Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Theoblogy

Home
Progressive Christian
Rob Bell Is (Not) a Universalist: The Thief on the Cross

Rob Bell Is (Not) a Universalist: The Thief on the Cross

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 4:58 pm by Tony Jones

Rob Bell Is (Not) a Universalist: The Thief on the Cross 2015-03-13T16:58:16-05:00 Tony Jones

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

All this week, I’ll be posting about Rob Bell’s controversial new book, Love Wins. And this Sunday, April 10, I’ll be guest hosting Doug Pagitt Radio from 12-2pm CDT, talking with Keith DeRose, Michael Horton, and a special surprise guest! The entire two hours will be devoted to a discussion of the book, in advance of Rob’s appearance the following night at Wayzata Community Church.

I was sitting in a college course entitled, “The Theology of Augustine,” when the estimable and eccentric professor, Charles Stinson, asked us what episode in the Bible most clearly accentuates the doctrine of grace. As the rest of the class looked at the tops of their shoes, I timidly raised my hand and answered, “The thief on the cross?”

“Yes, Mr. Jones, that is correct,” he responded, “That is the archetypal example of a person who has done nothing to earn eternal favor yet is promised a dwelling in Paradise.”

In Love Wins (pp. 54-55), also wisely turns to this episode to make his point that God’s pursuit of us is inexorable, and that we have a choice.How important the thief on the cross (aka, St. Dismas) is depends on whether you think he is:

Just lucky that he happened to be crucified next to the Savior of the world;
A good person who was unjustly crucified (and Jesus mysteriously knew this;
Or the archetype of salvation.

If he’s the lattermost, then his acceptance into paradise by Jesus proves, once and for all, that Paul (and Luther) is right and James is basically wrong: we are afforded eternal bliss based on nothing we do (except, maybe, a verbal statement of faith). It’s by grace alone that we’re saved.

Of course, this seems to play right into John Piper’s (and Augustine’s and Calvin’s) hands, and it seems to deal a blow to all the Arminians out there. Dismas doesn’t substantiate predestination, per se, but his example does weaken the argument that we are perfected over time in preparation for heaven.

However, I don’t think it’s Rob’s treatment of Dismas that led John Piper to bid him farewell. It was Rob’s thoughts about the guy one cross over.

When it comes to the atonement, Rob goes with the multiple metaphor model (on pp. 127ff.). I’ve posted about that many times before, and Scot McKnight has laid it out wonderfully in his book, A Community Called Atonement.

At Shored Fragments, Steve Holmes has a wickedly smart post on this topic, writing,

There are problems. When Bell turns to sacrifice, his account repeats where he was in The Gods Aren’t Angry DVD (you’ve not seen The Gods Aren’t Angry? Go and buy it. Now. Watch it, repeatedly. Not for the theology, which is old-fashioned Religionsgeschichte stuff, long discredited, but because this is an utterly stunning lesson in public speaking. Seriously, if Steve Jobs could communicate like this, we’d have been spared Windows completely. If Obama could communicate like this, we’d never have heard of Sarah Palin). Sacrifice, on this account, is something natural to humanity, a way of appeasing divine forces; Jesus offers the final, perfect, sacrifice, and so brings an end to every human attempt to appease an angry deity. I confess I don’t like attempts to force the endlessly diverse religious traditions of humanity into an interpretative scheme; it smacks too much of a totalising ‘I know what your religion is really about’ approach, which should have died with colonialism. Unfortunately, it seems strangely resilient in most traditions of liberal theology. Evangelicalism has generally been less arrogant, and with due respect to Bell, I would rather we continued in that.

He goes on to write,

Easter is not an example of a general pattern of death-and-rebirth, it is a shocking and decisive intervention into the created order which changes everything.

This is possibly the biggest challenge to Rob’s conception of the atonement, at least from a Barthian perspective. And Rob is not alone here. A lot of people ultimately conceive of the crucifixion and resurrection as the natural extension of what God has already been up to in the history of God’s interaction with Israel. Others see the crucifixion and resurrection as a cosmic irruption, neither presaged nor repeated anywhere in history.

The answer to that dilemma, it seems to me, is a good one for all Christians to ponder.

Previous Post

April 7, 2011

The Dissertation Is in the Mail!

Next Post

April 8, 2011 Questions for Rob Bell

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category bible blogging books christianity in america church church history dissertation divorce Dog Training education emergent church essay family funny glbt jopa productions ministry minnesota movies music parenting philosophy politics Prayer publishing Questions That Haunt random same sex marriage speaking spirituality Teaching technology television theology Travels Uncategorized writing youth ministry

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 June 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004 February 2004 January 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 1 Peter, what will the proven genuineness of faith result in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eternal life Blessings Salvation Praise, glory and honor when Jesus is revealed