Carter’s ‘We love God’ resolution

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 1:23 pm by tmatt

Carter’s ‘We love God’ resolution 2013-01-30T13:23:56-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For generations, Southern Baptists used a simply strategy to control any truly dangerous outbreaks of controversy.

No matter how bad things got at the Southern Baptist Convention, a respected patriarch or matriarch could always go to a microphone and propose a surge of prayer, church planting, foreign missions or evangelism. The motion would pass quickly, hot issues would vanish into a committee and everyone would hug and pose for photographs.

Insiders referred to these as “We love God” resolutions. Who could vote “no”?

It’s been a long, long time since anyone managed to get one of these to fly. However, former President Jimmy Carter — a veteran of long-odds diplomacy — recently convinced a diverse circle of Baptists to sign their names on a declaration of cooperation.

While “unresolved issues” remain, these Baptists expressed a common desire to set aside differences that might prevent a “spiritual awakening in our nation and around the world.” They urged believers to share a “common prayer effort in a spirit of Christian love” and to follow St. Paul’s call to “Be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.” They pledged to demonstrate mutual respect in “our personal devotions and public acts.”

The list of signatories includes major names from both sides of a denominational civil war that began in the late 1970s, while Carter was in the White House. Bitter theological and political fights have continued ever since, in recent years fueled in part by disputes about another Southern Baptist, President Bill Clinton. A group of “moderate” Baptists traveled to the Carter Center in Atlanta last November, while “conservatives” went in February. Carter prepared a consensus document and submitted it to participants for their suggestions.

The Rev. Tom Elliff, the SBC’s current conservative president, signed it and so did the Rev. Daniel Vestal, leader of the progressive national network, the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship. Southern Baptist Sunday School Board President Jimmy Draper signed, as did SBC Executive Committee President Morris Chapman. On the other side are leaders such as the Rev. Jimmy Allen, the last “moderate” SBC president, and Clinton-camp insider James Dunn of the Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs. One name will cause more raised eyebrows than any other — the Rev. Paige Patterson of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, one of the creators of the conservative movement that seized the SBC reins in 1979.

The document’s final statement pledges: “We will seek other ways to cooperate to achieve common goals, without breaching our Baptist polity or theological integrity, in order that people may come to know Christ as Savior, and so that God may be glorified in ever increasing measure.”

Who could vote “no”? Of course, this document may simply mean that some “moderates” recognize that the national battle to control America’s largest non-Catholic flock is over and that they have more to gain by negotiating a pledge of civility. Conservative leaders may be ready to put a softer edge on their public image, since they need increasingly independent-minded local churches to support national SBC programs.

It’s crucial that this updated version of a “We love God” resolution addresses only two social issues — pledging united efforts to promote racial reconciliation and to “end religious persecution in all nations and to encourage unfettered religious liberty for all peoples.” It avoids references to abortion and sex outside of marriage. It is silent on the issue that has so divided Southern Baptists — “biblical inerrancy,” or the belief that the Bible is without errors of any kind. References to these issues would have torpedoed the project.

Carter told the Associated Baptist Press, the news agency supported by “moderate” Baptists, that it’s embarrassing that Southern Baptists have become so infamous because of their arguments.

“I think it hurts our missionary work overseas. I think it hurts our personal testimony,” he said. “Even in the early church days there were sharp differences on theological and even organizational matters, but they worked side by side in the name of Jesus. … I think 95 percent of individual Baptists deplore the differences that have arisen.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 25, 1998

'Titanic' -- The '60s as sacraments

Next Post

April 8, 1998 Communion: Drawing doctrinal lines?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In which city did David reign seven years before becoming king over all Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shechem Jerusalem Bethlehem Hebron