“How Might Worship in a Movie Theater in the Middle of Town Be Beneficial to the Future of the Church?”

Last updated on: January 4, 2017 at 10:49 am by Paul Louis Metzger

“How Might Worship in a Movie Theater in the Middle of Town Be Beneficial to the Future of the Church?” 2017-01-04T10:49:42-08:00 Paul Louis Metzger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo Credit: Kenneth Lu

I have been asked to contribute to the “Nontraditional Church: Trends for the Future” symposium at Patheos. One of the jumping-in points that Patheos offered for consideration is: “How might worship in a movie theater in the middle of town be beneficial to the future of the church?”

A worship service in the middle of town, more specifically, an urban center, might be beneficial to the future of the church if the people are truly connected to the urban community. This could be an improvement on what appeared to many to be the white church retreat to the suburbs and exurbs in past decades to escape cities, which were viewed as dens of wickedness (and quite possibly to escape people not like them). Back in 2005, Jeff Sharlet wrote in Harper’s Magazine: “the exurban position is one of strategic retreat, where believers are to ‘plant’ their churches as strategic outposts encircling the enemy.”[1] However, given the disturbing reality of gentrification for many minority communities in cities like Portland, Oregon, where I work (See W. Kamau Bell’s CNN piece on Portland and gentrification, especially his interview with Pastor Donald Frazier and members of his church, at the following link: https://youtu.be/p8hqfe5qUBI {12:25-17:40}), worship in the middle of town for a white hipster congregation may foster the gentrifying forces that are pushing minority communities out (See my blog post titled “The Gentrified Church—Paved with Good Intentions?”) So, one should ask about the demographics of the church itself, and about the church’s larger aims for use of that space in the middle of the town or city.

Another item to consider is the venue of a movie theater itself. Movie theaters are entertainment centers. Do churches wish to entertain people? Gretchen Buggeln’s point on designing churches like shopping malls or strip malls bears consideration here as well: “Can a church built in the idiom of a secular consumer society effectively counter that culture’s influences?”[2] While pursuing entertainment can certainly be a very good endeavor, and films provide us incredible inroads to understanding and engaging our culture well, as Robert K. Johnston’s important work shows,[3] should a church use a medium often associated with entertainment to frame its ambiance and sense of sacred space? If a church community makes use of such space, it needs to reflect carefully on how it might counter conscious or sub-conscious associations people would make that churches and Christianity exist to entertain and amuse them, especially in ways that lead them to escape life through amusement rather than face its many challenges. It is important that churches using movie theater spaces draw viewers into the divine comedy and tragedy, using laughter as well as tears in cathartic ways to capture their imaginations and involve them in Jesus’ story of redemption.

Furthermore, productions in theaters tend to separate those up front from those in the seats, as performers from spectators. Do churches wish to convey such separation? Of course, one could look to Interactive theatre for ideas on how to break through the divide, as this form of theater involves audience participation in various ways. The aim here is to break through the “fourth wall” that separates performers from their audiences in verbal and physical ways. Certainly, there is a long history of viewing the entire creation as the theater of redemption, and that God is acting out the divine drama in which all humanity participates. The key here is to be intentional in making it possible for everyone gathered to participate. What kind of dramatic presentation is your church enacting?

Auditorium churches have a long history, going back to the nineteenth century, as Buggeln’s article connotes. So, in one sense, auditorium or theater-like churches are not new. Still, there was a revolt against them for greater formality and ritual followed by yet another revolt or alternative trend that sought to foster greater intimacy and a sense of gathering and participation. Then came the move toward shopping mall-looking churches. Take for example Buggeln’s reference to a 1996 Los Angeles Times article, which includes a quotation from a megachurch pastor in California: “‘What we were aiming for was the feeling of a mall. A place that’s familiar, a real gregarious place.’” Buggeln adds, “Hence the snack bars, polished stone lobbies, large clear windows and central information kiosks found in many of these complexes.”[4]

As I reflect longer on the opening question, I wonder if the wording “beneficial to” is appropriate: “beneficial to” in what way(s)? “Beneficial” might come across as consumeristic—catering to impulses of people and churches to get what they want, when they want it, and at the least cost to themselves. Perhaps “sound (or wise) for,” or even “appropriate for,” would be better wording to use here: “How might worship in a movie theater in the middle of town be sound or appropriate for the future of the church?”

Here it behooves us to think of our ancient faith, as we consider the future. Here I call to mind the late Robert Webber’s Ancient-Future Faith.[5] As Webber argues, Evangelicalism would benefit greatly by revisiting ancient Christian thought forms to free itself from modernist trappings. The ancient church approached a pagan and pluralistic culture not unlike our own contemporary society in a counter-cultural manner, according to Webber; the only way to engage post-modern culture well is not to water down the faith (as if it were entertainment), but to frame the church as a counter-cultural community shaped by the history of Israel and Jesus.

Would such consideration of our communal story shaped by the history of Israel and Jesus lead us to construct sacred spaces that have people facing one another where the platform and stage imagery gives way to a table at the center, or where the outline of the structure looks more like a cross? Of course, Christians have constructed churches along such lines in the past. But how intentional are we today in our use of space? How often do pragmatic and utilitarian factors related to “benefit” shape our thinking rather than biblical theology and questions pertaining to what our use of ‘sacred space’ conveys?

Space matters, as I argued in a Leadership Journal article several years ago. I close with the question that the article “Walls do Talk” asks: “In the Bible, locations and structures mean something. What is your facility saying?”[6]

This post is part of a Patheos symposium on “Nontraditional Church: Trends for the Future” sponsored by Regal Theatre Church.

_______________

[1]Jeff Sharlet, “Inside America’s Most Powerful Megachurch,” Harper’s Magazine, vol. 310, no. 1860 (May 2005): 50.

[2]Gretchen T. Buggeln, “Sacred Spaces: Designing America’s Churches,” Christian Century, June 15, 2004, p. 25.

[3]Robert K. Johnston, Reel Spirituality: Theology and Film in Dialogue, Engaging Culture series, 2nd edition (Baker Academic, 2006).

[4]Buggeln, page 23.

[5]Robert E. Webber, Ancient-Future Faith: Rethinking Evangelicalism for a Postmodern World (Baker Books, 1999).

[6]Paul Louis Metzger, “Walls do Talk: In the Bible, locations and structures mean something. What is your facility saying?” Leadership Journal (Fall 2009): 20-23.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 19, 2016

Dads: Do We Father Our Kids Where They Are, Or Where We Want Them To Be?

Next Post

July 4, 2016 Self-Government--Is It a Myth?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz