A Pastoral Letter Worth Reading

Last updated on: January 30, 2013 at 12:54 pm by tmatt

A Pastoral Letter Worth Reading 2013-01-30T12:54:46-05:00 tmatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At least once a year, most religious groups feel the need to issue a lengthy document about this or that social issue.

These texts emerge after private debates in which committees write, rewrite and edit each line. Early drafts often surface in the media, before the word-crunching continues in public meetings. The results usually resemble government legislation or sausage. Rare is the person who yearns to inspect the contents.

This is ironic, since most of these statements are supposed to be practical, “pastoral” letters from leaders to the faithful.

This week, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops released “Faithful For Life: A Moral Reflection,” a pastoral statement that attempts to break the mold. First, it was created amid little fanfare or controversy. Second, the 25-page booklet is candid, concise and smoothly written.

Clearly, the writers hope that real people may actually read and understand it.

“This is about abortion and euthanasia, but there’s more to it than that,” said Helen Alvare, of the NCCB’s Office for Pro-Life Activities. “This puts these issues in a new context — the crisis in the American family. … Everything is woven together. It’s more like a meditation.”

Nevertheless, this document does address controversial social issues linked both to sex and government policies, and was released only days before a papal visit to the United States. It also closely follows an encyclical, “Evangelium vitae (The Gospel of Life),” in which Pope John Paul II condemned abortion, euthanasia and a growing “culture of death” in language that verged on a declaration of infallibility.

All of which makes the tone of “Faithful For Life” — less political and, at times, almost poetic — even more unusual.

The bishops stress that it is at life’s beginning and end that people are most vulnerable and dependent on family members and neighbors. Consider these sobering words: “Many are welcomed by these to whose care they have been entrusted. Others are not so welcomed.”

The result is a cultural nightmare — from lurid TV talk shows to death-metal music, from slasher movies about abandoned kids to bookstores full of books on loneliness. Many shattered families are failing to care for their own.

“When a family lives in fidelity it is a place of refuge and dignity,” write the bishops. “If it becomes each one only for himself or herself, then instead of being the source, school and standard for fidelity … the family can become the scene of its harshest violations. The home becomes the place where, when you knock, they no longer have to let you in.”

Part of the problem is that most of today’s loudest voices in brawls about “family values” keep stressing individual rights and responsibilities and the power of self-determination and unlimited freedom. It is in this context that the bishops must make a case for a different message: families are not built on freedom of choice, but on ties that bind.

“Faithful For Life” notes: “Many of the critical moments in our lives require that we rise to meet responsibilities given to us, not chosen by us. … We are bound to our children, not because we chose them, but because we were given them: simply because they are our children, our very near neighbors.”

In the end, parents and children must be able to trust each other. This is built on trust between husbands and wives. At some point men and women must believe that fidelity is more important than freedom, or all is lost.

The bishops insist that when “a people lose confidence in fidelity between husbands and wives, it is an easy leap to imagine that other fidelities … no longer need to be permanent, for-better-or-for-worse obligations. … Youngsters who learn that their parents destroyed or were ready to destroy a child for one reason or another — wrong gender, wrong father, wrong time, wrong health, wrong economy — can and do fear that their own claim on their parents’ love and care might go terminally wrong.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 20, 1995

'Gideon's Torch' -- A Moral Page-Turner

Next Post

October 4, 1995 High Holy Days Rites, Wrongs

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglicanism Announcements books Catholics doctrine evangelicals family life First person Godbeat Islam Judaism Mainline churches Marriage mass media movies Orthodox Politics popular culture religion sex Social issues Uncategorized Web/tech World World religions worship young people

Select a Month July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who predicted the birth of John the Baptist?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gabriel Michael Uriel Raphael