pry his fingers open).

He left the service with the wafer, and as word spread, he started receiving angry protests and death threats from Catholics. They posted his address, phone number and other personal information online. They demanded that he be disciplined by the school (for what?), that he kicked off the student council, that he be expelled from the university, that he be arrested and charged with theft. A local priest compared the situation to the kidnapping of a loved one. William Donohue said it was “beyond hate speech”. The area diocese called it a “hate crime”. The college dispatched armed police officers to stand guard during the next mass in order to, one presumes, enforce Catholic views as to how wafers should be treated.

Upon hearing about this deluge of insanity, PZ was outraged, as well he might have been. He invited readers to send him a communion wafer in order to demonstrate, by a symbolic act of protest, that wafers aren’t people, can’t be harmed, and should not enjoy the same degree of legal protection that we grant to human beings. It was a demonstration that Catholic religious views aren’t, and shouldn’t be, granted special or privileged status in our law.

Ok, I hope it’s obvious to everyone that the Christians who sent death threats to the kid are behaving badly.  I hope it’s also clear that bad behavior does not justify other bad behavior, even if you are technically behaving better than your antagonists.  P.Z. Myers still deliberately set out to desecrate something that other people found sacred, and he tried to do it as publicly and contemptuously as possible, in order to be maximally offensive.  I hope it’s an obvious point that Myers behaved in a cruel and generally unacceptable way.

So the question is whether his goals justified this objectionable end — whether this was the best way to oppose the threats of violence from the other side.  I still say no.

Destroying the wafer does not prove that transubstantiation isn’t real or that the wafer cannot be harmed, so Myers is not convincing Catholics that their beliefs are false.  Catholic theology doesn’t say that Myers cannot desecrate a wafer, only that he should not.  Therefore, Myers’s stunt does not change Catholic minds about the power of the Eucharist and will not forestall another strong defensive reaction if another consecrated wafer was stolen.

I don’t buy the argument that this was a great way to rebuke the legal system for privileging Catholic perspectives either.  The display clearly targeted Catholics, not lawyers or legislators.  If Myers wanted to organize support to overturn specific laws, he could point his legion of readers towards petitions and PACs, but I really doubt that a congressperson’s office saw his desecration and realized that it was time to publically oppose the use of public funds for Catholic-run orphanages that refuse to place children with gay families.  Myers didn’t cite any legal problems that his protest was meant to target, which was just as well, since I doubt those causes would have welcomed the association.

The desecration didn’t disprove Catholicism and it didn’t help atheist legal battles.  It did make a lot of crazy people crazier and deeply hurt a lot of decent people.  Not worth it.  What did this offensive act achieve in defense of Webster Cook?

Atheism

Debate Tactics

blasphemy

pz myers

Previous Post



February 11, 2011

7 Quick Takes (2/11/11)

Next Post



February 11, 2011 Is it so hard not to desecrate a Eucharist?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prepared Jesus' body for burial?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph of Arimathea Mary the Mother of Jesus Roman Centurions Peter, James, and John

Related posts from Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Starting Conversations During Francis's Visit

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Desiring Abundance of Life, Not Just Absence of...

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Why Not Refer to ISIS by an Epithet?

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Life Lessons that Can't be Taught at College's...

Unequally Yoked

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube