BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Evangelical
- On Divine Goodness: If God Alone Is Good, How Can Jesus and We Be Good?
On Divine Goodness: If God Alone Is Good, How Can Jesus and We Be Good?
Last updated on: September 2, 2017 at 12:22 pm by Paul Louis Metzger
On Divine Goodness: If God Alone Is Good, How Can Jesus and We Be Good? 2017-09-02T12:22:23-07:00 Paul Louis Metzger
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Chinese depiction of Jesus and the rich young man, Beijing, 1879. Wikipedia.
I have always been fascinated with the story of the rich young ruler (recorded in Mark 10, Matthew 19 and Luke 18) as it bears on divine goodness, Jesus, and us. Among other things, I have been struck by Jesus’ response at the beginning and close of his interaction with the man. Here are the opening and closing statements in context: “And as he was setting out on his journey, a man ran up and knelt before him and asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone’” (Mark 10:17-18; ESV). After Jesus notes the importance of following the commandments and the man replies that he has obeyed them from his youth (Mark 10:19-20), the story continues: “And Jesus, looking at him, loved him, and said to him, ‘You lack one thing: go, sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me’” (Mark 10:21; ESV). The account ends with the man walking away disheartened because he had great wealth (Mark 10:22).
Jesus’ instruction is startling. Jesus goes beyond the explicit commands of Scripture and tells the man he still lacks something. He needs to go sell all his possessions, give the proceeds to the poor to obtain treasures in heaven, and then follow him. Only God can rightfully make such demands. I believe that is why Jesus asks the question of the man, “Why do you call me good?”
Only God is good. Either Jesus is telling the man not to call him good because God alone is good, or Jesus is claiming that just as God alone is good, he is truly good and therefore God, thereby inviting the man to look to him as Lord.[1] Now if Jesus is truly good, then he is God. And then, the person had better expect a divine demand on his life. It is not something he can take or leave as mere opinion. Nor will Jesus permit the man to treat him as a good moral teacher who simply gives important ethical instructions.[2] C. S. Lewis puts the latter point this way in Mere Christianity:
I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: “I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.” That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.[3]
Now, if Jesus is God, as Lewis maintains in view of Jesus’ claims recorded in Scripture, then what does that mean for how we view goodness and God? For starters, it does not mean that we have to separate the God of the Old Testament from the New, limiting the gospel of gracious goodness to the New, as if we were following in Marcion’s footsteps. After all, Jesus claims that he comes not to abolish the Law and the Prophets, but to fulfill them (Matthew 5:17). Or, as John’s Gospel puts it, Jesus is the glory of God in the flesh and the fullness of grace and truth (John 1:14).[4] Grace in fullness in Jesus replaces the grace that foreshadows it in Moses (John 1:16-17).[5] Remember that God discloses to Moses that his glory is his goodness, highlighting first and foremost his mercy and grace, steadfast love and faithfulness, without discounting in any way his holy judgment on sin (See Exodus 33:18-20; 34:6-7).
While accounting for Jesus’ deity in our understanding of divine goodness and conception of God does not involve separating the Old and New Testaments, or discounting the former, it does entail that we highlight Jesus’ significance for disclosing the fullness of God’s glorious goodness in all its facets. After all, according to John 1:18, he alone has been in the presence of God, seeing God face to face, and revealing God to us. He is the supreme exegesis of the Godhead. Although Jesus does not exhaust the Godhead (Christo-monism), he is not one-third God (Partialism), a second of three Gods (Tritheism), a second mode of God (Modalism), or a lesser God (Subordinationism) either. He is fully God with the Father in the Spirit who is also God.
I will save further consideration of the topic of the Trinity and the Spirit for another time, as I wish to focus consideration on Jesus’ significance for our understanding of divine glory and goodness, as well as our own. Jesus is the fullness of God’s mercy and grace and steadfast love and faithfulness in the flesh. He reveals these qualities beyond all measure as he takes God’s judgment on our sin upon himself in his holy life at the cross. As John the Baptist declared, he is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29; cf. 53:5-6).
What do we learn about God’s glorious goodness by gazing upon Jesus? And how does this discussion bear upon our goodness and salvation? There is no depth to which God won’t go—no suffering or shame he won’t endure—to destroy sin and shame’s hold on us and draw us to himself? We cannot make ourselves good and save ourselves. We cannot pay our way to heaven by riches or religious merit, wisdom or power. We have to surrender all of it and throw ourselves upon God’s mercy and follow Jesus, just like Jesus’ disciples (Mark 10:23-31). Salvation is only possible with God, as Jesus tells his disciples following his exchange with the rich young ruler (Mark 10:27).
In a Moralistic Therapeutic Deistic Age, people often assume that if they are good, God will bless them with happiness and give them eternal life. We would do well to ponder what Timothy Keller asserted in his assessment of the rich young ruler. It applies in an MTD age as well: “Jesus smashed two of the rich young ruler’s assumptions: Christianity is something you can ADD and something you can DO.” As I see it, Christianity is Jesus who summons us to a new way of being in the world as we follow him.
We cannot add Jesus to our lives and attain salvation on our own. Jesus must become our life. Salvation, goodness and the truly good life is only possible with God who makes it actual by doing the unimaginable in Jesus. Jesus died in our place, hanging between two thieves and being buried in a rich man’s grave, though he had done no wrong: “And they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth” (Isaiah 53:9; ESV). Jesus’ merciful and gracious goodness is radical, self-sacrificial and severe, as God grants spiritual criminals and paupers the riches of his eternal goodness and life. Salvation is only possible through him.
_______________
[1]Here I differ with William T. Lane who writes that “Jesus’ intention is not to pose the question of his own sinlessness or oneness with the Father, but to set in correct perspective the honor of God.” William L. Lane, The Gospel According to Mark, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, 2nd revised edition (Grand Rapids; Eerdmans, 1974), page 366. In my estimation, it is not an either/or. I believe Jesus poses both his own deity in an indirect, inviting manner, and sets in correct perspective the honor of God. For various commentaries engaging this text, refer here.
[2]Immanuel Kant provides us with an interesting example of one who proves ambiguous on Jesus’ identity as a moral archetype. Wayne P. Pomerleau’s article at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philisophy on Kant’s philosophy of religion provides the following statement: “In the second book [in Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone], Jesus of Nazareth is presented as an archetype symbolizing our ability to resist our propensity to evil and to approach the virtuous ideal of moral perfection. What Kant does not say is whether or not, in addition to being a moral model whose example we should try to follow, Jesus is also of divine origin in some unique manner attested to by miracles. Just as he neither denies nor affirms the divinity of Christ, so Kant avoids committing himself regarding belief in miracles, which can lead us into superstition (Religion, pp. 51, 54, 57, 74, 77, and 79-82; for more on the mystery of the Incarnation, see Theology, pp. 264-265).”
[3]C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: HarperCollins, 1952), page 52.
[4]A. T. Hanson believes the expression “full of grace and truth” refers to the revelation of God in Exodus 33–34. See Hanson, Grace and Truth: A Study in the Doctrine of the Incarnation (London: SPCK, 1975), page 5.
[5]The NIV translates the Greek word anti in charin anti charitos in John 1:16 as conveying “one blessing after another.” A footnote in the ESV indicates that it can be read “grace in place of grace.” The comparison and contrast involve Jesus and Moses (John 1:17). D.A. Carson translates the entire phrase of charin anti charitos in verse 16 to be “grace instead of grace” in keeping with one of the most frequent renderings of the preposition anti as “instead of.” Certainly, the Law of Moses is gracious. However, it is replaced by the surpassing grace revealed in Jesus Christ. See Carson’s analysis of this phrase in Gospel According to John, pages 131-34. A form of the word plerōma is used here in verse 16, conveying that Jesus’ grace exceeds limits. F. F. Bruce unpacks the significance of the word in this context: “This plenitude of divine glory and goodness which resides in Christ (cf. Col 1:19; 2:9) is an ocean from which all his people may draw without ever diminishing its content.” F. F. Bruce, The Gospel of John: Introduction, Exposition and Notes (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983), page 43.
Previous Post

August 30, 2017
How Would You and Job Rate God’s Customer Service in Addressing Evil?
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Uncategorized
Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Why was crossing the Jordan River particularly difficult for the Israelites at that time?
Select your answer to see how you score.
There were no bridges It was at flood stage The river was frozen The river was filled with crocodiles
Books by This Author Books by Paul Louis Metzger
Related posts from Uncommon God, Common Good
Heavenly Father’s Day on Trinity Sunday
Easter Triduum: Obey Your Thirst—for God
Holy Week Is Humble Week: "Beware of Becoming...
Excavating the Person in a Throwaway Culture
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...
This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....
How the author of the world's best hymn...
I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...
Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...
What About the Trees? Another Living Parable
After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...
Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...
Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...
Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...
view all Evangelical blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In












