Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Gluten-Free=Gay-Free? A Call to Consistency #UMC

Gluten-Free=Gay-Free? A Call to Consistency #UMC

Last updated on: June 18, 2014 at 3:03 pm by Christy Thomas

Gluten-Free=Gay-Free? A Call to Consistency #UMC 2014-06-18T15:03:05-05:00 Christy Thomas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Christ our Lord invites to his table all who love him, earnestly repent of their sin and seek to live in peace with their neighbor unless . . . you can’t eat regular bread and don’t participate in the sexual life of regular people and then the invitation is rescinded.”

I wrote this after yet one more time, I was excluded from the Sacrament. It was Annual Conference, Monday morning. As a United Methodist Clergy, Annual Conference is my church. Ultimately, this is the place where I worship with those who are deeply connected to me.

I arrived very early that morning, wanting to get settled, write a few minutes, and then attend the early morning Worship and Holy Communion.

So I did. And a few minutes into the service, I realized that there was only one chalice on the communion table. That meant that even if gluten-free bread were provided, I would probably not be able to participate. As it turns out, apparently a gluten-free bread was provided, but the Celebrant chose to disregard it. It was not mentioned at the invitation. Even with just one chalice, he could have made it work for he could have called forward the gluten-free first, so we could participate with the common cup before it was contaminated. But the Celebrant chose to ignore the option completely, excluding me and any others in my situation from participation in the sacrament.

One more time, I was left out because in order for me to receive the Sacrament, I have to practice “safe communion.” Otherwise, I will be very sick for a minimum of 48 hours. It will be 48 lost hours, two full days of wondering if I have been poisoned.

Essentially, I’m a lot of trouble for those who must set up the communion table and for those who are appointed to serve as Celebrants.

Since my retirement, I have been facing multiple obstacles in observing a spiritual discipline that is extremely important to my soul life. Two churches, hearing ahead of time that I was visiting, did go to great lengths to offer sweet hospitality to me so I could be a full participant. Another offered a gluten-free option, but the servers picked up the gluten-free wafer with the same hand they had been using to tear the regular bread. I choose not to describe here the misery that followed.

Recently, I was in conversation with a good friend who attends worship at a nearby Episcopal church. I wondered if it might be an option to attend their weekly early Sunday morning Eucharist. She checked with someone there about whether a gluten-free option was available, and forwarded to me this response: “Yes, we do. It’s a rice wafer. Father needs to know before the service how many he’ll need and who needs them. We have a few regulars that he knows about and accommodates, but if it’s someone new, he needs to know beforehand.”

I felt kicked in the gut by that response. Why do I think it is not necessary for the gluten-normal to make an appointment to receive the sacrament? Does the priest require them to indicate in advance that they will be there? I seriously doubt it. This is not Christian hospitality. I shall not trouble them further.

I’ve wondered if those from whom I request to provide a way for me to receive the sacrament think silently, “You are not really gluten-intolerant. You just think you are and need to repent. After all, Jesus said of BREAD, not some rice cracker, ‘This is my body.’ You are sinning by not seeing this truth and turning away from what is clearly God’s intended plan for humanity.”

Let’s face it: it’s trendy to be gluten-free. It’s the “in thing” right now. Popular alternative health sites tout gluten-free as a panacea for nearly all the ills of modern humanity. And many do feel better when reducing that item from their diets.

For me, reducing is not an option. Total elimination has become necessary.

I’ve also heard many people say, “Oh yes, I tried to cut down on the bread I eat, but it really didn’t seem to work for me, so I returned to normal eating.”

This is similar to someone saying, “Oh yes, I tried homosexual lifestyle, it didn’t work for me. I have returned to normal sexuality.”

I say this because I have no hard evidence of a scientifically-verified disease besides my bodily reactions when I do accidentally ingest any gluten-containing foods. With careful avoidance, I am extraordinarily healthy. I puzzle my physicians. According to their world, someone my age should be taking something that raises this or lowers that or relieves something else. Instead, I radically changed my diet, and am vibrant, energetic, alert and able to do what I want.

Unless, of course, I eat something containing gluten.

But I have no valid test that shows it. No “doctor’s orders” to fall back on. No hard, empirical evidence, scientifically corroborated, that this is indeed a problem. In fact, I’ve not even bothered with the expensive, often wrong, more often inconclusive laboratory tests. I simply know myself and know myself well.

But I’m a lot of trouble, I’m not normal, and, as I was reminded at Annual Conference, I am not welcome at the Table much of the time. And I wonder if, in my own small way, my experience mirrors the world of those who are sexually wired differently from what is considered “normal.” Because the church so often says to them, “If you would just repent, you could leave that sin behind.”

Neither I nor they have a certificate of authenticity that says, “Yes, she/is really is made this way.” We don’t have scientific “proof” that some people are born gay or lesbian (although there is good proof that a small percentage are born intersexed–and no one is dealing with that very well).

At this point, I ask this question of those clergy who, for reasons that I believe are right for them no matter how much I disagree, have declared that homosexuality is a sin: “Will you serve the sacrament to a declared homosexual?

If so, why? How can you? Read again the historic invitation: “Christ our Lord invites to his table all who who love him, earnestly repent of their sin, and seek to live in peace with one another.” If so-called “practicing homosexuals,” such as a partnered gay/lesbian couple, approach the table, and that partnership that will not be dissolved or renounced before the reception of the Sacrament, how can you in good conscience serve them?”

They have not repented of their sin, and you are not at peace with them, nor they with you.

The parallel: If my gluten-free state is just all in my mind, especially since it has not been scientifically verified, should I not properly be denied the Sacrament? If homosexuality is indeed a choice, since we have yet to actually identify a “homosexual” genetic source or brain pattern, should not practicing homosexuals be denied the Sacrament?

Essentially, those in that situation are told, “Repent of who you ARE, and we’ll open the doors and all will be well with God and community,” rather than “repent of what you have done so you may receive the fullness of gracious intimacy with God and with your community.”

Now, clearly there’s a material difference between the two situations.

For me, it is a sorrow to be denied the sacrament so routinely but there is otherwise no systematic rejection of my state nor, as least as far as I know, am I declared an unrepentant sinner for my dietary decision. For the differently-sexually-wired, it is routine to be denied acceptance as those who have been fully redeemed by the grace of God for there is always a tinge of “unrepentant sinner” marked upon them.

However, for me it often becomes a moral decision to deny myself the sacrament. Whether it is a moral decision for the Celebrant at the Service of Holy Communion to deny me the sacrament is another story.

I now state publicly that it is a moral and ecclesiastical imperative for any clergy who affirms that homosexual practice is a sin to deny the Sacrament to those in the GLBTQ community who refuse to repent.

It’s time to take our sacramental responsibility as ordained clergy seriously. Until the UMC changes its position on the language in the Book of Discipline which declares the practice of homosexuality to be incompatible with Christian teaching, then not one single “unrepentant” and “practicing” homosexual should be received at the Table.

At the very least, we would be consistent. Not particularly Christian, not particularly United Methodist. But at least we’d less hypocritical.

Christianity

religion

sacrament

The Book of Disicpline

the Eucharist

the practice of homosexuality

The United Methodist Church

UMC

UMC schism

Previous Post

June 11, 2014

Celebrating the Dads

Next Post

June 20, 2014 The Religious/Political Connection

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category " obedience abortion accommodation accountability administration adolescence Advent advice an ordinary death anxiety apology apportionments Ash Wednesday ask thoughtfulpastor baptism betrayal Bible bondage calling certainty change character charity children Christianity Christmas church church as garden clergy clergy credentials closure comfort compassion competition compromise Confirmation conservation conservative conspiracy theories consumer conversion coronavirua corruption courage covenant cultural context death Deconstruction discipleship discord divorce doctrine doing good drugs dysfunctional Easter Easter; Resurrection education election entertainment envy escape evaluation evil exclusive church exercise faith faithfulness family fasting fear feast featured film review finances first world problem food forgiveness fundamentalist garden gay marriage General Conference generosity giving thanks GLBT glory good government grace guilt habit happy harmony hateful acts healing health health care heaven hell hello/goodbye heresy hidden agenda holiness homelessness homosexuality humility hymn hypocrisy Imago Dei In training inclusive church indulgence injustice innocents insurance intolerance itinerancy joy Justice kindness Kingdom of Heave kingdom of heaven language laughter laundry lawsuit leadership Lent LGBTQ liberal life Little Things Matter longform meandering thoughts memories mercy metaphor metrics miracle misfortunes morality Mormon Muslim mystery worship natural disasters New Category Name nutrients older adults oppression pain Paleo paperwork partnered pastor peace pension pharmaceutical placebo politics poverty prayer privilege public schools questions quiet racism rain reason reconciliation religion repentance requirements rescue respect rest resurrection retirement Sabbath sacrament sacred salvation same-sex marriage sanctuary schism schooling science SCOTUS secrecy separation of church and state sexism sexuality short cuts silence sin sleep soil spiritual journey stillness suffering surgery sustainable church teacher technology thank you theology therapy thinking tolerance TOS trust truth Uncategorized welcome Why Easter? wisdom women worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 December 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 March 2025 February 2025 December 2024 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 April 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 October 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 March 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz