Pro-Choice and Pro-Life or Somewhere In Between?

Last updated on: November 21, 2011 at 8:00 am by Amy Julia Becker

Pro-Choice and Pro-Life or Somewhere In Between? 2011-11-20T21:13:14-05:00 Amy Julia Becker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Much thanks to Ellen Painter Dollar and Karen Swallow Prior for their posts last week on Why I Am Pro-Life (Karen) and Why I Am Pro-Choice (Ellen). And great thanks to all of you who read and commented with respect, thoughtfulness, and genuine concern for both the women and children involved in this debate (and not just, it seems to me, concern for winning an argument). I wrote last week that I would be posing follow up questions for Karen and Ellen and posting those questions today. I have posed the questions, and they have written very helpful answers. The answers are long enough, however, to deserve 3-4 posts, and so I am going to wait to post them until next week for two reasons. One, I don’t want to be talking about abortion on Thanksgiving. Two, I will be in New Orleans with Peter’s family this week, and I won’t be able to moderate this blog if/as contentious topics arise. So–please tune back in next Monday for further conversation about this important topic.

To give you a taste of the questions we’ll consider:

I asked Ellen:

Why is ending the existence of an embryo or fetus morally different than ending the life of a baby once s/he is born? In other words, if we are treating embryos with reverence as human lives created in the image of God, why is abortion not murder?

What restrictions would you put on reproductive choice?

And for Karen:

You believe that human life begins at conception. Does that make abortion the moral equivalent of murder?

In saying that you are “pro-life,” I assume you mean (and correct me if I’m wrong) that abortion should be illegal, or at least not protected by the constitution. How do you respond to Ellen Painter Dollar’s contention that making abortion illegal will ultimately perpetuate the destruction of human life, only now in a way that poses grave physical risks to the mother as well as the unborn child?

You write that you would allow abortion in the case of saving the life of the mother. In these cases, would the mother be the person who gets to choose? How, if at all, would the government be involved?

For those of you who want more information about current issues related to abortion, please read “The Rise of the Abortion Doula,” and please consider (per Sherry’s comments on Karen’s post last week) the language of “justice.”

I will be posting for the rest of this week, just on less controversial topics.

Previous Post

November 18, 2011

Why I Am Pro-Choice by Ellen Painter Dollar

Next Post

November 22, 2011 Will Your Kids Keep the Faith?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Articles Books Disability Down Syndrome Faith family Perfectly Human Uncategorized

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 September 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz