Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
Why We Keep Needing Noah’s Ark Found

Why We Keep Needing Noah’s Ark Found

Last updated on: October 19, 2026 at 1:38 pm by Eric Scot English

0 Comments

Why We Keep Needing Noah’s Ark Found 2026-10-19T13:38:52-04:00 Eric Scot English

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Durupinar hill Credit: Wiki Commons

Noah’s big boat is back in the news again. This time, Christian archaeologists are attempting to use the latest technology to identify what is inside the Durupinar hill.

You might be surprised to learn that Ark hunting goes all the way back to at least 275 BC and was an endeavor embarked on by the Babylonian priest and historian Berossus the Chaldean (c. 275 BC). Through the ages, people have been fascinated by finding this boat, but why?

This may surprise you, but if I am being honest, a little part of me is hoping they will find some evidence.

I should say that first, because it is the thing most Christians following this story will not admit about themselves. A boat on a hillside in eastern Turkey, 29 kilometers from Mount Ararat, would move ancient biblical stories closer to reality. I feel the pull. I also think that pull is exactly where we get into trouble.

Consider David Fasold. In 1985, he walked up to the Durupınar site, took one look, and declared it a shipwreck. He was a salvage expert, and he knew wrecks. He brought radar and a homemade “frequency generator,” and in 1988 he wrote a book making the case. In 1994, he stood on the same hill beside an Australian geologist and decided he had been wrong. Two years later he co-wrote a paper with geologist Lorence Collins titled “Bogus ‘Noah’s Ark’ from Turkey Exposed as a Common Geologic Structure”. In 1997 he told an Australian court the claim was rubbish.

And then, according to his biographer, he went back to believing. No matter what the experts told him, she says, he stayed convinced until he died.

I do not think Fasold was a fraud. I think he suffered from confirmation bias. He wanted the location to be the Ark’s resting place so badly he convinced himself despite the empirical evidence. That is a far more common condition than fraud, and far more dangerous, because from the inside it feels exactly like faith.

What is actually in the hill

The story of the hill is shorter than the legend. Rain and earthquakes stripped the mud off the ridge in 1948. A Turkish army captain named İlhan Durupınar spotted it on a NATO mapping photo in 1959, and a 1960 expedition dug into it, dynamited it, and found dirt and rock. Then an amateur explorer named Ron Wyatt took it up in 1977 and, with Fasold, produced an iron bracket, petrified gopherwood, and anchor stones. All three have been taken apart. The bracket is weathered volcanic mineral, the gopherwood is metamorphosed peridotite, and the anchor stones are local andesite [1].

The explanation geologists keep giving is dull, which may be why it keeps losing. Collins says it is a fold in sedimentary layers. Turkish geologist Murat Avcı says a slab of limestone slid down the mountain on an earthflow. Eşref Atabey, writing for Turkey’s Mineral Research and Exploration Directorate in 2025, says landslide [2]. This is not an atheist plot. The skeptics include the creationist Andrew Snelling and Fasold himself.

Now there is a new team. Noah’s Ark Scans is privately funded, Christian organization, led by Andrew Jones [3]. This year it drilled at more than a dozen spots, some about 60 feet deep, and reports no bedrock, only dark soil and mud, with boulders at some sites. One drill bit snapped at four or five meters. A soil survey found three times more organic matter inside the formation than outside [4]. A radar report released this month says the structure is not geological [5]. None of it has been peer-reviewed.

Run each piece through the landslide explanation and watch what happens. A slab resting on earthflow debris gives you mud, boulders, and no bedrock. A bit that breaks has hit something harder than limestone, and wood is softer than limestone. Organic matter piles up in any slope soil. Jones himself concedes that even ancient wood would not prove a human built the thing, and he told Newsweek that no wood has been identified [6]. Yet the team’s own release says the radar confirms the formation is not geological.

The older talking points fare no better. The seashells at 6,500 feet are uplifted seabed, and Collins found a fossil-bearing limestone bed cutting straight across the formation, which would put any flood deposit after the Ark.

Soil results are due this winter. If dated, hand-cut timbers come back, I will write a different article. I do not expect to.

What we are really hunting

I have argued before that when God becomes an idea, people reach for the safest and most controllable contact with the divine they can find. For many, that is the Bible. It becomes not just authoritative but idolized, because it is easier to cling to a text than to surrender to a living God who speaks and confronts.

A boat is safer still. A boat does not speak. It does not challenge anyone. It sits in a hill and tells us we were right but does nothing in and of itself to transform us. And, for some, being right is more important than transformation.

This is why the hunt never ends, even when the evidence does. Astronaut James Irwin, an Ark hunter himself, and the creationist John Morris both looked at this hill in the 1980s and walked away unconvinced. The search simply moved. It always does, and each new location arrives with the same certainty as the last. People who have been burned by a dead end rarely conclude that the search was the problem.

The wanting is old. Thomas told the other disciples he would not believe until he touched the wounds. Jesus gave him what he asked for, and then called blessed the people who have not seen and yet believe (John 20:25-29). Israel had the same problem with a bronze serpent Moses made at God’s command (Numbers 21:8-9). Centuries later King Hezekiah broke it into pieces and called it Nehushtan, because the people were burning incense to it (2 Kings 18:4). A real object, made at God’s direction, had become the thing they worshipped in place of the God who commanded it.

The real danger is not in finding out that there is nothing there, but that there is.

But there is still a cost when the find fails to appear. A faith staked on a boat has two exits. You keep moving the search, or you decide the Bible was wrong. Both treat the truth of Scripture as a matter of what turns up in the dirt. And that is the quiet tragedy of it. Many do not hunger for truth; they hunger for comfort, and an Ark on a hillside is comfort with a research budget.

Final Thoughts

That is why I keep one eye on my own wanting. I know the pull because I feel it, and what it offers is relief from having to trust. Proof would let me stop leaning. It would let me stop surrendering to a God I cannot hold. That is the very definition of idolatry.

If the lab results come back empty or inconclusive this winter, I expect the search to continue on whether on the same hill or a different one. Regardless, we must honestly ask ourselves, what it is we want to find.

Get my new booklet for FREE: A Primer on Søren Kierkegaard, HERE

You can view my UNenlightenment podcast YouTube channel HERE
You can follow me on Facebook HERE

Transform your life today by getting my book UNenlightenment HERE

Get my latest book The Kingdom of Man HERE

General Christian

Religion News

History and Religion

News

Noah's Ark

About Eric English

Eric is a rogue philosopher, theologian, author, podcaster and ninja. He is a father of three, husband of one, and a poet unto himself. Eric’s main areas of thinking are in philosophy (specifically, Soren Kierkegaard), theology (Narrative Perspectivism), and culture. Eric also hosts the podcast UNenlightenment. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

September 8, 2026

God's Silence and the Anger We're Afraid to Feel

True or False: John's Gospel does not record any parables.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Books by This Author Books by UNenlightenment

See All Titles »