Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

uncommongodcommongood

When Jesus Returns, Will He Find Faith or Technology?

Last updated on: January 10, 2017 at 7:55 pm   by Paul Louis Metzger

When Jesus Returns, Will He Find Faith or Technology? 2017-01-10T19:55:02-08:00 Paul Louis Metzger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Faith in Technology

Creative Commons

When Jesus returns to earth, will he find faith? Perhaps not, but he may find technology. I thought about this topic while listening to an interview where Martin Scorsese discusses his new movie Silence, his own personal story, and faith. Refer here for the interview.

The film is based on Shusaku Endo’s book by the same title (I recently wrote about the movie in a post titled “Apostasy: Would You Ever Renounce Your Faith? Reflections on the Movie ‘Silence’”). The movie chronicles two Jesuit missionaries who journey from Portugal to Japan in the seventeenth century, when Christianity was prohibited. They went secretly in the attempt to find their mentor who had supposedly renounced the Christian faith and to strengthen the suffering church. The movie deals with the weakness of the human spirit, but also its strength, in the struggle of faith. We who are believers must come to terms with both: we need to be honest and empathic with others in their failures in faith in that we are all weak; we also have the potential to be resilient in the face of great travail, as in the case of the Japanese Christians who paid the ultimate price for their faith. All of us are bound up in this two-fold struggle.

The interviewer asked Scorsese if people in America appreciate and understand the kind of faith expressed by the Japanese Christians, which involved the willingness to undergo such excruciating suffering. Scorsese responded:

Do we have that kind of faith here in America? Does our culture reflect that? I don’t know if it does…Faith here now is our technology, I think. But when they pull the plug from the technology, there’s still gotta be something…There’s gonna be that confrontation or that realization of yourself really…

Such faith, as Scorsese says earlier in the interview, involves encountering Jesus when everything else is removed. He’s the one we ultimately face, not church institutions, however important, or technology (Refer to the segment in the clip that runs from 12:30 to 15:03).

Our certitude in view of our technological sophistication, advancement and alternative-reductionist scientific explanations stand in the way. Scorsese expects many to be hostile, and others to be at least critical (perhaps cynical?) of external aspects of the mission on display in the movie. He claims that so many films have dealt with such external dimensions, including no doubt associations with colonialism. Scorsese went in a different direction with this movie: he decided to go at the subject of religion and mission from the inside out, not from the outside looking in. In other words, he chose not to focus on the external struggles of religion’s interface with political and institutional forces, but rather, the internal struggles of faith (Refer to 18:00-20:50 of the video clip).

I’m not sure one can understand the film without some appreciation for faith—what goes on inside. How often do we play the role of the Inquisitor and his subordinates in the movie who simply focused on external forces associated with faith?

The Japanese interrogators did not appear to hate the Christians as individuals, but rather hated what their teaching and its import meant for Japan. Is there not a sense that they were looking simply from the outside in, just as the Western powers did, and just as many people do today? Having come through an extremely lengthy and costly civil war, Japan had only just recently experienced united rule. In no way were they going to allow an external force such as Christianity that was to them exported from the West to jeopardize their culture. They simply wished to cultivate and preserve Japan, which is exactly what they did over the next few hundred years; there was hardly any contact with the outside world during the Eido era.

I wonder to what extent the Inquisitor and his associates’ adherence to Buddhism, as alluded to in the film, was a matter of the heart or external forces that involved bringing about greater social cohesiveness. The same could be said of the Western political powers of the day. It is probably fair to say that many of the Japanese political and military leaders were drawn to Western technology, not Christianity, when sojourners from the West first landed on Japanese soil. Even when America under the auspices of Commodore Matthew Perry forced Japan to open its ports to America in the nineteenth century, it was not the call for freedom of religion that captivated the Japanese imagination, but Western military technology: the Japanese wanted to achieve equivalent military might so as to protect themselves from Western empires’ quest for expansion (Refer here to a discussion that includes consideration of this theme).

Authentic faith is never very efficient; as a result, it often runs aground when coming onshore in the East and in the West. Efficiency was and is increasingly the name of the game for those who approach faith from the outside, whether Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, or American. But inefficient faith is needed more than ever before, for technology, like Scorsese reflects, does not prepare us for the most vital encounter in the depths of our being after the plug of technology is pulled. While technology makes life convenient and efficient, Jesus is inconvenient and messes with our sense of autonomy and modern superiority.

Scorsese’s concern for Americans expressed in his interview reminded me of Jacques Ellul’s assessment of modernity: the new orthodoxy frames the good life as the most efficient. The technological mechanization of all of life construes value by way of efficiency in the form of technique (See Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society, with an introduction by Robert K. Merton {Toronto: Vintage Books, 1964}, pages 12, 21.) Only “the consoling hum of a unified society” appears to relieve us of anxiety as the age of machine extends its reach (See page 6).

Scorsese and Ellul are no Luddites. They have nothing against machines and technology. What they challenge is the certitude of human faith in machines and its eclipsing of human meaning and value. I believe they would much rather champion human frailty involving faith, whether Christian, Buddhist, or another, than the Promethean quest for omni-competence. An awareness by faith of our inefficiency prepares us far better for the divine encounter to which Scorsese alludes in his interview. It also helps us come to terms with the realization of who we truly are as frail humans. But are we willing to be so honest? The stakes are high on the high seas between the East and West and inside you and me.

If Jesus were to return to earth, would he find faith? Yes—in technology. But perhaps we humans with all our weaknesses and agonizing struggles to be authentic before God and one another in the face of mechanistic efficiency will be no more.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



January 8, 2017

Jesus' Epiphany Is Like a Rich Oriental Tapestry—Marvel at His Pattern

Next Post



January 13, 2017 Pre-Inauguration: We Need to Move On—But How?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was struck dead instantly for lying about money they gave to the church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judas Iscariot and Mary Magdalene Aquila and Priscilla Ananias and Sapphira Simon the Sorcerer and Demas

Books by This Author Books by Paul Louis Metzger

See All Titles »

Related posts from Uncommon God, Common Good

Evangelical

Heavenly Father’s Day on Trinity Sunday

Uncommon God, Common Good

Evangelical

Easter Triduum: Obey Your Thirst—for God

Uncommon God, Common Good

Evangelical

Holy Week Is Humble Week: "Beware of Becoming...

Uncommon God, Common Good

Evangelical

Excavating the Person in a Throwaway Culture

Uncommon God, Common Good

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube