Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Transcendentalish

Home
Evangelical
The Tragedy of American Machiaevangelicals

The Tragedy of American Machiaevangelicals

Last updated on: January 16, 2025 at 4:31 pm by Guest Contributor

The Tragedy of American Machiaevangelicals 2025-01-16T16:31:53+00:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Adjacent to signs for a smattering of Democratic senators with presidential ambitions, a neighbor of mine has this sign planted in their front yard: “Vote Blue No Matter Who!” Perhaps this would be saying something in some quarters but I live in a city that is overwhelmingly blue. Since 1964, Washington, DC has had a mere three electoral votes and never once has a Republican candidate received one.

Apart from signaling their political leanings to loads of neighbors who, by and large, share them, I’ve found myself wondering about the purpose of the sign. What’s the point? Given my neighborhood, I don’t think the sign will change many peoples voting behaviors. I do, however, think it is a reflection of the larger trends in American voting behavior over the past few decades.

After the most recent mid-term elections, FiveThirtyEight posted an article called “Everything is Partisan and Correlated and Boring.” In it, Nathaniel Rakich explains how voting behavior has changed in the past fifty years. During, let’s say, the election of 1972 when Nixon defeated McGovern, Americans were much more likely to vote for person over party. In our polarized political context, partisan loyalty has run amuck. According to a Pew Research poll, Americans are more polarized now than at any point in the past 20 years and the more politically engaged a person is, the more they are likely to vote along ideological lines.

The sign in my neighbor’s yard is as “partisan and correlated and boring” as a Republican sign with its own political jingle (probably lamer because what rhymes with “red”? – maybe “vote right or you’ll be wrong”) staked in a yard in Wyoming. Wyoming is red as DC is blue; it has just three electoral votes that also happened to have the highest percentage of votes for Trump in the general election.

All of this is a really long way to say that it almost doesn’t matter which candidate the parties nominate. Everything is partisan and correlated and boring. These days, Americans care far less about the particular person and his or her idiosyncrasies and character far more about the party they represent. If the road to 2020 is paved the way of 2016, the cardinal virtue for the next leader of the free world will not be moral courage, integrity, respectability or any other reasonable thing – it will be electability.

That the American electorate’s bar is so low is troublesome in and of itself but it is especially unacceptable for Christians. Christians ought to care far more about the integrity of their faith than the victory of a political party and the potential powers, privileges, and protections therein.

Given the well-documented and historic misdeeds, the inappropriate, unpresidential, offensive, mean, gross – not to mention sexually degrading, humiliating, false, and racist – things President Trump says on a regular basis, it makes no sense for American Christians, in general, and white evangelical Protestants, in particular, to endorse Donald Trump in the way they do.

Peter Wehner nails it when he writes this in a recent piece in the Atlantic called “The Deepening Crisis in Evangelical Christianity”:

The enthusiastic, uncritical embrace of President Trump by white evangelicals is among the most mind-blowing developments of the Trump era. How can a group that for decades—and especially during the Bill Clinton presidency—insisted that character counts and that personal integrity is an essential component of presidential leadership not only turn a blind eye to the ethical and moral transgressions of Donald Trump, but also constantly defend him?

How, indeed.

And when I (or Mr. Wehner) refer to white evangelicals, we’re not referring just to the particularly egregious instances of wholesale support by the likes of evangelical leaders like Jerry Falwell, Jr. who self-consciously jettisons “incidentals” like Christian character from the qualifications for President because they’re weighing the train down from getting political power (see this tweet). A recent Pew Research poll from March 2019 suggests that nearly 7 out of 10 white evangelical Protestants approve of Trump’s handling of the presidency. And, to be clear, this statistic doesn’t just refer to folks who “identify” as evangelicals but don’t actually go to church. According to the Pew report: “White evangelical Protestants who regularly attend church (that is, once a week or more) approve of Trump at rates matching or exceeding those of white evangelicals who attend church less often.”

American Evangelicals hitching their wagons to Trump was shocking in 2016 and the voltage is only increasing. It feels like some sort of terrible Stanley Milgram experiment.

I think David Remnick, the Editor of The New Yorker is right to call out all of the folks who voted for President Trump. As a Christian, I think his critique is especially appropriate for evangelicals. In direct response to President Trump’s directive to four congresswomen – all women of color, three of whom were born in America – that they should all “go back” to the countries “from which they came.” Remnick writes:

Republicans and Independents, evangelicals, and many others who might have voted for Trump in 2016 will eventually have to ask themselves whether it is possible to go on believing that he is a man of sufficient character to hold the Presidency.

Whether it was motivated by religious freedom, issues related to the sexual revolution, the chance to secure a few conservative Supreme Court justices or some other ultimate goal, white evangelicals ultimately voted as machiavellians. But I don’t think the ends ever justify the means. Potential political gains over the span of four or eight years, however important they are cannot be worth compromising the integrity of the Christian faith.

As an orthodox, Bible-believing American Christian, I understand the temptation. In some ways, it’s not hard to understand why white evangelical Protestants voted for Trump. I think much of it was motivated by fear. Whether the fear is legitimate or not is besides the point here. Again, I think Peter Wehner is correct: many white evangelicals voted for Trump and, unless something changes will do so again, because there are “deeply fearful of what a Trump loss would mean for America, American culture, and American Christianity.”

Current Events

American Evangelicals

Previous Post

November 28, 2018

Advent Book Recommendation: Malcolm Guite's Waiting on the Word

Next Post

October 29, 2019 On Bon Iver, Charles Taylor, and Locating Ourselves in the World, OR An Exercise In Intertextuality

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Current Events Film Music Poetry Review Science and Religion THE ANTLIZT Theology Uncategorized Video

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 January 2021 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 November 2019 October 2019 July 2019 November 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 August 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 April 2016 September 2015 August 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Jesus' first miracle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Feeding the 5,000 Turning water into wine Healing a blind man Walking on water