Ideological Totalitarians—Kiss and Make Up

Last updated on: February 18, 2014 at 5:52 pm by Paul Louis Metzger

Ideological Totalitarians—Kiss and Make Up 2014-02-18T17:52:58-08:00 Paul Louis Metzger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Fundamentalism comes in all shapes and sizes. Not only have I met conservative Christians and Muslims who are fundamentalists, but also I have met liberal fundamentalists. A fundamentalist spirit is present in those who will not seek to collaborate with people on the other side of an issue. The fundamentalist mentality is reflected in “Take no prisoners—or else.”

Here I call to mind USA TODAY religion columnist Tom Krattenmaker’s book, The Evangelicals You Don’t Know: Introducing the Next Generation of Christians. In my endorsement for the book, I wrote:

…Krattenmaker complexifies the situation in which we find ourselves in America today. Drawing attention to a groundswell of compassion and civic virtue within evangelical Christianity that does not fit the negative stereotypes of much of secular America, Krattenmaker powerfully argues that the battle is not between evangelicals and non-evangelicals, including secularists. As he sees it, the culture war dividing line is between religious and secular totalitarians on the one hand and those from across the religious and cultural spectrum that are coming together in support of the common good…

Tom claims that we should no longer allow the totalitarians of these diverse stripes to control the microphone. Am I too naïve in thinking that perhaps the day would come when there would be no more totalitarians and we could have a splendid karaoke session where everyone shares the mic? That does not mean there would no longer be strong and passionate differences and convictions. But there would be civility across the board toward those across the aisle. Unfortunately, we are a long way away from that change in our public profile as a society.

Religious and secular, conservative and liberal totalitarians make for unlikely and unbecoming bedfellows in American society. They are too busy fighting with one another based on pre-shrunk perspectives and ideologies to ever make up. As a result, not only do they suffer; we all suffer as a result. What has led us to this place?

It is important that we understand history so that we don’t repeat it, as the philosopher George Santayana remarked. Certainly the Scopes-Monkey trial in 1925 on creation and evolution had something to do with it. As George Marsden highlights, “It would be difficult to overestimate the impact” of this particular trial “in transforming fundamentalism” (George Marsden, Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism — 1870-1925 {Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980}, p. 184). I maintain that the trial and its fallout did not simply help to transform Christian fundamentalism but also liberalism, too. The pivotal loss of the public square to the evolutionists and liberal theology as well as secularism at the time led to back and forth motions, posturing and traumatic battles throughout the following decades up unto the present. Efforts in those circles have always been aimed at retaking the hill, including Capitol Hill. The marketing gurus for the respective camps have labeled their membership bases as moral majorities of various persuasions. The present-day partisan politicians in Washington play this same game, use such rhetorical flurries, and bear witness to the faulty lines of division of the warring tribes.

How do we move beyond tribalism in the contemporary context? It is one thing to have strong convictions. It is quite another to be so ideologically framed that one cannot make attempts to collaborate where everyone wins whenever possible. A winner take all mentality not only defeats the other side; it also defeats the common good.

Self-righteousness is something we all struggle with. I am no exception. With this point in mind, it is important to note that people claiming to take middle ground positions can be just as rigid and proud as those on the right or left. One such as I who wishes to espouse centrist positions must not fixate on cementing everything in the middle ground and claiming squatters’ rights. We, too, need to move beyond posturing. We, too, need to listen and make room for others from across the idealogical spectrum to argue their cases. That being said, crusading moralists on the right and left often reject calls for cultivating an expansive moral vision.

Evangelicals’ longstanding (and rightful) concern over abortion does not usually account for a centrist and expansive moral vision. A centrist and expansive moral vision would require us to concern ourselves with other pressing matters involving such topics as universal health care, environmental stewardship and pollution, and the rights of minorities and the poor. All too often, we fail to see the connection between these various issues; we are in no position to point fingers, especially when we Evangelicals don’t help fight against injustices that make it extremely difficult for mothers to bring babies to term. From the opposite end of the spectrum, those on the left often fail to account for the moral dilemma that abortion poses. No matter how it is framed, abortion is an evil—whether or not one can or does argue that abortion is a necessary or the least-of-all possible evils. The same types of struggle could be reversed in terms of capital punishment and war: for example, in the case of war, no matter how just or apparently necessary the evil of killing someone to guard against greater harm is, killing someone is still an evil. Liberals often appear to get this point much better than conservatives.

I remember a group discussion involving conservative Evangelicals and Zen Buddhists over various pressing ethical concerns, including those mentioned here. What stood out to us is that given our history of building community relations with one another, we Buddhists and Evangelicals trusted one another enough to know that we were not going to try and take the other tribe’s camp by storm. Thus, we could be honest about our struggles and concerns. The Buddhists were open and honest about their struggles with abortion, revealing their consternation over how many liberals fail to see the moral difficulties that abortion poses. It made it possible for us Evangelicals to be more open about the moral complexities of our own positions and to guard against posturing. Such honesty and humility from our respective groups helped us all work through our strong differences and disagreements to humanize one another’s positions. Such humanization has also helped us work to complexify arguments for the sake of building a more centrist and comprehensive moral vision for the good of all.

Next time you hear someone in your circle saying we need to take back America from the other side, consider that if we keep on with our partisan infighting there might not be any side left to fight— including our own. So, before it’s too late, encourage those unlikely bedfellows—the ideological totalitarians of various extremes—to kiss and make up. After all, making up can be so much better than even the best of fights.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 17, 2014

Moving Beyond Extremes to Gospel-Centered Love

Next Post

February 19, 2014 Life Together in the Land of Lewis and Clark: Reflections on Donald Miller and the Northwest Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz