Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Terry Mattingly

The Gospel According to the Gospel According to books

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 4:02 pm   by tmatt

The Gospel According to the Gospel According to books 2013-01-30T16:02:15-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As author of “The Gospel According to The Simpsons,” Mark Pinsky is well aware that there are no sacred cows in Springfield.

So sooner or later he expects to see Lisa Simpson walk into the family room reading a book that claims to have found theological gems in some ridiculous animated series. The book will be called “The Gospel According to Itchy and Scratchy” or maybe “Smirk On: The Spiritual Journey of Krusty the Clown.”

Homer will, of course, mock her mercilessly.

Pinsky’s 15 seconds of cartoon immortality could even come this weekend, when the series hits its 300th episode. “The Simpsons” has been renewed through 2005, making it the longest-running U.S. sitcom ever.

“I expect to get laughed at someday and deservedly so,” said Pinsky, the veteran religion writer for the Orlando Sentinel. “Anything that’s worth mocking is going to get mocked on ‘The Simpsons.’ They don’t miss much.”

If that’s the case, the scribes behind Homer, Marge, Bart and the gang are sure to have noticed that Pinsky is not alone. All kinds of scholars, theologians and preachers are suddenly sojourning in the once forbidden world of popular culture — probing everything from Bob Dylan to the Brady Bunch, from Middle Earth to Mayberry, from Tony Soprano to Harry Potter.

Pinsky’s next book will be “The Gospel According to Disney: Cartoon Faith & Values.” After all, Orlando is Orlando.

“On one level, all of this is simply more evidence — as if more was required — of the evaporating attention span of modern Americans,” he said. “Should we be embarrassed that we have to turn to popular culture in order to find ways to talk about serious religious issues? Without a doubt, yes. But this is reality.”

Anyone attempting to get a handle on the faith that is soaked into TV, movies, popular music and the rest of the mass-media universe should be prepared for surprises.

Consider the case of Homer’s next-door neighbor, the uber-evangelical Ned Flanders. He is the subject of endless jokes and sight gags, as well as the occasional salute since he is clearly the town’s most trustworthy and compassionate citizen.

“Everyone knows that Ned lives a Christian life. But even he doesn’t talk about the heart of his Christian faith,” noted Pinsky. “If you asked him how he knows that he’s saved and going to heaven, he would say he saved by grace and faith in Jesus. That’s how a Christian would answer. But nobody ever asks Ned that question.”

Thus, “The Gospel According to The Simpsons” ultimately sounds a lot like the faith proclaimed in most mainstream media. It’s the lowest-common-denominator civic faith that Pinsky summed up in five words: “Love God and do good.” Another nice summary can be found in the familiar words of the Ten Commandments.

“It’s ironic. You have what is clearly meant to be seen as a Christian family, going to a Christian church, constantly talking about Christian things, but the theological constant in ‘The Simpsons’ is Judaism,” said Pinsky, who is Jewish. Anyone who pays close attention to the faith references that weave through about 70 percent of the show’s episodes knows that “it teaches that people are saved by works, not by grace.”

“Maybe salvation by grace isn’t as funny as the Ten Commandments,” he said.

This wave of “Gospel According to” books is rooted in two trends. Some evangelicals are digging into popular culture because they are willing to take risks to reach new people. Meanwhile, the fading world of mainline religion is desperately trying to appeal to the young.

Everyone wants a new “starting point,” said Pinsky. The key is to find “starting points” that have widespread appeal, trigger strong feelings and stand the test of time. Whether religious bureaucrats like it or not, television shows, movies and songs are where Americans invest much of their time, money and emotions.

“Popular culture, if used properly, can be a kind of wedge into the consciousness of ordinary people,” said Pinsky. “All a good pastor or a youth leader or a Sunday school teacher needs is a common set of images, a language that everybody understands and stories that they already care about.

“It’s up to clergy to take it from there.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 5, 2003

Edgy Orthodoxy 4 Seekers

Next Post



February 19, 2003 Those Anglican Hitlers in Africa


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who carried Jesus' cross after He could no longer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Simon of Cyrene John Pilate

Related posts from Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Growing tensions on the Faith and Family Left

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Religious leaders struggle to reach 'emerging adults'

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Pain, hope and schisms in the long Anglican...

Terry Mattingly

Public Square

Clergy, temptation, sex abuse and the law

Terry Mattingly

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religion News

What Is Catholic Integralism?

Catholic Integralists believe that religious values – specifically Christian ones – should...

Electing A Virtuous President Would Make Immunity Irrelevant

Presidential immunity can bring with it many risks. So how can we...

Why The Olympic Games Are A ‘Civil Religious’...

Sporting events form a vital space where Americans display their 'civil religious...

Farewell For Now

After more than a decade of news, research updates, and insights on...

Q: Why do Southern Baptists and like-minded Protestants...

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Why? Simple. Because they believe that’s what the...

Is Gambling Evil?

THE QUESTION: Is gambling evil? THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Analysts anticipate a...

view all Religion News blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube