BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Biblical Words and World
- Home
- Evangelical
- Ham Sandwiches and Gay Sex: How Timeless Is the Bible’s Teaching?
Ham Sandwiches and Gay Sex: How Timeless Is the Bible’s Teaching?
Last updated on: June 18, 2018 at 5:30 am by Tom Hobson
Ham Sandwiches and Gay Sex: How Timeless Is the Bible’s Teaching? 2018-06-16T16:34:59-05:00 Tom Hobson
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
How much of the Bible is timeless, and how much is time-bound? Why is a ham sandwich OK, but gay sex is not OK? If one of these Biblical prohibitions was just for Israel, why does the other one still apply to us? Why is the command to slaughter the Canaanites not for us today? And is Jesus just for us, or is he Lord of all times and places?

“Ham Sandwich” by Ron Dollete. CC BY-ND 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/legalcode) via Flickr, cropped.
Times have changed, we are told. It’s a different world than the world to which the Bible was written. So why not junk the morality and teachings of the Late Bronze Age and the Roman Empire? Why not ditch the whole book as a piece of outdated fiction that modern people can no longer believe? Or should we try to salvage what we can from it, or mine it for whatever jewels we can find in it?
Pastor Andy Stanley has gained notoriety lately by his comments that we should “unhitch” ourselves from the Old Testament (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pShxFTNRCWI). Yet even the New Testament has its parts that many of our neighbors find hard to accept as God’s word to us today.
My aim in this post is not to prove why we should trust the Bible as our ultimate authority, although I have great confidence in why we should believe it. (See my post http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tomhobson/2018/05/literalism-and-inerrancy-both-need-careful-definition/ to see what I think about the Bible’s authority.) My objective here is to help those who already firmly believe in the Bible’s authority to sort out which parts of the Bible are meant to be timeless and universal, and which parts were directly intended only for Israel.
Paul tells believers in Romans 15:4, “Whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction.” The Hebrew sacrifices and ceremonies were not God’s command to us, but we can still learn from them. Hebrew Bible narratives give us valuable lessons we can learn about God and ourselves. Even the conquest of Canaan is not an example for us to do likewise, but a warning about Canaanite religion, which would glom onto all other religions like mercury, producing toxic results.
When the violence that is commanded numerous times in the Quran is criticized, we are often reminded that the Hebrew Bible also contains plenty of such violence. But here’s a huge difference: Jesus sets that violence aside. Islam has no equivalent re-set on its teachings. There are two verses in the Quran that argue for a peaceful approach to unbelievers (Sura 2:256, 50:45), but there is no source with the clout of a Jesus or a New Testament to set the Quran’s violence aside.
So what about the Biblical bans on ham sandwiches and gay sex? Why is the ban on gay sex still for today, while the ban on ham is just for Israel? The ban on pork is part of the kosher food laws (Leviticus 11:1-47 = Deuteronomy 14:3-20). There are no penalties given for breaking these laws. However, eating unkosher food makes you unclean, which carries a severe penalty if you try to enter the Temple in that condition.
Furthermore, the New Testament sets the kosher food laws aside. Jesus teaches in Mark 7:14-15 that there is nothing we can eat that defiles us. Twenty years later, by the time when followers of Jesus were debating whether Gentile believers had to keep kosher, Mark looks back on Jesus’ words and sees an answer to that debate: “Thus he declared all foods clean.” (Mark 7:19) Paul agrees in Romans 14:14: “I know and am persuaded that nothing is unclean in itself.” He adds in 1Timothy 4:3-4 that God created all foods to be good and to be received with thanksgiving. I am truly thankful that God created ham and pulled pork!
So the New Testament does a re-set on the kosher food laws. Not so for gay sex. The Law of Moses declares it to be a death penalty crime (Leviticus 20:13), along with numerous other offenses that the New Testament reaffirms as sin. Jesus sets aside the death penalty for all of these sins in John 8:7, but those penalties serve to mark these commands as timeless moral principles in God’s eyes. If God puts a death penalty on an offense, it must be serious.
The New Testament reaffirms all of the Ten Commandments. It also reaffirms the command against gay sex in Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9, and 1 Timothy 1:10, using a generic word that means “he who has sex with a man.” Romans 1 makes it clear that same-sex behavior among women is also included; 1 Corinthians uses words for both active and passive partners, ruling out the argument that only abusive behavior is meant. I have further argued that Jesus includes gay sex on his sin list in Mark 7:22, using a word translated as “licentiousness” or “lasciviousness.” (See my post http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tomhobson/2018/05/what-does-jesus-say-about-homosexual-behavior/.)
In addition, if we can show that God’s word on a subject like this was spoken to a world where the situation was much like ours, then God’s word to us must be the same as God’s word was to them. God’s word through Jesus and his apostles was given in a world with as much sexual freedom as ours, both gay and straight. Whoever claims that the ancients knew nothing about loving, mutual, “God-made-me-this-way” same-sex behavior, does not know the New Testament world. One of my objectives at Biblical Words and World is to prove that the Biblical world was not as backward or unlike ours, as some would claim who try to dismiss the Bible’s teachings as outdated.
The strongest Biblical attempt to set this command aside is the appeal from Acts 10:15, “What God has cleansed, you must not call common/profane,” an appeal that I find unconvincing. The only other option is to conclude that Jesus and his apostles got it wrong on this subject, which I find equally unacceptable. Jesus reaffirms the teaching of Genesis 2:24, which becomes the Bible’s central teaching on sex: “The two [man and woman] shall become one flesh.” (See my post http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tomhobson/2017/09/gods-sex-mandate-two-shall-become-one-flesh/.)
Christians today wrestle with more issues of what is timeless versus time-bound in God’s word than the issues of ham sandwiches and gay sex. What about tattoos, mixed fabric, or eating roadkill or blood sausage? You’ll find more on how we can sort out these issues in my book, What’s on God’s Sin List for Today? (https://wipfandstock.com/what-s-on-god-s-sin-list-for-today.html)
One final word: God’s word on gay sex raises a pastoral issue as to how to deal with the reality of same-sex desire. It is never loving to bless or celebrate desires that are not good for us. But underneath this particular desire is a God-given need for love and affirmation from our own gender. That becomes a problem only when we sexualize that need. Our best response as followers of Jesus is to give gay people all the non-sexual love and affirmation we can give. God’s command to love is timeless; it has not gone out the window.
Andy Stanley unhitch Old Testament
command to slaughter Canaanites
Previous Post

June 14, 2018
Be Ye Perfect? What Does Jesus Mean?
Next Post

June 21, 2018 Is Second Peter a Fraud?
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Biblical ethic Biblical word studies Biblical world Creation Historical Jesus Uncategorized
Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
According to Romans 3:23, who has sinned?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Only those who break the Ten Commandments Those who do not accept Christ Everyone The Gentiles
Books by This Author Books by Tom Hobson
Related posts from Biblical Words and World
Theology by the Polls: Ten Billion Flies Can't...
A Gospel of Glorious Half-Truth
How Much Did Paul Get from Jesus?
Gambling Is Not a Biblical Issue
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
How the author of the world's best hymn...
I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...
Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...
What About the Trees? Another Living Parable
After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...
Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...
Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...
Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go
I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...
Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...
view all Evangelical blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In










