Texas Baptists face the sex wars

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 1:33 pm by tmatt

Texas Baptists face the sex wars 2013-01-30T13:33:29-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For two decades, Southern Baptists have been so busy fighting about the Bible that they’ve been some of the only church folks who weren’t fighting about sex.

Those days are gone. A band of conservatives recently broke away from the moderate Baptist General Convention of Texas and formed a new body called the Southern Baptists of Texas. The rebels said the BGCT wasn’t tough enough on abortion and homosexuality.

“We’ve got to get away from this thing of getting away from God’s word,” said the Rev. Miles Seaborn of Fort Worth, the group’s president.

This convention, which currently includes 183 churches, immediately proclaimed that “all human life is sacred, specifically life in the womb” and pledged it would reject churches that condone homosexual acts or have “pastors or deacons that are practicing homosexuals.”

This makes it sound like the old Texas convention, with its 5,700 churches, has openly backed abortion and gay rights. At its recent gathering, the BGCT backed laws requiring parental consent 48 hours before minors could have abortions. But it declined to vote on condemning abortion “in all cases except when the mother’s life is in danger” and leaders ruled out of order a motion to deny funding to any Baptist medical institution proven to perform abortions. It also defeated a call to affirm the right of local churches to ordain gays and lesbians.

Texas is one of the last fronts in the 19-year civil war in the 16-million-member Southern Baptist Convention. The Southern Baptist right – which is weak in Texas, but runs the national body – remains united on social issues and committed to “biblical inerrancy,” the belief that the Bible is without errors of any kind.

“They know who they are. They are the people who are opposed to what they see as theological liberalism and modernism,” said philosopher Mike Beaty, who teaches at Baylor University in Waco, a hub for Texas moderates. “But the moderate camp includes all kinds of people with all kinds of beliefs and these people have been united more by what they’re against – fundamentalism – than by what they are for.”

Facing a national conservative tide, moderates have rallied around the “four fragile freedoms” of Baptist life – “Bible freedom,” the “soul freedom” of individuals to interpret the Bible, “church freedom” that focuses power at the local level and “religious freedom” that strictly separates church and state. The result is what Beaty called a “tradition-less tradition” that fears any effort to coerce individual believers and congregations.

Thus, the University Baptist Church in Austin protested last spring when the BGCT said its gay-rights stands clashed with “scriptural guidelines.” The Rev. Larry Bethune asked: “What could make these Baptist principalities and powers act in such an un-Baptist way, throwing aside our deepest Baptist ideals of soul freedom, liberty of conscience and local church autonomy?”

And there’s another issue that won’t go away – Bill Clinton. Many Southern Baptists are furious about a Newsweek article arguing that the president’s moral flexibility is linked to his Baptist heritage. A key conservative, the Rev. Al Mohler of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., even said Zippergate is an “indictment of the generation of moderate and liberal Baptist leaders who served as Bill Clinton’s moral advisers, and are now his enablers in a lifestyle of gross immorality and irresponsibility.”

The Texas Baptist newspaper called this “despicable demagoguery” and noted that conservatives haven’t drawn similar conclusions from news accounts of scandals in their own camp. Editor Toby Druin noted that “the Bible I read says, ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery’ ” and this sin has touched both moderates and conservatives.

Then again, that depends on how one defines “sin” and “adultery.”

Once upon a time, Southern Baptists lived in a Bible Belt that seemed isolated from most troubling trends. It was easier to stress the positive, such as evangelism and missions, when only liberal churches far away quarreled over nasty, negative issues such as abortion and sex.

“It seemed like we could all read the Bible for ourselves and then we pretty much agreed on what it said, at least on these kinds of issues,” said Beaty. “It seemed like the culture was on our side and we were speaking the same language. It was easier back then.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 25, 1998

Walking with C.S. Lewis

Next Post

December 9, 1998 The dilemma of the December Dilemma

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Jeremiah 31:31, what did God promise to make with His people?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A new covenant A new temple A new kingdom A new law