Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Through Catholic Lenses

Pro-Life & Disability Rights: Often on the Same Side but Not Always

Last updated on: April 16, 2021 at 10:10 am   by Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

Pro-Life & Disability Rights: Often on the Same Side but Not Always 2021-04-16T10:10:43-04:00 Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve written before about how disability rights groups and pro-life groups support human dignity in many of the same ways. There, I suggested that on issues like assisted suicide / euthanasia and abortion after prenatal diagnosis. A recent set of rallies in Connecticut, however, show how this can sometimes break down.

Two Rallies in Connecticut

Connecticut State Capitol building

Connecticut State Capitol building in Hartford (CC BY 2.0 jglazer75)

The Hartford Courant reports:

Disability rights activists and the lobbying arm of the Catholic Church in Connecticut have long been allies in the fight against legislation that would allow physicians to help terminally ill patients end their lives. […]

The Connecticut Catholic Conference is holding a rally just outside the Capitol at 6:30 Wednesday night to protest House Bill 6425, which would establish a framework for physicians to prescribe a lethal dose of medications for patients with less than six months to live. The rally was also organized to call attention to Senate Bill 835, which seeks to regulate [pro-life] faith-based pregnancy centers. The church views the two measures as part of its belief in the sanctity of life, “from conception to natural death.”

But members of the group Second Thoughts Connecticut, a grassroots coalition of disability rights activists, said the two issues should not be linked. The group will hold its own rally Wednesday.

“If we’re going to work together as a coalition, we have to stay focused on what our mission is and our mission is to defeat assisted suicide and related things that might jeopardize the lives of our members,’’ said Cathy Ludlum of Manchester, a leader of Second Thoughts. “The Catholic conference, by putting those two issues together in one rally, will make it harder to defeat assisted suicide strategically.’’

Some members of Second Thoughts support legalized abortion.

Read the rest on their site.

Rallies Divided by Cause or Group?

Combining two kind-of-related points together into a rally is definitely in the realm of prudential judgment.  On such matters, Catholics can disagree in good faith. Cathy Ludlum does point out how such a move breaks up a coalition. One could also ask if making a rally both for topics dilutes the voice on the two topics. I think rallies, especially one-time ones, work better when more targeted.

I can’t imagine that legislators or the general public watching the local news (or reading the article above in the local paper) will receive the rally the Connecticut Catholic conference organized versus how they would receive it were they to protest assisted suicide with disability rights people where they disagree on other topics, then next week have a different rally about how pregnancy care centers can advertise. I personally suspect that the Church’s message would be more well-received had they done one rally on assisted suicide and another on pregnancy care ads. Or even if they just assisted CareNet or someone else organizing a rally about pregnancy care center advertising.

I also assume that there was prior communication between the disability rights group, Second Thoughts, and the Connecticut Catholic Conference. In such discussion, I presume the leaders of Second Thoughts made it clear that they would not join the Conference if they rallied against two bills at once. Then what happens, is a double anti-witness. First, those opposing assisted suicide are divided which does not bode well for fighting that law. Second, the Church appears not to stand with the most vulnerable.

Ideas on Working Together

I think a few ideas I put in my prior article on this point more generally can be repeated here:

[Principles:] When I read about disability rights advocates who accept or silently condone abortion, or when I look at pro-life materials and find almost nothing on the disabled, I cringe. Both disability rights and pro-life groups adhere to the same basic principle—that humans have inherent dignity based on who they are, not what they can do—yet they too often disagree.

The two groups should be wayfarers on a common path. […] [Abortion:] Those diagnosed with Down syndrome prenatally are aborted at alarming rates. In the United States, two-thirds of such babies are killed in the womb. That may seem high, but it is low among developed countries: England aborts 77 percent of these babies, Denmark 90 percent and Iceland 98 percent. […]

It is easy to imagine that [greater genetic testing] could lead to parents wanting to “discard”—what a euphemism for kill—those who are predicted to have low I.Q. scores. Also, a current study is investigating the genes of 50,000 families to discover autism genetics, and I can imagine this leading to the search for a prenatal autism test.

Referring to selective abortions in these conditions, Pope Francis stated last year, “We do the same as the Nazis to maintain the purity of the race, but with white gloves.” […]

[Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia] is becoming more targeted toward the disabled. And this is the greatest way the disabled can be discriminated against. Killing someone due to a disability is akin to participating in an attempt to erase the disabled community. Not only is this far worse than, say, refusing to build a wheelchair ramp or to provide signage for the sight-impaired, it works toward removing the disabled community from society’s consciousness and thus makes it more difficult to build support for disabled rights.

Read the rest there.

Conclusion

Disability rights are about human dignity and human rights. The Pro-Life position is about human dignity and human rights. We should find ways to work together for human rights. Politics is the realm of the possible and sometimes we have to create alliances for a goal where members of the alliance disagree on other goals. Every time we vote for a politician, we do that, at least implicitly, as there are members of both major parties and most minor parties who have goals at odds with Catholicism. This is key in issues like assisted suicide but also comes into play in other issues.

Note: Please support me on Patreon to keep writing more like this.

Become a Patron!

Disability

Moral Theology

News Analysis

Pro-Life

US Politics

Assisted Suicide

Connecticut

Disability

euthanasia

Human Rights

Moral Theology

Politics

Pro-Life

Previous Post



April 9, 2021

From Founding a Startup to Deloitte to the Convent

Next Post



April 18, 2021 The Inconsistency of Moral Lines in Cooperation (Lincare Quarterly)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Autism Bioethics Book Review Business and Economics Catholic Social Teaching Culture Diocesan Life Disability Discipleship Euthanasia Family Life Genetics Global Politics History Immigration Inspiration Interview Liturgy Moral Theology My Life News Analysis Original Articles Prayer Privacy Pro-Life Science Sexual orientation or identity Social Media Sports Technology Theology Uncategorized US Politics Vatican

Select a Month March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil's work"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter John Jesus

Support this
Column

Related posts from Through Catholic Lenses

Catholic

Sensory-Friendly Mass Directory Now Available

Through Catholic Lenses

Catholic

Greg Locke, Autism Is not Demonic

Through Catholic Lenses

Catholic

The Church Cannot Change Teaching on Homosexuality (Hollerich...

Through Catholic Lenses

Catholic

Catholic Media: Fides Quarens Rem Publicam

Through Catholic Lenses

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Religious Liberty For All, Not Just Christians

As a strong defender and promoter of religious liberty, I have consistently...

Is Faith Really Blind? What Skeptics Get Wrong

Faith is belief without evidence and reason. So saith the famous (infamous?)...

Glory Is Found In Christ, Not False Piety

Paul warned us not to engage false piety; not only does vainglory...

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube