Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Terry Mattingly

About those ‘Left Behind’ readers

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 4:49 pm   by tmatt

About those ‘Left Behind’ readers 2013-01-30T16:49:54-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When it comes to describing the end of the world, millions of readers are convinced that the “Left Behind” books contain the gospel truth.

This isn’t surprising since these 12 novels — backed by sequels, movies, video games and comic books — have sold 70 million copies. For most readers, the page-turners cranked out by writer Jerry Jenkins and preacher Tim LaHaye form a pop-culture catechism that explains some of the Bible’s most mysterious passages, said researcher Robert Woods of Spring Arbor University.

But a recent survey of “Left Behind” readers did yield one big surprise. While nearly 69 percent were, as expected, evangelical and mainline Protestants, 8.6 percent of the readers were Catholics and the remaining 22.8 percent said they practiced Islam, Judaism, Buddhism or another world religion. Why did they dig into these books?

“Curiosity was a big reason,” said Woods, who teaches communications at the evangelical campus in Michigan. “It also seems that many of them thought that by reading these books they could learn about

Christianity. … So now they think that what the ‘Left Behind’ books teach is what ordinary Christians believe about the end times.”

For many non-Christians, he said, the words “Left Behind” and “Christianity” are now tightly linked. They have been fed a pop version of “premillennial dispensationalism,” a complicated 19th Century doctrinal system that says Jesus will reign for 1,000 years on earth after the last trumpet sounds, the dead rise and the true Christians are “raptured” to meet Christ in the air.

Many Christian leaders will find this disturbing. This is especially true since there is a born-again believer in the White House and the daily news is full of explosive headlines about the Middle East, the

tense region that dominates the apocalyptic plots in these novels.

“I don’t want people to pigeonhole the Protestant view of the end times,” said Woods. “But you know, there are lots of people who, if you tell them you are an evangelical, then they are immediately going

to say, ‘That means you’re one of those Pat Robertson, Jesus freak Christians.’ Now there are people who, if you say you are an evangelical, they are going to say, ‘Oh, you’re one of those ‘Left Behind’ Christians.’ “

The Spring Arbor team — Woods, Kelly Skarritt and statistician Caleb Chan — began with a 33-item survey that was posted at the official Tyndale House website used to promote the “Left Behind” series. This invitation drew 16,916 voluntary responses. The researchers then did an in-depth, random study of 1,312 readers drawn from this larger flock.

Once again, many of the results were predictable. No one was surprised — because of previous research by evangelical pollsters — that the typical “Left Behind” reader is a female, married, white,

evangelical, politically conservative, Bible-Belt resident who is between 30-something and 50-something and who goes to church almost as often as she consumes Christian mass media.

On the other side of this divide were those least likely to appreciate the fiction of LaHaye and Jenkins. These readers were more likely to be male, single, black or Hispanic, politically progressive and residents of the American West or Northeast.

However, most of the readers — their denominational ties didn’t matter — said they believe that the “Left Behind” books are highly accurate portrayals of what the Bible teaches about the end of the world or, at least, the beliefs of conservative Christians about that subject.

When readers were asked about their motivations, the most intense clusters of responses came from those who affirmed that they read the books in order to compare what they “say about the ‘end times’ with what the Bible says” or because the series explains the “events described in the book of Revelation in an understandable way.”

The goal, said Woods, is to do more research into why so many non-Christians read the “Left Behind” series and the impact the books had on their beliefs.

“Most forms of Christian entertainment just ‘rock the flock’ that already lives in our gospel ghettos,” he said. “But it does seem that this form of media — apocalyptic fiction — is reaching some new people in our post-9/11 culture. It appears that there really are people out there who are curious about ultimate issues. We may be on the verge of another wave of rapture culture.”

Uncategorized

Christian publishing

end times

evangelicals

Revelation

Second Coming

Previous Post



July 12, 2006

Fighting blasphemy laws is blasphemy

Next Post



July 26, 2006 PG or not PG?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Wise and Foolish Virgins, what did the wise bring?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wine Bread Extra oil New clothes

Related posts from Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Talking to real, live 'Nones'

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Billy Graham & Co. push the values voters

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Stalking the anti-Mormon voters of 2012

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Jail a new church-state option for bishops?

Terry Mattingly

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religion News

What Is Catholic Integralism?

Catholic Integralists believe that religious values – specifically Christian ones – should...

Electing A Virtuous President Would Make Immunity Irrelevant

Presidential immunity can bring with it many risks. So how can we...

Why The Olympic Games Are A ‘Civil Religious’...

Sporting events form a vital space where Americans display their 'civil religious...

Farewell For Now

After more than a decade of news, research updates, and insights on...

Q: Why do Southern Baptists and like-minded Protestants...

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Why? Simple. Because they believe that’s what the...

Is Gambling Evil?

THE QUESTION: Is gambling evil? THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Analysts anticipate a...

view all Religion News blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube