Quick Update on Justin Martyr and Gay Marriage

Last updated on: August 25, 2012 at 1:58 pm by Leah Libresco

Quick Update on Justin Martyr and Gay Marriage 2012-08-25T13:58:01-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I quite appreciate how quickly he responded to the questions I raised in my last post. (I’ll also confess to being totally envious of how quick his post-turnaround-time is. Meanwhile, I’ve got a stack of epidemiology homework sitting by the computer looking at me plaintively). I’ll be responding sometime later today, but in the meantime, head on over and check out his responses:

Pinging Leah Part 1: Justin responds to my questions on adoption and my free rider argument.

“I think the free rider argument is quite weak. Individual people have an intellectual duty to hold consistent beliefs, but politics is the result of bargaining between interest and ideological groups. So marriage confers an incoherent mishmash of financial benefits (and penalties). I think one could plausibly argue that all of these benefits are designed to help make life easier for cash-strapped parents. Even the ones that don’t have anything to do with children per se. But let’s say they don’t. My position is still coherent. Marriage should provide tax credits for children. Dual-income no kids couples do not need tax credits. I also think that single people (and perhaps gays – I still do not have a fully formed position on gay adoption) who adopt should also be entitled to these benefits.”

Pinging Leah Part 2: Justin sets out a set of hypotheticals for me to evaluate.

“In our previous debate on the existence of God we had an interchange in the comments that segued to gay marriage. I asked you if there was ever a case in which you would oppose allowing couples to intentionally procreate. You did not answer me then, but I think I have your full attention on gay marriage now.
…Are you opposed to any of these? If so, then how do you place that in a reflective equilibrium with your support for gay marriage? (By reflective equilibrium, I would like to see a principle or list of principles which can be applied in a non ad hoc way to all these cases.) “

Click through to read his full remarks and to mix it up in the comments section! Heaven knows I will be.

Debates

gay marriage

Previous Post

September 8, 2010

Poking my nose into Justin Martyr's gay marriage debate

Next Post

September 10, 2010 7 Quick Takes (9/10/10)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Philemon, what does Paul call Onesimus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

My helper My friend My very heart My brother