Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Terry Mattingly

Matrix, the Apocalypse

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 4:23 pm   by tmatt

Matrix, the Apocalypse 2013-01-30T16:23:41-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Anyone looking for the “Matrix” movies at a video store knows to seek the digital mythologies shelved under “science fiction.”

That will have to do, since there isn’t a space labeled “apocalyptic.”

“These movies are truly that ambitious,” said the Rev. Chris Seay, co-author of “The Gospel Reloaded,” about faith and “The Matrix” phenomenon. “This story reads more like the Book of Revelation more than it does your normal sci-fi thriller. Everything has this other layer of meaning. … You have to wrestle with all that symbolism and philosophy if you take these movies seriously.”

That statement may sound ridiculous to most clergy, said Seay, pastor of the young Ecclesia congregation in urban Houston. But anyone who studies Hollywood knows that the Nov. 5 release of “The Matrix Revolutions” will be an event of biblical proportions to millions.

The numbers are staggering. The final movie in the trilogy will open — zero hour is 9 a.m. in New York City — on almost 20,000 movie screens in 60-plus nations. Meanwhile, Forbes estimates gross revenue for “The Matrix” and “The Matrix Reloaded” is almost $2 billion, when ticket sales are combined with videogames, music, DVDs and other merchandise.

It matters little that Andy and Larry Wachowski veered into Star Wars limbo in “Reloaded,” sinking into a swamp of linguistics and logic while striving to explain the visual mysteries of “The Matrix.” Few acolytes blinked when Larry Wachowski left his wife, hooked up with a dominatrix and, newspapers reported, began taking hormones to prepare for a sex-change operation.

Millions will flock to theaters anyway.

“Everything about these movies is getting bigger — bigger action scenes, bigger philosophical speeches, bigger rumors,” said Greg Garrett, co-author of “The Gospel Reloaded” and an English professor at Baylor University. “Now they have to justify the buzz. … I have faith that these guys are talented enough storytellers that they will be able to create some kind of cosmology that ties all this together.”

But anyone seeking one coherent set of answers has got the wrong trilogy. The only certainty in “The Matrix” universe is that its new path to enlightenment is made out of pieces of all of the older paths, even if they contradict each other. The only absolute truth is that there is no one absolute truth, no one true faith.

Instead, these movies offer a crossroads where “all of our stories collide,” write Seay and Garrett. “They not only coexist, they come together to create a story of tension, adventure and spiritual pursuit. As Buddhism, Christianity, Zen, existentialism, Gnosticism, Plato and Jacques Derrida interact with one another, we are encouraged to interact with them as well.”

This shouldn’t surprise anyone who has studied religious trends in recent generations, they added. “If movie theaters have become the new cathedrals, as cultural observers from Bill Moyers to George Lucas argue, then the priests of that domain are clad in black leather. And Cool Hand Luke, Obi-Wan Kenobi and E.T. assist in serving the sacrament.”

Yes, “The Matrix” is this kind of metaphysical myth, said actor Laurence Fishburne, who plays a Batman meets John the Baptist hero named Morpheus. Many viewers will seek, and find, deep meaning in the ties that bind Morpheus, the heroine named Trinity and the messianic Neo.

“What kids or young people will get from this divine trinity is … not for us to say,” he said, at a Warner Bros. press conference. “If they get whatever they need, then we’ve done proper service not just to the filmmakers but the larger thing, which is the story itself. So there you have it.”

So there you have what, precisely?

“The Matrix” movies show miracles, but no ultimate power that performs them. Characters make moral choices, but follow no commandments. They pray, but to an undefined god. They believe, but in what?

“We deal with all kinds of people today,” said Seay, “who believe in a Creator, but they have no idea how to articulate that belief. Their God is energy or light or love or something. But it’s real to them and they don’t want to answer that question. … ‘The Matrix’ movies are powerful because they offer people all kinds of things to believe in and none of them are very specific.”

Uncategorized

apologetics

Hollywood

Matrix

movies

postmodernism

Previous Post



October 22, 2003

Presbyterian Divorce Ahead?

Next Post



November 5, 2003 Comic book visionaries


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did Daniel survive with?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bears Leopards Wolves Lions

Related posts from Terry Mattingly

Public Square

C.S. Lewis: Still too popular after 50 years

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

'The Exorcist' -- Taking incarnate evil seriously for...

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

That Superman debate: Moses or the Messiah?

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Zombies are US, 2013 edition

Terry Mattingly

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religion News

What Is Catholic Integralism?

Catholic Integralists believe that religious values – specifically Christian ones – should...

Electing A Virtuous President Would Make Immunity Irrelevant

Presidential immunity can bring with it many risks. So how can we...

Why The Olympic Games Are A ‘Civil Religious’...

Sporting events form a vital space where Americans display their 'civil religious...

Farewell For Now

After more than a decade of news, research updates, and insights on...

Q: Why do Southern Baptists and like-minded Protestants...

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Why? Simple. Because they believe that’s what the...

Is Gambling Evil?

THE QUESTION: Is gambling evil? THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Analysts anticipate a...

view all Religion News blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube