Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Thought Life

Home
Evangelical
Making Men Moral: Hadley Arkes on the Indissoluble Connection Between Law and Morality

Making Men Moral: Hadley Arkes on the Indissoluble Connection Between Law and Morality

Last updated on: February 27, 2009 at 7:30 pm by Owen Strachan

Making Men Moral: Hadley Arkes on the Indissoluble Connection Between Law and Morality 2009-02-27T19:30:49-07:00 Owen Strachan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

moral22 The biography of Hadley Arkes, the conference’s final speaker:

“Hadley Arkes has been a member of the Amherst College faculty since 1966. He was the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence, and was appointed, in 1987, as the Edward Ney Professor of American Institutions. He has written five books with Princeton University press: Bureaucracy, the Marshall Plan, and the National Interest (1972), The Philosopher in the City (1981), First Things (1986), Beyond the Constitution (1990), and The Return of George Sutherland (1994). His most recent book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose, was published by Cambridge University Press in the fall of 2002. Professor Arkes has been the founder, at Amherst, of the Committee for the American Founding, a group of alumni and students seeking to preserve, at Amherst, the doctrines of “natural rights” taught by the American Founders and Lincoln.”

The following is my summation of Arkes’s closing remarks.

Introduction
I am breathing the fresh air of a red state! This is quite the joy, coming from Massachusetts, the people’s republic. They wouldn’t take my currency down here, with it’s picture of Dukakis on it.

Quoting Samuel Johnson: “geometricians by accident, but moralists by necessity.” The very mark of the polis was the law. This binds our private preference in favor of a public concern. To come to moral judgment is to speak in the voice of command, which forbids the torture of children or the killing of a baby.

Yet the most curious thing is that many elites have denied this fundamental principle. Robby’s book stands as a notable marker to restore the classic connection between morality and law. It’s impossible to have law without morality. It’s like asking for coffee without syntax. We now see legislators who work extremely hard to avoid any notion of morality in their legal language. This is ridiculous. When David Souter, for examples, encounters the issue of topless dancing, he moves to the secondary issue of how an establishment featuring this activity will draw pickpockets. This is bankrupt.

Laws Are Not Invitations
When we make laws, we do not invite people to obey, we say that we are displacing their personal choice. The rule of action will shape all subsequent conduct in this realm. Every great political philosopher has considered this question. We must explain the principle of “rightness” so that we can make laws that are “right” and “valid” for others. If something is wrong, it’s wrong for everyone. In the Lincoln-Douglas debate, Douglas professed to have no moral judgment. Lincoln retorted rightly that this was a moral judgment.

A part of what I want to bring out today is that the logic of morals is anchored in the logic of reason. From the left, with the homosexual lobby, first the left denied the presence of morality in laws, then brought morality back in to silence those who oppose gay marriage. First, we heard that one could not legislate “taste” on sexuality any more than one could legislate taste for frozen yogurt. So there was no grounds for casting judgments–but wait! There was a wrong: casting judgments! So those who barred gay couples from adopting needed to have judgments cast against them. It also becomes fine for people to be prosecuted when they dare to preach about the homosexual lifestyle, which is “judging.”

The Purpose of the State
With these steps, we move closer to Aristotle’s understanding of the state: to inculcate moral sense and good judgment in the people. The law teaches that we will move from the domain of private preference to a matter of moral consquence. In Massachusetts in November 2003, the Supreme Court struck down the constitutional rules on marriage. The judgment of the Court produced “natural recoil of shock.” However, several years later, the people had changed their mind. Where once most opposed same-sex marriage, now there seemed to be a slight majority for it. This was what Machiavelli called “a new regime” with new laws. Schoolchildren were now taught from as early as the first-grade what sexual acts between men look like. School budgets would now pay for gay and lesbian-friendly programs. Money came into play; legislators were bought off.

As we can see, all people do indeed make moral judgments. The preceding shows that there is a moral dimension built into the very fabric of politics. It is in the very heart of it. One cannot avoid it. Arkes pointed to a law that argued that the discrimination against blacks was hurting the inter-state commerce in meat. He pointed out satirically that the abortion industry, with 1.3 million babies killed, hurt the sale of bassinets. There is something wrong with this rationale that the federal government is using to legislate morality.

Being Clear About Right and Wrong
We need to be clearer about the wrong. In the past, state governments and local governments took responsibly for moral matters. The federal government was thought to have a far more limited scope of concerns. John Marshall once mused on what would happen if a state desired to dissolve marriage without the consent of the couple. Here he showed that something could arise that could bring marriage within the reach of the federal constitution. So Dred Scott would have to come back to Missouri, because it didn’t recognize marriage between slaves. This has happened more recently as well.

It requires one Kantian insight to make sense of this matter. There is nothing that we can name, no activity, so prosaic that it cannot be part of a means-end chain that cannot inflict harm. An ambulance can either help save lives or kill a street-crossing pedestrian. As we have seen, even the most local of subjects could handle issues that bear on matters of the Constitution. My argument is that there is no way that one can make law without moral arguments. The effort to finesse moral questions on secondary grounds fails. Laws must be made through the substance of moral thinking itself. The notion of a national government of limited powers falls into a fallacy if we think that we can write a list of subjects that the federal government cannot reach. The example of Roe v. Wade, among other laws, show us that the national government will readily reach into all areas.

In closing, then, the notion of a limited government makes eminent sense. I would suggest that a limited government does not require a Constitution. Restraint may be found, I think, in the very idea of the self, the human person. Limits come upon human autonomy; there are certain wrongful things that people must forgo in living in the state. To put it differently, they are thus encouraged to concentrate their full range of powers on good things.

Plato: the person with the well-ordered soul, governed by reason, had a constitutional ruler within himself. A government under constitutional restraint takes its model from the person who controls himself and rules his appetites by the power of reason. The person with self-control is not the weaker person, but the stronger. So it is with government.

Conclusion
Again: geometricians by accident, but moralists by necessity. We must face moral questions either well or badly. We cannot escape them. It is time to reconcile ourselves to the notion that this is the life we lead, and the life we must learn to do well.

Remarks on Neuhaus
His persistent line: we can still turn this around. He always saw the capacity of human beings to reach outside themselves and do something extraordinary. We buy up our friends, and ply others with compensation, saying, whenever you are as certain about something as I am, go forward; when you are uncertain, hesitate; if ever you go wrong, come back. In this way, we will make our way to the One of whom it is said: Seek His face. Seek His face always.

My Take
This was a splendid lecture. Arkes has a golden pen. He also speaks very clearly and peppers his speaking with all sorts of fun stories and practical illustrations. His central contention, that none of us can help but be moralists, immediately convinced me of its aptness. This is surely, incontrovertibly right. If you sit back and think about it for a moment, and let it sink in, you’ll be convinced. We can’t avoid moral questions. We all face them. Our society cannot help but confront them.

Arkes left the logic of the left exposed like the emperor marching in his parade. He showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that the left plays an ideological shell game to advance its ideas. First, it says that we shouldn’t legislate morality; then, it creates a case for its positions; then, it invokes the language of morality to ground its positions, claiming unassailable moral territory; finally, it brings the hammer, enacting its laws and excoriating and judging all who go against its views.

This process, furthermore, has the effect of creating cultural impressions. People’s minds change as this process develops, such that in the beginning they disagree and by the end they end up thinking, “Yeah, this issue (gay marriage, abortion as choice, etc.) really isn’t my business. It really is a matter of choice, and I don’t want anybody impinging on my right to choose.” But Arkes shows us that this thinking is off-course from the start. We have to legislate choices. Unless we desire a law-less state in which anyone can do anything that they want, we must realize that we already desire a state driven by law, which is of course driven by morality (the basic moral questions, remember, must make their way into our legal code). In addition, all who affirm a doctrine of sin (and even those who don’t!) must remeber per Arkes that it is not wrong to mark actions as wrong, but right. We Christians must not buy the left’s logic on morality, both because it is disingenuous and also because we must restrain sin and evil.

Arkes’s taxonomy of liberal activism was itself worth the time of the lecture. But his talk was much richer than that. He is a deeply profound thinker. I commend his thinking and writing to all.

Previous Post

February 27, 2009

Making Men Moral: The Book Itself

Next Post

February 27, 2009 Making Men Moral: Who Is David Dockery?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "heaven is a world of love" 9Marks abortion academics Adam Sandler adoption adultery adulthood aesthetics aging ajith fernando al mohler alice walker America american education american shaolin apologetics architecture atheism atonement august rush barack obama baseball basketball batman beauty berry mauve or muted wine Bible biblemesh biblical studies biblical theology biblical womanhood billy wolfe blogging bob kauflin body book culture book reviews boston celtics boston college bowdoin college bowling alone boyce college boyhood Brooke Fraser Bruce Ware bullies bullying business business ethics C.S. Lewis calling calvinism canada Capitol Hill Baptist Church carl henry carl trueman carolyn mahaney cbmw celebrity Chicago child's play children Christ Christ and culture Christian education christian hedonism christian ministry Christian vocation christian womanhood christianity and culture church government church history church internships church life church matters blog church membership church planting cities CJ Mahaney colin adams college college admissions college life college ministry collin hansen complementarianism conferences congregational worship conservative thought consumerism conversion council on biblical manhood & womanhood council on biblical manhood and womanhood covenant life church creativity credo magazine credobaptism cross movement crossway books crucifixion culinary culture cultural engagement cultural theology culture culture shift d. a. carson dads daily mail dan barry dancing with the stars daniel dennett darrell bock dating David Barash davy rothbart death death of God debt desiring God developmental league devotional thoughts dick morris dining disability discipleship doug sweeney douglas groothius economics economy education egalitarianism eliot spitzer ella rose strachan enlightenment entrepreneurs entrepreneurship environmentalism Eric Metaxas ethics evangelical theological society evangelicalism evangelism extended adolescence extreme home makeover family fatherhood feminism fiction film flame food foodstuffs football four gospels frank miller friendship gay gay Christianity gender roles genderblog george marsden girltalk gk chesterton God gospel gospel of John gospel risk gq greek mythology guillermo del toro happiness harold ockenga Harvard health heaven height hell henry center herb london higher education hillsdale hip hop historical theology history holidays holiness Holy Spirit home-school homemaking homes homosexuality hope human dignity human flourishing human life image of God imagination intellectual Christianity intellectual life iron man Islam J.I. Packer james mcavoy James Q. Wilson jeremy lin Jesus Christ jim hamilton joe namath John Calvin John McCain john owen john piper john rockefeller jonathan edwards journalism justice justin taylor kairos journal keira knightlet la times leadership lesbian life of the mind Lifeway links literature Lord's prayer louie giglio love male sex drive mall manhood manners Mark Dever Mark Driscoll marriage mars hill martial virtue martin luther masculinity materialism matthew hall maureen dowd memoirs of an ordinary pastor mentoring military millennials ministry missional missions monergism moral argument morality motherhood music national review nba new atheism new england New Testament new york new york times new yorker newsweek nietzsche northeast notre dame npr obedience oprah oprah's big give orphan care overheated prose award owen wilson pain parenting Park Community Church pastor-theologian pastoral ministry pastors persecution philosophes philosophy political philosophy politics poverty prayer preaching presidency presidential race pro-life professors proverbs psychology public school public square public theology publications quebec quilting race racism radical womanhood rap music rc sproul rebecca walker Reformation 21 relevant magazine religious liberty resources revelation revival richard dawkins richistan risky gospel robbie george robert putnam ron chernow Russ Moore salvation salvo magazine sam harris same-sex attraction sanctification scholarship science scripture secularism seminaries seminary life sex sex drive sexual ethics sexuality sexualized culture shooting sacred evangelical cows shootings simple church singleness social justice social media social networking Southern Baptists southern seminary sovereign grace Spanglish spirituality sports sports illustrated sports injuries stanford steve mccoy suburbia suffering superhero t. suzanne ellder Tea Leoni technology television the darjeeling unlimited the gospel coalition the southern baptist theological seminary the wackness theological journalism theology theology of work thinking Thom Rainer tim challies tim keller time magazine titan Together for the Gospel tom carson tom wolfe tragedy transgender travel trinity trinity evangelical divinity school truth twitter ty pennington unashamed workman Uncategorized violence virtue vocation voddie baucham war wayne gretzky wayne grudem weddings wikipedia will smith williams winnie hu womanhood work world magazine worship writing youth sports

Select a Month August 2021 July 2021 May 2021 March 2021 December 2020 October 2020 June 2020 February 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet was taken up to heaven in a whirlwind?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Elijah Jeremiah Elisha