Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
Evangelicals, Trump and the Apostle Paul

Evangelicals, Trump and the Apostle Paul

Last updated on: September 10, 2024 at 11:26 am by Christy Thomas

0 Comments

Evangelicals, Trump and the Apostle Paul 2024-09-10T11:26:48-05:00 Christy Thomas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As I read, I noted that the author’s description and defense of the Apostle Paul matched the evangelical description and defense of Trump.

Apostle Paul and Trump: everyone excuses their behaviors

Church Crowning Trump by David Hayward. Used with permission.

It suddenly made sense to me. Evangelicals love Trump/Paul because it gives them an excuse to behave badly.

I started reading Paul Behaving Badly: Was the Apostle a Racist, Chauvinist JERK? shortly after the Evangelicals elected as President of the US the unqualified, greedy, morally-compromised, power-hungry, sexually-predatory, non-stop liar, say-anything-to-anyone-to-get-votes including the wholesale embrace of a white supremacist platform, Donald Trump.

Time after time as I read, I noted in the margin that the author’s description and defense of the Apostle Paul matched the evangelical description and defense of Trump.

However, I doubt that this is what the authors, E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien, both professors at Southern Baptist-affiliated colleges, had in mind when they wrote the book.

They implore the reader to trust them as they state their basic affirmation: The Bible is 100% true. Standing on that platform, they fearlessly expose most of the parts of Paul’s writings that are particularly disturbing to the modern reader of the Bible. They then offer a response using the historical/critical method, looking carefully at the cultural settings in which the words were written.

Here’s what I gleaned:

Did Paul say racist, demeaning things about people? Absolutely, but it’s OK: he didn’t really mean it and was truly progressive. Paul didn’t dislike other races or his fellow Jews. He really, genuinely, bigly loved them and, of course, those he routinely insulted actually knew that.

Did Paul offer unbelievably bad put-downs of all things female? After all, in Paul’s world, only males reflect the glory of God–women have to make do with reflecting the glory of the males in their lives. And males are saved by Jesus, females by childbearing.

Well, yes, absolutely he did write these things, but it’s OK: he didn’t really mean it. Truly, he was bigly advanced for his era and really, absolutely wanted women to have full rights, but he just couldn’t say it. I’m sure the women understood exactly what he meant when he told them to be quiet and ask their husbands their silly little questions later.

Did Paul flip-flop on multiple positions, saying one thing to one group of people and another to different groups? Did he use incendiary language with one group, but more peaceful language with another? Absolutely!!! And it’s OK because Paul was God’s chosen vessel, and needed to get the word out any way possible.

Did Paul say simply awful, condemnatory things about homosexuals and their sexual practices? Absolutely! And even better: he really meant this one. There is no place in Paul’s world for those despicable ones. Kick ‘em out, Lock ‘em up!

Did Paul blatantly misuse passages from the Hebrew Bible to make his point? Darn right–and the authors acknowledge he would have flunked a beginning class on biblical interpretation today.

But it’s OK. According to the authors, most of us are simply not able to understand Paul’s reasoning and use of interpretative methodologies employed by the Pharisees for biblical exegesis. In many ways, the authors ended up indicating that the very methodology they used throughout the book, i.e., reading the words of Paul in the more accurate historical, cultural setting, is actually inadequate to properly interpret Paul. They backed themselves into a fascinating bind here.

It’s fairly clear by now that I didn’t like the book a whole lot although I fully intended to. To be fair, it is written in an engaging, readable fashion, accessible to a wide range of people without theological educations. Both authors have a great ability to communicate their points to modern readers. And for those who need to have Paul affirmed, despite some of his more despicable utterances, it is genuinely helpful.

But their own web of “political correctness” backs the authors into a corner. They acknowledge that at times Paul was just wrong. But they are unable to see that acknowledging this makes their affirmation that the Bible is 100% true problematic. Nonetheless. they have no choice but to vindicate Paul or they will lose their livelihoods. Even worse, their carefully constructed belief systems will crumble.

This is and always has been the problem with the “100% true” or “inerrancy” world of Biblical interpretation. Try though they might, those in that world dare not take a step back and simply let the Bible unfold in all its humanness, in its wandering paths taken by people to make sense of the world and of God’s redemptive hopes for this broken, messed up place.

Instead, that world elevates certain people, almost always men, who do indeed “behave badly” and justifies the badness under the uncritical blanket of “This is God’s man–Listen to him.”

And so, we end up with generations of people endorsing slavery and upholding racism, treating women with contempt, excluding those who don’t fit the sexual binary and following the latest iteration of the strong-man/bad-boy saviour rather than the actual good news: God is with us and in the name of Jesus Christ, we are forgiven.

Evangelical

Religion News

Politics and Religion

About Christy Thomas

I am an opinionated Jesus-follower, a retired elder in the United Methodist church, a questioner of everything, and a lover of grace. I am married to a wonderful man and together we claim 11 children and 12 grandchildren. I love to travel, garden, walk and connect ideas together. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

November 21, 2016

Ask the Thoughtful Pastor: What about Christmas gifts?

Next Post

November 29, 2016 We must resist the spread of WMSVD disease

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Stepping away from his campaign for 13 days handed his opponents a gift which they ..."

Bob Shiloh

The Lies and Hypocrisy Are Degrading ..."

"Thank you. We really do need to practice what we preach. And hardly any of ..."

The Rev. Dr. Christy Thomas

The Lies and Hypocrisy Are Degrading ..."

"Mrs. Thomas, Reverend Jefferies became the pastor of First Baptist Dallas in August 2007 – ..."

glen smith

I Ache For The People Of ..."

"I sent you a reply which for some reason was not deemed appropriate for posting. ..."

linda_rob

I Ache For The People Of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category " obedience abortion accommodation accountability administration adolescence Advent advice an ordinary death anxiety apology apportionments Ash Wednesday ask thoughtfulpastor baptism betrayal Bible bondage calling certainty change character charity children Christianity Christmas church church as garden clergy clergy credentials closure comfort compassion competition compromise Confirmation conservation conservative conspiracy theories consumer conversion coronavirua corruption courage covenant cultural context death Deconstruction discipleship discord divorce doctrine doing good drugs dysfunctional Easter Easter; Resurrection education election entertainment envy escape evaluation evil exclusive church exercise faith faithfulness family fasting fear feast featured film review finances first world problem food forgiveness fundamentalist garden gay marriage General Conference generosity giving thanks GLBT glory good government grace guilt habit happy harmony hateful acts healing health health care heaven hell hello/goodbye heresy hidden agenda holiness homelessness homosexuality humility hymn hypocrisy Imago Dei In training inclusive church indulgence injustice innocents insurance intolerance itinerancy joy Justice kindness Kingdom of Heave kingdom of heaven language laughter laundry lawsuit leadership Lent LGBTQ liberal life Little Things Matter longform meandering thoughts memories mercy metaphor metrics miracle misfortunes morality Mormon Muslim mystery worship natural disasters New Category Name nutrients older adults oppression pain Paleo paperwork partnered pastor peace pension pharmaceutical placebo politics poverty prayer privilege public schools questions quiet racism rain reason reconciliation religion repentance requirements rescue respect rest resurrection retirement Sabbath sacrament sacred salvation same-sex marriage sanctuary schism schooling science SCOTUS secrecy separation of church and state sexism sexuality short cuts silence sin sleep soil spiritual journey stillness suffering surgery sustainable church teacher technology thank you theology therapy thinking tolerance TOS trust truth Uncategorized welcome Why Easter? wisdom women worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 December 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 March 2025 February 2025 December 2024 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 April 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 October 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 March 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz