Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The Inerrant, Infallible Bible: The Hermeneutical Crisis #UMC #UMCschism

The Inerrant, Infallible Bible: The Hermeneutical Crisis #UMC #UMCschism

Last updated on: May 27, 2014 at 7:57 pm by Christy Thomas

The Inerrant, Infallible Bible: The Hermeneutical Crisis #UMC #UMCschism 2014-05-27T19:57:04-05:00 Christy Thomas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The blogosphere exploded last week after the primarily anonymous “Gang of 80” announced through Good News their desire to split The United Methodist Church. In my opinion, anyone who thinks this attempt to separate is “good news” has never been through a church split or divorce, but they feel that an interpretative issue is irreconcilable.

Infallibility and Inerrancy

One paragraph of their press release leaped off the page:

It is a crisis regarding the inspiration and the authority of the Scriptures, where some believe that, rightly understood, the Bible is the infallible word of God, and where others believe that significant parts of the Scriptures do not provide an accurate understanding of God’s heart and mind and may be discarded as uninspired and in error. [bold type mine]

Tom Lambrecht posted on the Good News site his understanding of what “infallibility” means. His post should be read. He reminds us that “infallibility” was a word used by John Wesley and that these words may be found in our Confession of Faith:

We believe the Holy Bible, Old and New Testaments, reveals the Word of God so far as it is necessary for our salvation. It is to be received through the Holy Spirit as the true rule and guide for faith and practice. Whatever is not revealed in or established by the Holy Scriptures is not to be made an article of faith nor is it to be taught as essential to salvation (Confession of Faith, Article IV).

And while I appreciate his clarification, it is my contention that one cannot today separate “infallibility” from “inerrancy.” The two are inextricably entangled.

I wish to speak about that here.

I may be the only United Methodist clergy person who can speak with accuracy to the challenges–and the reliefs–of living in an inerrant/infallible world. I earned a Master of Theology at Dallas Theological Seminary. Here is the doctrinal statement. DTS and Asbury Seminary, a non-United Methodist Seminary but whose theology permeates the “Gang of 80,” are nearly twin sisters doctrinally.

I rarely speak of this educational experience, having earned a D-Min at Perkins School of Theology about ten years later. Nonetheless, it was formative in my life and left me quite well-educated biblically. Among other things, I gained significant fluency in reading both biblical Greek and Hebrew and acquired much skill in the art of textual criticism and exegesis.

I know intimately the inerrant/infallible world.

Late last week, I saw this article in the New York Times about the crisis at Bryan College, a well-known Evangelical school. Keep in mind that the Good News movement self-defines as Evangelical. The crisis is about the necessity of affirming an historical Adam and Eve for students and faculty.

Now, Bryan College is a doctrinally-driven school. Here is their statement of belief–and all faculty must reaffirm this each year. Included in that statement is this description of the Scriptures: that the holy Bible, composed of the Old and New Testaments, is of final and supreme authority in faith and life, and, being inspired by God, is inerrant in the original writings;

Below is the generally accepted definition of inerrancy. This comes from the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy and this is what is used to define inerrancy by pretty well all of Evangelicalism, i.e., those who see themselves as orthodox in belief. Timothy Tennent, President of Asbury Seminary and a spokesperson for the Good News/evangelical portion of the UMC, has self-defined himself and those who agree with him as “orthodox” while those who do not agree fully are now labeled “heterodox. A strong in-group/out-group line is characteristic of the Evangelical/infallible/inerrant world of biblical scholarship.

A Short Statement

1. God, who is Himself Truth and speaks truth only, has inspired Holy Scripture in order thereby to reveal Himself to lost mankind through Jesus Christ as Creator and Lord, Redeemer and Judge. Holy Scripture is God’s witness to Himself.

2. Holy Scripture, being God’s own Word, written by men prepared and superintended by His Spirit, is of infallible divine authority in all matters upon which it touches: it is to be believed, as God’s instruction, in all that it affirms: obeyed, as God’s command, in all that it requires; embraced, as God’s pledge, in all that it promises.

3. The Holy Spirit, Scripture’s divine Author, both authenticates it to us by His inward witness and opens our minds to understand its meaning.

4. Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God’s acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God’s saving grace in individual lives.

5. The authority of Scripture is inescapably impaired if this total divine inerrancy is in any way limited or disregarded, or made relative to a view of truth contrary to the Bible’s own; and such lapses bring serious loss to both the individual and the Church.

This “short statement” is then amplified by multiple “We affirm and we deny articles. The last one reads this way:

Article XIX.

WE AFFIRM that a confession of the full authority, infallibility, and inerrancy of Scripture is vital to a sound understanding of the whole of the Christian faith. We further affirm that such confession should lead to increasing conformity to the image of Christ.

The Challenges and the Reliefs

First the reliefs of living in an infallible/inerrant world:

Hard decisions are made by the exegetical experts: enormous trust is placed in Evangelical scholars and the decisions made by them that concern the belief structure. Church members for the most part are not expected to think for themselves theologically, but to receive from the pastor(s) the parameters of what they must believe in order to be saved.

Again, there are strong in-group/out-group boundaries, leading to greater cohesiveness in the “in-group” corral. That cohesiveness promotes a sense of safety, of likemindedness, of willingness to expend oneself to the cause of enlarging the group who are “in,” because the “in-ness” is necessary for salvation.

Hell is very real and is reserved for those who do not believe rightly. Being in means an assurance that one is heavenly bound.

Salvation is very much an individual decision, and must be entered into with intentionality and full intellectual assent. As such, children may not be baptized–they do not have the necessary knowledge to make that kind of decision. They are often “dedicated” with the hope that they, too, will be saved someday. This belief structure mandates careful teaching of children and youth and is a big part of the growing home-school movement. There is much theological safety here.

The Challenges

There is little room for dissent. This is why, when the original “Gang of 60” came out with their statement, I wrote the post, “The Inquisition Cometh,” for which I took a lot of heat. But I’ve been there. And I know what happens.

Because a textual only reading of Scripture (not one modified by cultural factors and a wider theological view) does effectively eliminate women from positions of spiritual authority, female clergy, particularly those serving in Senior Pastor roles and with sacramental authority, are anathema. Please note: as far as anyone knows, the current (mostly anonymous) “Gang of 80” has no female clergy among the adherents.

The inerrant/infallible world tends strongly to Republican voting patterns. Those who vote for Democrats are viewed with considerable suspicion.

Ambiguity has little or no place here. Students are taught and often indoctrinated into a world of clean and textually defended theology. They are told that church members should hear messages based on absolutes and absolutes only.

Sexual/gender divisions are rigid and enforced. Women have special “roles” that are distinct from the roles that men enter into. The fact that some people are born intersexed (with ambiguous genitalia–i.e., they cannot be pronounced “boy or girl” by external examination at birth) is simply ignored. Homosexuality is always a choice, and always evil.

Young earth cosmology dominates. Those who are comfortable with melding insights from science with biblical truths are often accused of not really believing the Bible. This is the world of Ken Hamm and his Creationism Museum.

Again, decisions are already made–it is the job of the church to mold themselves into that pre-determined shape. It is a safe and clean world.

Hermeneutical Choice or Hermeneutical Demand?

I eventually found the infallible/inerrant world to be promoting incredibly dangerous and destructive theology, both personally and for society in general. I wrote this post on why I left evangelicalism, should readers want to know more.

When I began to enter into the world of United Methodism, I discovered, as one close friend put it, that I was a Wesleyan long before I ever read John Wesley. I learned of a grace-infused world that could actually embrace the wide tent that includes both George Bush AND Hilary Clinton. I discovered and engaged in radically life-transforming ministry here.

Personally, I still think there is room both for the traditionalist (or the “orthodox”) and the progressives (or the “heterodox”). But there is room ONLY if the understanding of Scripture as infallible/inerrant is properly surfaced and acknowledged as a hermeneutical choice, not a hermeneutical demand.

The “orthodox” are going to have to explain how they can permit female clergy (extremely clear in the NT that this should not be the case) with culturally conditioned readings and not acknowledge same-sex monogamous partnerships by applying similar culturally conditioned readings.

If we must operate by only one hermeneutical viewpoint, then there will be winners and losers. In that case, only one side can win: the inerrant/infallible ones. Because that camp can’t admit to alternative views or interpretations. And then the Inquisition really does come.

Then this powerful, mysterious, often-crazy and equally as often-transformative United Methodist Church will splinter, not split.

The United Methodist Church

Timothy Tennnent

UMC

Previous Post

May 22, 2014

Memory Weekend Approaches--What Will We Do With It?

Next Post

May 29, 2014 The Coup D'Etat Hope of the Good News "Gang of 80" #UMC #UMCschism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category " obedience abortion accommodation accountability administration adolescence Advent advice an ordinary death anxiety apology apportionments Ash Wednesday ask thoughtfulpastor baptism betrayal Bible bondage calling certainty change character charity children Christianity Christmas church church as garden clergy clergy credentials closure comfort compassion competition compromise Confirmation conservation conservative conspiracy theories consumer conversion coronavirua corruption courage covenant cultural context death Deconstruction discipleship discord divorce doctrine doing good drugs dysfunctional Easter Easter; Resurrection education election entertainment envy escape evaluation evil exclusive church exercise faith faithfulness family fasting fear feast featured film review finances first world problem food forgiveness fundamentalist garden gay marriage General Conference generosity giving thanks GLBT glory good government grace guilt habit happy harmony hateful acts healing health health care heaven hell hello/goodbye heresy hidden agenda holiness homelessness homosexuality humility hymn hypocrisy Imago Dei In training inclusive church indulgence injustice innocents insurance intolerance itinerancy joy Justice kindness Kingdom of Heave kingdom of heaven language laughter laundry lawsuit leadership Lent LGBTQ liberal life Little Things Matter longform meandering thoughts memories mercy metaphor metrics miracle misfortunes morality Mormon Muslim mystery worship natural disasters New Category Name nutrients older adults oppression pain Paleo paperwork partnered pastor peace pension pharmaceutical placebo politics poverty prayer privilege public schools questions quiet racism rain reason reconciliation religion repentance requirements rescue respect rest resurrection retirement Sabbath sacrament sacred salvation same-sex marriage sanctuary schism schooling science SCOTUS secrecy separation of church and state sexism sexuality short cuts silence sin sleep soil spiritual journey stillness suffering surgery sustainable church teacher technology thank you theology therapy thinking tolerance TOS trust truth Uncategorized welcome Why Easter? wisdom women worship

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 December 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 June 2025 March 2025 February 2025 December 2024 November 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 April 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 October 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 March 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz