Reversing Down syndrome and the Golden Rule

Last updated on: October 10, 2013 at 6:09 am by Amy Julia Becker

Reversing Down syndrome and the Golden Rule 2013-10-09T13:44:50-04:00 Amy Julia Becker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Nine years ago, my daughter Juliet was born. She had ruby-red lips, dark eyes, and Down syndrome. While I haven’t considered changing the first two characteristics, I have paid attention to possible treatments for the last one.

Earlier this year, researchers announced that that they had successfully “turned off” Down syndrome. Down syndrome is caused by an extra 21st Chromosome and they had genetically turned off the third copy in cells in petri dishes. Mere months later, researchers at Johns Hopkins announced that they had reversed the effects of Down syndrome.

From the news report:

The researchers injected into the brains of newborn mice a molecule of sonic hedgehog pathway agonist to boost the growth of a gene called SHH, a gene critical to brain development. Untreated, brains with Down syndrome typically have a cerebellum 60% of normal size; the one injection normalized the cerebellum’s growth through adulthood. The researchers also found that the treated mice benefited in learning and memory, being able to navigate water mazes as well as typical mice. However, the researchers caution that translating this treatment into humans with Down syndrome could trigger cancer.

This news was reported widely and seen as a very good thing: yet another potential treatment for overcoming the intellectual disability associated with Down syndrome. But, the news made me think of a lesson I learned when we tried an earlier treatment for our daughter.

The Principle of Universality

When our daughter was a newborn, I latched onto the logic that since chromosomes contain genes which affect how the body develops and operates. My daughter happened to have an extra chromosome, so couldn’t that extra expression of genetic material be counterbalanced or neutralized? We went for our one-year-old appointment and our local geneticist almost off-handedly asked, “I’m sure you’ve heard about TNI?” We hadn’t.

TNI stands for Targeted Nutritional Intervention. It is a protocol of mega-dosages of vitamins and natural products. TNI marketing promises that it helps overcome the effects of Down syndrome by using the logic of balancing out the over-expression of the 21st Chromosome. The dosages are heavy with anti-oxidants to reduce oxidative stress found in the cells of those with Down syndrome, as well as immune system building vitamins.

TNI is controversial. Neither national Down syndrome organization supports it due to a lack of medical studies. Further, part of the TNI protocol includes treating your child with pharmaceuticals, as there are reports that anti-depressant and anti-seizure drugs possibly improve cognition in individuals with Down syndrome.

We ultimately chose just the vitamin supplements of TNI after our nutritionist checked out the dosages and concluded that, at worst, it would do no harm beyond just costing us money. When I shared our decision with a good friend of mine who also has a daughter with Down syndrome, he asked me a very salient question:

What mega-vitamins are you taking to overcome your deficiencies?

His point being, I was somewhat using my daughter as a medical guinea pig on the theory that mega-vitamin dosages would make her smarter. Why wasn’t I, then, taking drugs to improve my cognition?

College students are using ADHD medicine to reportedly improve their concentration. Authors and rock bands have said mind-altering drugs helped them create their art. And, athletes are taking all sorts of performance enhancing products. I’m not taking any of that. I’m even choosing to be bald despite all sorts of products that promise to recapture my youth and virility by growing/transplanting/plugging a new head of hair. Yet, I was willing to subject my daughter to enhancement treatment.

Ultimately, we stopped TNI after about a year because my daughter couldn’t stand the vitamin-y taste. But I’m reminded of my friend’s question whenever I hear about treatments for Down syndrome like the recent sonic hedgehog injection and how Down syndrome was “turned off.” We should consider the principle of the golden rule–in ethics called the “universality principle”–when considering these potential treatments for Down syndrome.

When it comes to these treatments: if it’s so good, would you do it to yourself?

Mark W. Leach blogs at www.downsyndromeprenataltesting.com.

This is adapted from a series of posts on the new possible treatments for Down syndrome.

He has left out the picture of the two-faced cat, but you can view that at this link.

Disability

Down Syndrome

curing down syndrome

down syndrome research

Previous Post

October 9, 2013

Down Syndrome Research, Hope for My Daughter

Next Post

October 11, 2013 "The Discipline of Place" and Things to Read this Week

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Articles Books Disability Down Syndrome Faith family Perfectly Human Uncategorized

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz