George Wood Plans to Be Civil, but Only to Evangelicals

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 5:02 pm by Tony Jones

George Wood Plans to Be Civil, but Only to Evangelicals 2015-03-13T17:02:01-05:00 Tony Jones

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

George O. Wood

Readers of my blog will remember that George O. Wood, General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God pressured the Society for Pentecostal Studies to disinvite me from their March, 2010 meeting in Minneapolis. They didn’t cow.

Well, it seems that Wood recently signed the Covenant for Civility: Come Let Us Reason Together, a statement initiated by Sojourners in the wake of Glen Beck’s ranting about “hammering” Jim Wallis. But now Wood has recanted, and is asking that his name be removed from the statement.

It seems, according to a statement of an Assemblies of God spokesperson, that when Wood signed the statement at a recent meeting of the National Association of Evangelicals, he thought that the phrase, “the unity we have in the body of Christ” referred exclusively to evangelicals. When he found out that “the body of Christ” also includes “people who are supportive of gay marriage and abortion rights,” well, that was just too large of a tent for him.

Jill Carroll of the Houston Chronicle rhetorially asks Wood,

I’m not sure why civility should be such a problem, even with people with whom we vehemently disagree on matters of faith. Even if some who call themselves Christians – or “claim the name of Christ” as the statement says – don’t qualify as “Christian” by our standards, shouldn’t we still be civil with them and when we speak about them?

Are we only to be civil toward those who think exactly like us?

But here’s what I find especially ironic. At SPS, the way that North Central College and the others who opposed my appearance protested my presence (they referred to it as a “silent protest”) was to have a computer terminal at the registration table at which people could sign the Manhattan Declaration. And after my address, the Manhattan Declaration came up as part of the Question and Response, including one audience member delivering a homily-styled-as-a-question about his support for the three elements of the Declaration: opposition to abortion; opposition to same sex marriage; and support of religious liberty.

I responded by saying that I have come to find the signing of declarations and statements to be redonkulous (that’s not a direct quote). While I hope I would have had the courage to sign the Barmen Declaration, I don’t believe there’s been a statement since (not even the Lausanne Covenant, my missional friends! 🙂 that is any more powerful than the gospel itself. Plus, as Wood found, these signatures can at times get us in hot water.

So count me as a participant of the covenant we call the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That’s a good enough statement for me.

christianity in america

glbt

pentecostalism

sojourners

Previous Post

April 14, 2010

In Support of Jennifer Knapp

Next Post

April 15, 2010 Follow #Free4All

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category bible blogging books christianity in america church church history dissertation divorce Dog Training education emergent church essay family funny glbt jopa productions ministry minnesota movies music parenting philosophy politics Prayer publishing Questions That Haunt random same sex marriage speaking spirituality Teaching technology television theology Travels Uncategorized writing youth ministry

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 June 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004 February 2004 January 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Mordecai refused to bow down to Haman.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE