Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Terry Mattingly

Pope John Paul II: What’s the lead?

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 5:16 pm   by tmatt

Pope John Paul II: What’s the lead? 2013-01-30T17:16:12-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Theologian George Weigel needs a Global Positioning System transmitter on his wrist so journalists can keep track of him.

As author of the 1008-page “Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II,” his life has been hectic since the news flash that the shepherd of the world’s 1 billion Catholics had been rushed to hospital, gasping for breath.

Weigel said a network-news reporter recently called and asked, ” ‘Where are you going to be tonight, in case something happens to the pope?’ Well, I said, ‘I’m going to church and I’m going home and eat dinner with my family. That’s what we do on Ash Wednesday. Is that OK?’ “

Reporters are trying to cover their bases. The panic also may have been fueled by another reality. This pope’s life is impossible to capture in a few dramatic images, a three-minute sound-bite blitz and a sentence or two about the length of his tenure (second longest ever) and the number of nations he has visited (125 so far).

Journalists must ask: What is the lead on this story? Thus, I contacted a circle of commentators and asked that question. Here is a sample of what I heard.

* Catholic Internet scribe Amy Welborn said she would focus this question: “Has this pope “permanently redefined the papacy?” Will it be possible for future popes to be anything other than “a big-thinking world traveler?” Many Catholics admire wonder if “management-related issues have suffered” with this emphasis on travel and media.

* Steven Waldman, CEO at Beliefnet.com, began with: “Pope John Paul II, who perhaps did more than any other person to end communism …” Who can forget when Lech Walesa signed the labor agreement at Gdansk shipyard, incarnating the Solidarity movement that helped trigger the collapse of the Soviet empire? Walesa used a pen topped with an image of the Polish pope.

* Baptist scholar Timothy George, part of the 1994 “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” coalition, cited both John Paul’s hunger for church unity and his writings, especially “Veritatis Splendor (The Splendor of Truth).” Nevertheless, George said he would lead with: “The pope has advocated the sanctity of life in a century suffused with the smell of death, whether that is the stench of the Holocaust ovens or the abortion clinics or innocent victims of terrorism and military conflict. … He is certainly the greatest pope since the Reformation.”

* Adoremus.org editor Helen Hitchcock emphasized the pope’s “Theology of the Body” reflections — gathered from Wednesday public audiences — on what it means to be human, male and female, and how this affects marriage, children, the elderly, the unborn and the sick.

While liberal Catholics complain about a “reign of terror,” Hitchcock said many conservatives also have concerns about John Paul’s legacy. “Some believe that he has been very strong on proclaiming the truth, but weaker when it comes to defending the truth. … After all, he appointed all of our bishops. They are his. That is the reality.”

* Russell Chandler, the retired religion writer for the Los Angeles Times, said he isn’t ready to write a lead yet. After all, this pope has appointed all but three of the 120 cardinal-electors who will choose his successor, including waves of red hats from Third World nations.

“I think it is not clear that the so-called John Paul II era — the Pope for the World — is going to be over,” said Chandler. “Pope John Paul II is dead. Long live the Pope. Is this era … going to continue? Watch for the smoke signal at the Vatican chimney.”

Meanwhile, Weigel is convinced reporters do not need to rush to judgment. Based on his personal contacts, he is convinced that the pope’s health is actually quite sound for an 84-year-old man who is suffering from arthritis and Parkinson’s disease.

“This whole idea that the next breath of wind that comes along is going to blow him over is just wrong,” said Weigel.

“The truth of the matter is that he is going to have his ups and his downs. We may see six or seven of these episodes in the next year or two or longer. So are we going to go crazy every time? That is going to get old fast.”

Uncategorized

Catholicism

Pope John Paul II

Religion news

Previous Post



February 9, 2005

Baylor, Bibles, boots and education

Next Post



February 23, 2005 No need for Orthodox pickles


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

A righteous man loses everything—ten children, vast wealth, and his health—yet refuses to curse God. Who endured this test?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jonah Job Solomon Joseph

Related posts from Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Dueling saints from the Second Vatican Council?

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

The life and Times of John McCandlish Phillips

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Old religion-beat questions linger, even after 25 years

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Pope Benedict XVI exits, on his own terms

Terry Mattingly

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religion News

What Is Catholic Integralism?

Catholic Integralists believe that religious values – specifically Christian ones – should...

Electing A Virtuous President Would Make Immunity Irrelevant

Presidential immunity can bring with it many risks. So how can we...

Why The Olympic Games Are A ‘Civil Religious’...

Sporting events form a vital space where Americans display their 'civil religious...

Farewell For Now

After more than a decade of news, research updates, and insights on...

Q: Why do Southern Baptists and like-minded Protestants...

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Why? Simple. Because they believe that’s what the...

Is Gambling Evil?

THE QUESTION: Is gambling evil? THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Analysts anticipate a...

view all Religion News blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube