Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Terry Mattingly

Home
Religion News
Tolkien, creation & sin

Tolkien, creation & sin

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 3:57 pm by tmatt

Tolkien, creation & sin 2013-01-30T15:57:21-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

NEW YORK — Screenwriter Philippa Boyens gets a tired look in her eyes when she recalls the surgery required to turn “The Lord of the Rings” into a movie, even a sprawling trilogy of three-hour movies.

“It’s so hard,” she said. “It’s hard, it’s hard, oh God, it’s hard.”

One agonizing cut in the screenplay removed a glimpse of the myth behind J.R.R. Tolkien’s 500,000-word epic. In this lost scene, the traitor Saruman is torturing the noble Gandalf. “What,” asks the evil wizard, “is the greatest power?” Gandalf replies, “Life.”

“You fool,” says Saruman. “Life can be destroyed. Did I teach you nothing?”

Trying again, Gandalf says, “Creation.”

“Yes,” answers Saruman, “the power to create life.”

Millions of readers and now moviegoers have seen “The Lord of the Rings” as an epic tale of good versus evil.

Many have tried to pin labels on each side. The dark lord Sauron and his minions represent Nazi Germany and the armies of Middle Earth are England and its allies. Wait, said scribes in the 1960s. The forces of evil were industrialists who wanted to enslave Tolkien’s peaceful, tree-hugging elves and Hobbits. The dark lord’s “One Ring to rule them all” was the atomic bomb, or nuclear power, or something else nasty and modern.

The reality is more complex than that, said Boyens, after a press screening of “The Two Towers.” Director Peter Jackson’s second “Lord of the Rings” reaches theaters on Dec. 18.

“This is not a story about good versus evil,” she said. “It’s about that goodness and that evilness that is in all of us.”

Anyone who studies Tolkien, she said, quickly learns that the Oxford don rejected allegorical interpretations of his work.

Nevertheless, Tolkien was a devout Catholic and his goal was to create a true myth that offered the modern world another chance to understand the timeless roots of sin. Thus, even his darkest characters have mixed motives or have been shaped by past choices between good and evil. Even his virtuous heroes wrestle with temptations to do evil or to do good for the wrong reasons.

The dark lord Sauron, noted Boyens, “was your basic fallen angel. If you go back even further within this mythology, you have a world that begins with Iluvatar, who is the One, who is basically God.”

Iluvatar created the world through music, noted Boyens. But one angel, Melkor, was “jealous of the power of creation” and struck a note of discord, shattering the harmony. Yet Iluvatar did not destroy his creation. Instead, he gave his creatures the freedom to make choices between darkness and light, between evil and mercy.

It is hard to put this level of complexity on a movie screen. Nevertheless, Boyens and Jackson stressed that the “Lord of the Rings” team tried to leave the foundations of Tolkien’s myth intact. The ultimate war between good and evil is inside the human heart.

“We didn’t make it as a spiritual film, but here is what we did do,” said Jackson, who is a co-writer and co-producer as well as the director of the project. “Tolkien was a very religious man. But we made a decision a long time ago that we would never knowingly put any of our own baggage into these films. …

“What we tried to do was honor the things that were important to Tolkien, but without really emphasizing one thing over another. We didn’t want to make it a religious film. But he was very religious and some of the messages and some of the themes are based on his beliefs.”

The goal is to retain the timeless quality of the books, said Jackson.

Most of the filming for this three-movie project was done before the events of Sept. 11, 2001, he noted. The director had no way to know his movies would reach theaters during such tense times. Once again, many want to match headlines with events in Tolkien’s masterwork.

“You sort of get the impression — which can be depressing — that Tolkien’s themes really resonate today and that they’re probably going to resonate in 50 years and then in 100 years,” said Jackson. “I don’t think humans are capable of actually pulling themselves out of these basic ruts.”

Previous Post

December 4, 2002

A priest keeps his collar

Next Post

December 18, 2002 Merry tropical Christmas

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which writer besides Solomon and David contributed to Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Asaph Agur Nathan Moses