Warning: Fr. Tetherow Is Back at an Independent Latin Mass Chapel

Last updated on: February 27, 2020 at 12:53 pm by Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

Warning: Fr. Tetherow Is Back at an Independent Latin Mass Chapel 2020-02-27T12:53:35-05:00 Fr. Matthew P. Schneider, LC

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Screenshot of St. Michael’s website with Fr. Tetherow listed (fair use as a major point here is that he was removed but has been added back on the site)

A year ago, I reported on how the diocese had dealt well with a priest once child pornography was found on his computer. Fr. Virgil Bradley Tetherow, who also goes by Fr. Gabriel Francis, was quickly suspended and later defrocked. I think the diocese did what they could to deal with the situation and they can’t really do much except warn people once he’s defrocked.

When I wrote the article in January 2019, it looked like Fr. Tetherow was no longer involved in the independent Latin Mass chapel as his name had been scrubbed from their website and Facebook page. (I should have used the Wayback Machine to save this, but I did not think of it at the time and nobody else saved the clergy/pastor page either.) However, his name is back on the St. Michael the Archangel website as the pastor. (See the image on the right.) Also, regular homilies by Tetherow from the past year are posted on the site.

On the other hand, Fr. Tetherow was part of the guild of St. Peter Ad Vincula, a loose group of “independent Catholic” priests. However, after they found out about what he had done about a year ago, he was removed. I could not find him or the chapel he is the pastor of on their website. I double-checked by calling, Fr. Bernard Hall, the priest in charge of the guild and he confirmed that Fr. Tetherow was no longer a first order member of the guild. However, the website of the chapel still has links back to this guild.

In my prior post, I drew three conclusions from his case. First, the Dallas charter generally works as things seemed properly dealt with once child pornography was found. Second, the Church is limited in what it can do about priests who abused. The Church kicked him out of the clerical state and cooperated fully with authorities, but having Church jails or similar would be problematic (& I doubt any of us want that). As he pled down to a lesser charge, he was not registered as a sex offender so there isn’t much even the state can do once he served his time. Finally, I noted we need vigilance. We need vigilance to watch out for abusers and then to warn others about abusers once they are discovered.

A few months ago, the AP noted that 900 laicized priests work in jobs with access to children. I write this article to warn others about Gabriel Tetherow. I feel obliged as I am one of the few who has written about him in the past. There is not much the Church can do to prevent a laicized priest from working with children like those in the AP report, however, I can write this warning. I really don’t want to write this article but feel obliged to correct my prior article as it comes up high in Google search for him and it incorrectly states he is not at the chapel.

Tetherow still claims to be a Catholic priest, while having admitted to downloading child pornography. I would recommend against independent or Sedevacantist Latin Mass chapels for various reasons. This chapel was listed on a directory of Sedevacantist Masses. I emailed them on January 23rd mentioning the issues with Fr. Tetherow, but they have not removed his Masses. I have no issue with Catholics who prefer this liturgy, but please find an FSSP, ICKSP, diocesan Latin Mass, or other extraordinary form churches in Communion with Rome. Even if you insist on going to one, I want to warn you against the one run by Fr. Tetherow due to his abusive past. If you are in the same area as Tetherow, St. Joseph’s in Lancaster and Mater Dei in Harrisburg offer Extraordinary Form Latin Mass in Communion with Rome.

Child protection is serious and we need to try our best even when a priest is laicized to prevent him from having access to children. However, the Church has limits on her power in cases like this so we have to rely on warnings like this blog. Unfortunately, I cannot see much else that can be done here.

Note: My community relies on donations and writing these blogs pays almost nothing. You can support me monthly on Patreon or one-time via Acceptiva.

Fr. Virgil Bradley Tetherow

Latin Mass

Priesthood

sedevacantism

Previous Post

February 22, 2020

Patron Saint of the Internet? Carlo Acutis to Be Beatified

Next Post

February 28, 2020 Non-Verbal Autistic Child Denied Communion: Some Lessons (Updated)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Autism Bioethics Book Review Business and Economics Catholic Social Teaching Culture Diocesan Life Disability Discipleship Euthanasia Family Life Genetics Global Politics History Immigration Inspiration Interview Liturgy Moral Theology My Life News Analysis Original Articles Prayer Privacy Pro-Life Science Sexual orientation or identity Social Media Sports Technology Theology Uncategorized US Politics Vatican

Select a Month March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz