Withdrawing Ventilators in Triage: A Catholic Approach

Last updated on: January 6, 2021 at 10:08 am by Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

Withdrawing Ventilators in Triage: A Catholic Approach 2021-01-06T10:08:03-05:00 Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As you may know, I am currently writing a doctoral degree in moral theology. Another priest-friend of mine, Fr. Louis Melahn, LC, is doing the same, but in Rome. He and a few others have taken up the issue of what to do in the case there are insufficient ventilators in an ICU. As ICUs reach 100% capacity with COVID, this might become an issue that comes up in US hospitals. I think Fr. Louis and the other collaborators make a good argument for not removing a ventilator that is still helping someone. The article gets a little academic but is worth the read if you have some background. Below I offer two summaries. One Fr. Louis made for me and the official abstract.

Fr. Louis’s Summary on Triage with Ventilators

Lt. Cmdr. Michael Heimes checks on a patient connected to a ventilator at Baton Rouge General Mid City campus (CC BY 2.0 US Navy)

Here’s a summary Fr. Louis sent me that he thought would be more accessible to an average reader:

COVID-19 has sparked fears that hospitals could be critically short in essential resources, such as mechanical ventilators. Fortunately, up to now, critical shortages have been localized, but there are lingering ethical questions.

No one seriously argues that hospitals are in the wrong if they allocate their limited resources as best they can, even if some patients end up without it. Our article instead focuses on something else: could care that is already begun (say, mechanical ventilation) be withdrawn against the will of the patient, in order to give it to someone who would benefit more?

In asking that question, we are assuming that the patient being treated is benefiting from the care. Clearly, there is no particular problem in withdrawing care that is futile or counterproductive—and in fact, it might even be acceptable to override a patient’s unreasonable demands in an emergency.

Our conclusion is that, once care is started, the patient and his caregivers enter into a relationship that entails certain rights for the patient and certain obligations to the caregivers: including the continuing of care, so long as it is reasonably regarded as beneficial.

Deliberately withdrawing such care, and thus provoking the death of the patient, would be a form of direct (that is, intentional) killing and is therefore morally unacceptable—even if the care is withdrawn in favor of patients who would (according to medical personnel’s nest judgement) benefit more.

The Abstract of the Ventilator Paper

Here’s the abstract from the academic journal’s website.

The advent of COVID-19 has been the occasion for a renewed interest in the principles governing triage when the number of critically ill patients exceeds the healthcare infrastructure’s capacity in a given location. Some scholars advocate that it would be morally acceptable in a crisis to withdraw resources like life support and ICU beds from one patient in favor of another, if, in the judgment of medical personnel, the other patient has a significantly better prognosis. The paper examines the arguments for and against this approach from the point of view of natural law theory, especially using the principle of double effect. We conclude that it is inadmissible to withdraw life-saving medical interventions from patients who are still benefiting from them, on the sole grounds that other patients might benefit more. Those who are currently using such technology should only interrupt their treatment if, in the judgment of medical personnel and, if possible, taking into account the wishes and needs of the patient and his family, the treatment is deemed futile, burdensome, or disproportionate.

You can read the whole article for free if you want. I read the whole thing but can’t think of much not covered int he two summaries above.

Hopefully, this helps you understand one of the challenges we face with COVID patients overwhelming ICUs.

Note: Please support me via Patreon so I can keep writing content like this.

Fr. Michael Baggot LC

ICU

Moral Theology

Ventilator

Previous Post

December 29, 2020

Fr. Nix Is More Confused About Vaccines Than I Thought

Next Post

January 7, 2021 Requiring Genetic Tests Violates Fundamental Human Rights

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Autism Bioethics Book Review Business and Economics Catholic Social Teaching Culture Diocesan Life Disability Discipleship Euthanasia Family Life Genetics Global Politics History Immigration Inspiration Interview Liturgy Moral Theology My Life News Analysis Original Articles Prayer Privacy Pro-Life Science Sexual orientation or identity Social Media Sports Technology Theology Uncategorized US Politics Vatican

Select a Month March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz