Can We Transfer Consciousness to Synthetic Bodies without the Move Proving Catastrophic?

Last updated on: January 4, 2017 at 10:49 am by Paul Louis Metzger

Can We Transfer Consciousness to Synthetic Bodies without the Move Proving Catastrophic? 2017-01-04T10:49:47-08:00 Paul Louis Metzger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo Credit: Carolyn Speranza

Can we transfer consciousness to synthetic bodies without the move proving problematic, even catastrophic? The move would be made easier if we are ghosts in fleshly machines who are not vitally connected to our bodies, and who can fly about freely in cyberspace. But are we ghosts in fleshly machines?

For those like myself who think we are embodied beings rather than ghosts in fleshly machines, we may fear the loss of our point of reference as humans, if we transfer consciousness to synthetic bodies, machine boxes, or even bats. More on bats later.

With these questions in mind, it is worth quoting from an article at Natural Society titled “2045 ‘Immortality’ Transhumanism Program Threatens Humanity’s Integrity”:

Being advocates of natural health and believing the human body has its own intricate design, an attempt to become a synthetic avatar would potentially erase all of the aspects of humanity that define our character and being.

This technology at its fruition would also attempt to delve into realms of reality no scientist has ever been able to grasp within a natural, human viewpoint of comprehension. Theoretical physicists are beginning to admit that our universe is a shadow of a larger reality, and the natural man can scarcely understand it with his own devices. Like it or not, this universe is far more complex than what we have observed.

The human body is a very complex reality, involving material phenomena as well as consciousness, which individuals like Thomas Nagel maintain cannot be reduced to matter, and yet is not separate from matter (See Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False {Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012}). John Searle is also wary of materialism as the opposite of Cartesian Dualism. Searle is a naturalist, who does not want to reduce mental processes to a materialist conception of reality. A (critical) review of Searle’s position summarizes it as follows: “Although Searle rejects property dualism, he makes it clear that he does not agree with this common materialist assumption. He believes that it is perfectly consistent with naturalism to hold that the world is entirely composed of physical particles obeying the laws of physics while still maintaining that there are irreducible features of the mind that fit perfectly well into a naturalistic physical ontology.”

It would likely be extremely difficult if not impossible to transfer consciousness to another entity, such as machine boxes or bats. If, as Nagel maintains, humans could never think objectively as bats, could bats or machines ever think objectively as humans, which would entail human subjectivity?

More on Nagel’s thought experiment. Nagel claims that humans could not think objectively as bats (bats as mammals are taken to experience consciousness), even if somehow we could be transformed into these bug-eating, upside-down hanging, superbly sonar-skilled flying creatures. We may be able to experience aspects of bat lives, but not consciousness. After all, would not our own subjective states as humans interfere? Would it not be necessary for our brains to be wired as those of bats from the time of birth to think just as bats would? See Nagel’s essay, “What Is It Like to Be a Bats?”

The reverse question also arises: if we transformed or metamorphosed into bats, could we think and operate any longer as humans? Maybe we would not be bat men, but bat monsters, as we fly about in space. The same kind of question arises as it pertains to mechanical boxes. If our intelligence and perhaps consciousness could be transferred to machines, could we ever think as humans? Or would we lose contact?

This question arises, as one considers the movie Transcendence starring Johnny Depp, Rebecca Hall, Morgan Freeman, and Kate Mara. In the film, the move is made to transfer the intelligence and consciousness of the world’s leading expert (played by Depp) in AI to a machine, as the scientist dies. ‘His’ mind is free and he is able to go everywhere; he or it experiences ‘transcendence’. There are no limits, as he is beyond space through cyberspace. He is everywhere and nowhere at the same time, as his wife says he is no longer with her in his cyber explorations to improve the race in terrifyingly impending and dramatic proportions. The results of such transcendence or disembodiment may prove catastrophic. As one commentator on this theme says in a Newsweek review of the film, “While anecdotally measurable, linking consciousness directly to brain activity remains elusive. So we can’t be sure that a fully mapped brain inside a computer would choose to launch nuclear missiles directly at the moon to see what happens, or just take its virtual pants off in public.” The only thing that connects Depp’s character remotely to humanity is his ‘sense’ of love for his wife (a fellow expert in AI). She and her colleagues are the only ones who can potentially ground him. But without some connection to human embodiment, where would ‘mind’ go and what would it do?

These are not simply the concerns that Luddite terrorist groups might pose (like the one in the movie), as they seek to pull the plug on the transfer of consciousness. In the film, Depp’s fellow AI scientists address these concerns, as they ponder whether or not to try and shut him or it down given what appears to be an imminent apocalypse.

The moral of the story may be that before such transference can or should be made, we need to come to terms with a solid grasp of consciousness and its connection to our bodily birth states. Moreover, the more we move to explore artificial intelligence, the more we need to explore human relationships. They may be the only things that keeps ‘minds’ in machines from abstract speculation that no longer accounts for those around them—not so unlike people lost in cyberspace on their cell phones as they pass by one another on sidewalks, or crash into one another on highways today.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 8, 2016

Pushing the Outer Limits of Humanity and Its Bearing on Space Travel: The Trans-human Quest

Next Post

February 17, 2016 Is Christ Divided? A Reflection on David Gushee's Call for a Great Evangelical Divorce

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz